Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Winne v. Lahart, 193 N.W. 587.

35 citing documents.

The Bank of New York Mellon, f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Trustee for The Certificateholders of … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bank of New York Mellon v. Keiran 863 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bank of New York Mellon v. Keiran 863 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
On the contrary, the supreme court has held that “an action to foreclose is one in personam,” although “in a sense it is in the nature of a proceeding in rem; because it has for its object the enforcement of the lien of the mortgage on specific property.” Winne v. Lahart, 155 Minn. 307, 310 , 193 N.W.
The Bank of New York Mellon, f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Trustee for The Certificateholders of … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
On the contrary, the supreme court has held that “an action to foreclose is one in personam,” although “in a sense it is in the nature of a proceeding in rem, because it has for its object the enforcement of the lien of the mortgage on specific property.” Winne v. Lahart, 155 Minn. 307, 310, 193 N.W.
Roemhildt v. Kristall Development, Inc. 798 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Roemhildt v. Kristall Development, Inc. 798 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
See, e.g., Winne v. Lahart, 155 Minn. 307, 309 , 193 N.W.
American National Bank of Minnesota v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority for Brainerd 773 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
American National Bank of Minnesota v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority for Brainerd 773 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“A deficiency judgment is a personal judgment.” Winne v. Lahart, 155 Minn. 307, 312 , 193 N.W.
Business Bank v. Hanson 769 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 2009
Business Bank v. Hanson 769 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 2009
Winne v. Lahart, 155 Minn. 307, 309-10 , 193 N.W.
City of St. Paul ex rel. Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. St. Anthony Flats Ltd. Partnership 517 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
City of St. Paul ex rel. Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. St. Anthony Flats Ltd. Partnership 517 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Winne v. Lahart, 155 Minn. 307, 309-10 , 193 N.W.
Norwest Bank Hastings National Ass'n v. Franzmeier 355 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Norwest Bank Hastings National Ass'n v. Franzmeier 355 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
ch. 581; Winne v. Lahart, 155 Minn. 307 , 193 N.W.
Cross Companies v. Citizens Mortgage Investment Trust 232 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1975
Cross Companies v. Citizens Mortgage Investment Trust 232 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1975
‘The remedy on the mortgage as a security is exhausted by a foreclosure.’ Winne v. Lahart, 155 Minn. 307, 310 , , 34 A. L. R. 844.
Southern Minnesota Joint Stock Land Bank v. Peck 247 N.W. 242 Minn. 1933
Southern Minnesota Joint Stock Land Bank v. Peck 247 N.W. 242 Minn. 1933
ressed, * * * and that all covenants, agreements and provisions in said note and mortgage shall remain in full force and effect, save as herein expressly altered and modified.” It may be conceded that if there were no acceleration clause in the note, any such stipulation of the mortgage (the effect of which we need not consider) might not be helpful to plaintiff under the rule of Winne v. Lahart, 155 Minn. 307 , , 34 A. L. R. 844, and the earlier cases there cited.
Orth v. Gedorn 242 N.W. 292 Minn. 1932
Gardner v. W. M. Prindle & Co. 240 N.W. 351 Minn. 1932
Gardner v. W. M. Prindle & Co. 240 N.W. 351 Minn. 1932
“The remedy on the mortgage as a security is exhausted by a foreclosure.” Winne v. Lahart, 155 Minn. 307, 310 , , 34 A. L. R. 844.
Quevli Farms, Inc. v. Conner 224 N.W. 264 Minn. 1929
Quevli Farms, Inc. v. Conner 224 N.W. 264 Minn. 1929
Pioneer S. & L. Co. v. Farnham, 50 Minn. 315, 52 .N. W. 897; Winne v. Lahart, 155 Minn. 307 , , 31 A. L. R. 844.
Johnson v. Howe 223 N.W. 148 Minn. 1929
Johnson v. Howe 223 N.W. 148 Minn. 1929
7 Minn. 120 (176); Hostetter v. Alexander, 22 Minn. 559 ; Oster v. Mickley, 35 Minn. 245 , ; Redin v. Branhan, 43 Minn. 283 , ; White v. Miller, 52 Minn. 367 , , 19 L. R. A. 673; Watkins v. Goessler, 65 Minn. 118 , ; Moffett v. Parker, 71 Minn. 139 , , 70 A. S. R. 319; Paulson v. Koon, 85 Minn. 240 , ; Winne v. Lahart, 155 Minn. 307 , , 34 A. L. R. 844; First Nat.
Neutson v. Kemper 216 N.W. 545 Minn. 1927
Neutson v. Kemper 216 N.W. 545 Minn. 1927
148; Grueber v. Lindenmeier, 42 Minn. 99 , ; Winne v. Lahart, 155 Minn. 307 , ; Guaranty Sec.
Kiewel Securities Co. v. Knutson 211 N.W. 1 Minn. 1926
Kiewel Securities Co. v. Knutson 211 N.W. 1 Minn. 1926
175 ; Winne v. Lahart, 155 Minn. 307 , 193 N.W.
Duffy v. Stratton 210 N.W. 866 Minn. 1926
Duffy v. Stratton 210 N.W. 866 Minn. 1926
34 C. J. 252; Crosby v. Farmer, 39 Minn. 305, 309 , ; Troska v. Brecht, 140 Minn. 233 , ; Winne v. Lahort, 155 Minn. 307 , , 34 A. L. R. 844.
Jordan v. Flour City Fuel & Transfer Co. 199 N.W. 231 Minn. 1924
Jordan v. Flour City Fuel & Transfer Co. 199 N.W. 231 Minn. 1924
It was followed and confirmed in Burnside v. Craig, 140 Minn. 404 , , and Winne v. *521 La Hart, 155 Minn. 307 , .
Wade v. Citizens State Bank 197 N.W. 277 Minn. 1924
Wade v. Citizens State Bank 197 N.W. 277 Minn. 1924
Winne v. Lahart, 155 Minn. 307 , .