Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lading v. City of Duluth, 190 N.W. 981.

53 citing documents.

Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees 358 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1984
Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees 358 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1984
See Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , 190 N.W.
Scott v. Southview Chevrolet Co. 267 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1978
Scott v. Southview Chevrolet Co. 267 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1978
Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , 190 N.W.
Maronde v. Robert Carr Construction Co. 235 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 1975
Maronde v. Robert Carr Construction Co. 235 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 1975
We have held that with respect to the original treating physician the employee “should have the option or unquestioned right to choose his medical attendant, or accept the one tendered him by the employer * * Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464, 467 , and Carmody v. City of St.
Appeal of O'Rourke 220 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1974
Stolp v. Scrimshaw 220 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1974
Appeal of O'Rourke 220 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1974
As stated in Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464, 468 , 190 N.W.
Stolp v. Scrimshaw 220 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1974
As stated in Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464, 468 , “The jurisdiction of the supreme court of the state is conferred and limited by the state Constitution, section 2, article 6,” which is the “supreme law on the subject and beyond encroachment by legislation.” Considerations of due process and equal protection of the law arising from a
Dudovitz v. Shoppers City, Inc. 164 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1969
Stapleton v. Riverview Speedways, Inc. 93 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 1958
Stapleton v. Riverview Speedways, Inc. 93 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 1958
Co. 223 Minn. 277 , 26 N. W. (2d) 459 ; Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , ; State ex rel.
Minnesota State Federation of Labor v. Land O' Lakes Creameries, Inc. 79 N.W.2d 366 Minn. 1956
Minnesota State Federation of Labor v. Land O' Lakes Creameries, Inc. 79 N.W.2d 366 Minn. 1956
(3 ed.) § 397b; also see, Richard v. Federal Cartridge Corp. 217 Minn. 136 , 14 N. W. (2d) 118 ; Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , .
Independent Consolidated School District No. 66 v. Big Stone County 67 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1954
Independent Consolidated School District No. 66 v. Big Stone County 67 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1954
Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , ; State ex rel.
Honeymead Products Co. v. Christgau 47 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1951
Honeymead Products Co. v. Christgau 47 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1951
In construing a statute relating to the review of decisions of the industrial commission, which is substantially identical with the one relating to the review of decisions of the director of the division of employment and security (see Richard v. Federal Cartridge Corp. 217 Minn. 136 , 14 N. W. [2d] 118), this court said in Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , , that a proceeding under the workmen’s compensation act is not a remedial case within the meaning of the constitution; that, althou
Hamlin v. the Coolerator Co. 35 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1949
Hamlin v. the Coolerator Co. 35 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1949
& Supp. § 397b, and cases cited.” *450 In a substantially identical statute relating to review of decisions of the industrial commission as the one relating to a review of decisions of the director, this court said in construing that statute in Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464, 469 , , 983: “* * * It is not there [in this court] examined or considered as an original question and with a view of determining the facts; the determination of the facts resting with the trial court or other
Kennedy v. Thompson Lumber Co. 26 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 1947
Kennedy v. Thompson Lumber Co. 26 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 1947
Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , ; Klein v. McCleary, 154 Minn. 498 , ; State ex rel.
Larson v. Le Mere 18 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1945
Larson v. Le Mere 18 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1945
Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , .
Richard v. Federal Cartridge Corp. 14 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1944
Richard v. Federal Cartridge Corp. 14 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1944
In construing this statute, we said in Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464, 469 , , 983: *138 “* * * It is not there [in this court] examined or considered as an original question and with a view of determining the facts; the determination of the facts resting with the trial court or other-tribunal to which the matter is committed, and the findings there made, unless clearly, o
Carmody v. City of St. Paul 291 N.W. 895 Minn. 1940
Carmody v. City of St. Paul 291 N.W. 895 Minn. 1940
This provision is intended to overcome the objection to permitting the employer to select any physician and require the employe to accept him.” At this point the case of Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , , decided December 1, 1922, must be inserted into the picture.
In Re Trust Under Will of Holden 291 N.W. 104 Minn. 1940
Holden v. First National Bank & Trust Co. 291 N.W. 104 Minn. 1940
Holden v. First National Bank & Trust Co. 291 N.W. 104 Minn. 1940
Walsh v. Kuechenmeister, 196 Minn. 483 , ; Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , ; 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
In Re Trust Under Will of Holden 291 N.W. 104 Minn. 1940
340 ; Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , 190 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Preis v. District Court 243 N.W. 434 Minn. 1932
State Ex Rel. Preis v. District Court 243 N.W. 434 Minn. 1932
Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , ; Public Service Elec.
Tomhave v. Galena 230 N.W. 652 Minn. 1930
Tomhave v. Galena 230 N.W. 652 Minn. 1930
Co. v. District Court, 132 Minn. 249 , ; Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , ; Klein v. McCleary, 154 Minn. 498 , ; Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 172 Minn. 439 , ; Reardon v. City of Austin, 174 Minn. 359 , ; Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , ; Tschida v. Bratt, 179 Minn. 277 , 228 N W. 935.
Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 225 N.W. 428 Minn. 1929
Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 225 N.W. 428 Minn. 1929
Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , ; Klein v. McCleary, 154 Minn. 498 , ; Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 172 Minn. 439 , ; Reardon v. City of Austin, 174 Minn. 359 , .
Engsell v. Northern Motor Co. 219 N.W. 293 Minn. 1928
Engsell v. Northern Motor Co. 219 N.W. 293 Minn. 1928
Kile v. District Court, 146 Minn. 59 , ; Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , ; Schoewe v. Winona P. & G. Co. 155 Minn. 4 , ; Walker v. Minn. Steel Co. 167 Minn. 475 , ; Smith v. Mason Bros. Co. supra, p. 94.
Zobitz v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 209 N.W. 313 Minn. 1926
Zobitz v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 209 N.W. 313 Minn. 1926
Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , .
O'Rourke v. Percy Vittum Co. 207 N.W. 636 Minn. 1926
O'Rourke v. Percy Vittum Co. 207 N.W. 636 Minn. 1926
Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , ; Klein v. McCleary, 154 Minn. 498 , ; State ex rel.
State ex rel. Lescault v. Industrial Commission of Minnesota 193 N.W. 34 Minn. 1923
State ex rel. Lescault v. Industrial Commission of Minnesota 193 N.W. 34 Minn. 1923
Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , ; Schoewe v. Winona Paint & Class Co. supra, page 4.
Schoewe v. Winona Paint & Glass Co. 191 N.W. 1009 Minn. 1923
Schoewe v. Winona Paint & Glass Co. 191 N.W. 1009 Minn. 1923
Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , ; Harris v. Kaul, 149 Minn. 428 , ; State ex rel.
Klein v. McCleary 192 N.W. 106 Minn. 1923