Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Arterburn v. County of Redwood, 191 N.W. 924.

28 citing documents.

Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
Arterburn v. County of Redwood, 154 Minn. 338 , 191 N.W.
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
Arterburn v. County of Redwood, 154 Minn. 338 , ; Ledoux v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498 , ; Erickson v. Kircher, 168 Minn. 67 , ; McGough v. McCarthy Imp.
Jackson v. Cathcart & Maxfield, Inc. 276 N.W. 22 Minn. 1938
Jackson v. Cathcart & Maxfield, Inc. 276 N.W. 22 Minn. 1938
165 ; Arterburn v. County of Redwood, 154 Minn. 338 , 191 N.W.
Dahl v. Wunderlich 259 N.W. 399 Minn. 1935
Dahl v. Wunderlich 259 N.W. 399 Minn. 1935
D. M. Gilmore Co. v. District Court, 147 Minn. 12 , ; Arterburn v. County of Redwood, 154 Minn. 338 , ; Campbell v. Connolly Contracting Co. 179 Minn. 416 , .
Janosek v. Farmers Co-Operative Creamery Co. 234 N.W. 870 Minn. 1931
Janosek v. Farmers Co-Operative Creamery Co. 234 N.W. 870 Minn. 1931
Eelators cite and rely on Arterburn v. County of Redwood, 154 Minn. 338 , ; Zarns v. Swanville S. S. Assn. 177 Minn. 462 , ; Charpentier v. Cumming, 178 Minn. 519 , ; Tschida v. Bratt, 179 Minn. 277 , .
Campbell v. Connolly Contracting Co. 229 N.W. 561 Minn. 1930
Campbell v. Connolly Contracting Co. 229 N.W. 561 Minn. 1930
216 ; Arterburn v. County of Redwood, 154 Minn. 338 , 191 N.W.
Tschida v. Bratt 228 N.W. 935 Minn. 1930
Tschida v. Bratt 228 N.W. 935 Minn. 1930
D. M. Gilmore Co. v. District Court, 147 Minn. 12 , ; Arterburn v. County of Redwood, 154 Minn. 338 , ; Edelbrock v. M. St.
Stucky v. Independent School District No. 77 221 N.W. 911 Minn. 1928
Stucky v. Independent School District No. 77 221 N.W. 911 Minn. 1928
D. M. Gilmore Co. v. District Court, 147 Minn. 12 , ; Arterburn v. County of Redwood, 154 Minn. 338 , ; Schoewe v. Winona P. & G. Co. 155 Minn. 4 , ; Erickson v. Kircher, 168 Minn. 67 , ; 6 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Rouse v. Town of Bird Island 211 N.W. 327 Minn. 1926
Rouse v. Town of Bird Island 211 N.W. 327 Minn. 1926
In so doing reliance seems to have been placed on Arterburn v. County of Redwood, 154 Minn. 338 , ; but the majority opinion of the court in that case turned on the fact that one Wilson had been employed by the county and Arterburn was the employe of Wilson.
Erickson v. Kircher 209 N.W. 644 Minn. 1926
Erickson v. Kircher 209 N.W. 644 Minn. 1926
v. District Court, 147 Minn. 12 , ; Arterburn v. Redwood County, 154 Minn. 338 , ; Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Ledoux v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498 , .
Schullo v. Village of Nashwauk 207 N.W. 621 Minn. 1926
Schullo v. Village of Nashwauk 207 N.W. 621 Minn. 1926
The case of Arterburn v. County of Redwood, 154 Minn. 338 , , does not make against this view.
Ledoux v. Joncas 204 N.W. 635 Minn. 1925
Ledoux v. Joncas 204 N.W. 635 Minn. 1925
Arterburn v. County of Redwood, 154 Minn. 338 , ; Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , *501 .
Edelbrock v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 196 N.W. 807 Minn. 1924
Edelbrock v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 196 N.W. 807 Minn. 1924
The relationship of employer and employe is in essence a contractual one, Caron v. Powers-Simpson Co. 96 Minn. 192 , ; Arterburn v. County of Redwood, 154 Minn. 338 , ; 26 Cyc.
State ex rel. Albert Lea Packing Co. v. Industrial Commission of Minnesota 193 N.W. 450 Minn. 1923
State ex rel. Albert Lea Packing Co. v. Industrial Commission of Minnesota 193 N.W. 450 Minn. 1923
D. M. Gilmore Co. v. District Court, 147 Minn. 12 , ; Arterburn v. Redwood County, 153 Minn. 338 , .