Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Consolidation of School District No. 30 v. Consolidated School District No. 30, 185 N.W. 961.

30 citing documents.

Independent School District No. 35 v. Engelstad 144 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1966
Independent School District No. 35 v. Engelstad 144 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1966
No. 30, 151 Minn. 52 , .
In RE APPEAL OF LEGO v. Rolfe 129 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1964
In RE APPEAL OF LEGO v. Rolfe 129 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1964
No. 30, 151 Minn. 52, 56 , , we said: “* * * The word ‘district’ occurs in it [the statute] in many places *489 and always in connection with or by way of reference to a school district * * *.
Williams v. Rolfe 101 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1960
Williams v. Rolfe 101 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1960
No. 30, 151 Minn. 52 , .
State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Mettler 89 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1958
State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Mettler 89 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1958
No. 30, 151 Minn. 52 , .
Sullivan v. Joint Independent Consolidated School District No. 102 88 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1958
Sullivan v. Joint Independent Consolidated School District No. 102 88 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1958
No. 30, 151 Minn. 52 , ; In re Order of Superintendent of Schools, Nobles County, 239 Minn. 233 , 58 N. W. (2d) 465 ; In re *385 Dissolution of School Dist.
Thorland v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 44 74 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1956
In Re Certain School Districts, Freeborn County 246 Minn. 96 Minn. 1956
In Re Certain School Districts, Freeborn County 246 Minn. 96 Minn. 1956
No. 30, 151 Minn. 52 , 185 N.W.
Thorland v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 44 74 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1956
No. 30, 151 Minn. 52 , .
In Re Dissolution of School District No. 33 60 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1953
In Re Dissolution of School District No. 33 60 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1953
No. 30, 151 Minn. 52, 58 , .
Peterson v. Joint Independent Consolidated School District No. 116 58 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 1953
In Re Order of Superintendent of Schools, Nobles County 239 Minn. 233 Minn. 1953
In Re Order of Superintendent of Schools, Nobles County 239 Minn. 233 Minn. 1953
No. 30, 151 Minn. 52, 58 , 185 N.W.
Peterson v. Joint Independent Consolidated School District No. 116 58 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 1953
No. 30, 151 Minn. 52, 58 , .
State v. End 45 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1950
State v. End 45 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1950
No. 30, 151 Minn. 52, 56 , ; Rhone v. Loomis, 74 Minn. 200, 204 , ; State v. McCrum, 38 Minn. 154 , , for cases where rule of ejusdem generis is applied to interpret words of general meaning in statutes.
In Re Trust Created by Anneke 38 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1949
In Re Trust Created by Anneke 38 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1949
No. 30, 151 Minn. 52 , .
Larson v. Security Bank & Trust Co. 224 N.W. 235 Minn. 1929
Larson v. Security Bank & Trust Co. 224 N.W. 235 Minn. 1929
No. 30, 151 Minn. 52 , 185 N.W.
Gunderson v. Williams 221 N.W. 231 Minn. 1928
Gunderson v. Williams 221 N.W. 231 Minn. 1928
No. 30, 151 Minn. 52 , .
Consolidated School District No. 30 v. Christison 208 N.W. 409 Minn. 1926
Consolidated School District No. 30 v. Christison 208 N.W. 409 Minn. 1926
No. 30, 151 Minn. 52 , , there was an ambiguity as to the word “district” in the proviso in chapter 238, p. 336, L. 1915, and as to the use of the same word in the proviso in *47 L. 1917, p. 621, c. 410, and it is sought to have us sustain this classification upon the doctrine of Cobb v. Bord, 40 Minn. 479 , .