Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Herron v. Coolsaet Bros., 198 N.W. 134.

88 citing documents.

Toughill v. Melcher 179 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1970
Toughill v. Melcher 179 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1970
In the early cases of Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; and Rouse v. Town of Bird Island, 169 Minn. 367 , , the court considered claims of workmen injured while using independently-owned horses and wagons.
Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 123 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1963
Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 123 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1963
7 Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522, 527 , .
Elwell v. Fake 119 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1962
Elwell v. Fake 119 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1962
be doubted that while decedent was en route for the corporation the latter could exercise that detailed authoritative control over him which we have often held requisite to the employer-employee relationship, Nepstad v. Lambert, 235 Minn. 1 , 50 N. W. (2d) 614 ; Krause v. Bodin, 172 Minn. 467 , ; Rouse v. Town of Bird Island, 169 Minn. 367 , ; Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; and the fact that decedent may have at times received wages from Fake would not be decisive of the issue, in vi
DeVries v. City of Austin 110 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1961
DeVries v. City of Austin 110 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1961
In Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522, 527 , , this court stated: “The degree to which direction and control is exercised is not so important as the manifest right to direct and control where controversy may arise.” In Strohmaier v. Wisconsin Gas & Elec.
Moorhead v. Grassle 93 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1958
Moorhead v. Grassle 93 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1958
Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; 12 Minn. L. Rev. 83 .” It is apparent from the record that Grassle had the unquestioned right to control the means and manner of wrecking the buildings.
Langland v. State Department of Highways 85 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1957
Langland v. State Department of Highways 85 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1957
2 Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Rouse v. Town of Bird Island, 169 Minn. 367 , ; Gossen v. Township of Borgholm, 174 Minn. 227 , .
Darvell v. Paul A. Laurence Co. 57 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 1953
Darvell v. Paul A. Laurence Co. 57 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 1953
“The degree to which direction and control is exercised is not so important as the manifest right to direct and control where controversy may arise.” Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522, 527 , .
Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 49 N.W.2d 797 Minn. 1951
Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 49 N.W.2d 797 Minn. 1951
Lemkuhl v. Clark, 209 Minn. 276 , ; Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; 12 Minn. L. Rev. 83 .
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
211 ; Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , 198 N.W.
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
Virginia & R. L. Co. v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , ; Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Ledoux v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Angell v. White Eagle O. & R. Co. 169 Minn. 183 , ; Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , ; Krause v. Bodin, 172 Minn. 467 , ; Schonberg
Judd v. Sanatorium Commission of Hennepin County 35 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1948
Judd v. Sanatorium Commission of Hennepin County 35 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1948
See, also, Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Ledoux v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Angell v. White Eagle O. & R. Co. 169 Minn. 183 , ; Lynch v. Hutchinson Produce Co. 169 Minn. 329 , ; Rouse v. Town of Bird Island, 169 Minn. 367 , 211 N. W
Castner v. Christgau 24 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1946
Castner v. Christgau 24 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1946
See, Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , ; Waters v. Pioneer Fuel Co. 52 Minn. 474 , , 38 A. S. R. 564.
Korthuis v. Soderling & Sons 16 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1944
Korthuis v. Soderling & Sons 16 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1944
The fol *345 lowing cases, cited and discussed in the Wicklund case, which involved a hauler of pulpwood who furnished his own truck, support this holding: Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Dunn v. Reeves Coal Yards Co. Inc. 150 Minn. 282 , ; Elliason v. Western C. & C. Co. 162 Minn. 213 , ; Angell v. White Eagle O. & R. Co. 169 Minn. 183 , ; Warner v. Fullerton-Powell Hardwood Lbr.
Bergstrom v. Brehmer 8 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1943
Bergstrom v. Brehmer 8 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1943
Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; 12 Minn. L. Bev.
Anfinson v. A. O. U. W. Insurance Co. 3 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1942
Anfinson v. A. O. U. W. Insurance Co. 3 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1942
Virginia & R. L. Co. v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , ; Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522, 525 , .
Rice v. Keystone View Co. 297 N.W. 841 Minn. 1941
Rice v. Keystone View Co. 297 N.W. 841 Minn. 1941
Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; 12 Minn. L. Rev. 83 .
Bolin v. Scheurer 297 N.W. 106 Minn. 1941
Bolin v. Scheurer 297 N.W. 106 Minn. 1941
See Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522, 527 , .
Curtis v. Hedeen 296 N.W. 495 Minn. 1941
Byhardt v. Ballord 296 N.W. 504 Minn. 1941
Byhardt v. Ballord 296 N.W. 504 Minn. 1941
Dahnert v. Township of Otisco, 196 Minn. 478 , ; Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , .
Curtis v. Hedeen 296 N.W. 495 Minn. 1941
Tschida v. Bratt, 179 Minn. 277 , ; Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , ; Ledoux v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498 , ; Schoewe v. Winona Paint & Glass Co. 155 Minn. 4 , ; cf. Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Olson v. Eck’s Homemade Sausage Co. 194 Minn. 458 , ; Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 205 Minn. 595 , .
Lemkuhl v. Clark 296 N.W. 28 Minn. 1941
Lemkuhl v. Clark 296 N.W. 28 Minn. 1941
Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; 12 Minn. L. Rev. 83 .
Whitted v. Town of Ponto Lake 291 N.W. 509 Minn. 1940
Whitted v. Town of Ponto Lake 291 N.W. 509 Minn. 1940
Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Nesseth v. Skelly Oil Co. 176 Minn. 373 , ; Larson v. Duluth Woolen Co. 181 Minn. 417 , ; Dahnert v. Township of Otisco, 196 Minn. 478 , .
Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 287 N.W. 7 Minn. 1939
Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 287 N.W. 7 Minn. 1939
That case has been followed in cases involving the hiring of a driver and team of horses in Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , , and the hiring of a driver and automobile truck in Dunn v. Reeves Coal Yards Co. Inc. 150 Minn. 282 , ; Elliason v. Western C. & C. Co. 162 Minn. 213 , 202 N. W. *601 485; and Angell v. White Eagle O. & R. Co. 169 Minn. 183 , .
Dahl v. Wunderlich 259 N.W. 399 Minn. 1935
Dahl v. Wunderlich 259 N.W. 399 Minn. 1935
He cites Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522, 527 , , and quotes therefrom: “Perhaps the most important test is as to who has the right to direct, and' when and hoAv it shall be done, and who has the right to general control.” *40 Also, C. R. Meyer & Sons Co. v. Grady, 194 Wis.
Anderson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. 251 N.W. 3 Minn. 1933
Anderson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. 251 N.W. 3 Minn. 1933
The facts bring the situation well within that presented in Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , , in which two men, each of whom owned a team and wagon, were employed to haul sewer pipe at 50 cents a ton and in which one of them was injured.
Fuller v. Northern States Power Co. 248 N.W. 756 Minn. 1933
Carter v. W. J. Dyer & Bro. 243 N.W. 436 Minn. 1932