Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 196 N.W. 666.

45 citing documents.

Minn. Dep't of Natural Res. v. Chippewa/Swift Joint Bd. of Commissioners 925 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 2019
Minn. Dep't of Natural Res. v. Chippewa/Swift Joint Bd. of Commissioners 925 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 2019
(quoting Lupkes v. Town of Clifton , 157 Minn. 493 , 196 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources v. Kandiyohi County Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners 359 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1984
Hylen v. Owens 251 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1977
Hylen v. Owens 251 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1977
Plaintiffs argue that “once a ditch is established the landowners have a vested right in the system that cannot be altered,” citing Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493
Fischer v. Town of Albin 104 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1960
Fischer v. Town of Albin 104 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1960
1 To the same effect, see In re County Ditch No. 31 and Judicial Ditch No. 13, Faribault County, 244 Minn. 543 , 70 N. W. (2d) 853 ; Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , .
In Re Petition of Lippmann 81 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1957
In Re Petition of Lippmann 81 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1957
4 Appellants cite as controlling cases In re Petition for County Ditch No. 53, Chippewa County, supra; Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , ; Erhard v. Wagner, 104 Minn. 258 , *14 ; Sheehan v. Flynn, 59 Minn. 436 , , 26 L. R. A. 632.
Oelke v. County of Faribault 70 N.W.2d 853 Minn. 1955
Oelke v. County of Faribault 70 N.W.2d 853 Minn. 1955
Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , ; In re Petition of Jacobson re County Ditch No. 24, 234 Minn. 296 , 48 N. W. (2d) 441 ; In re Petition for County Ditch No. 53, 238 Minn. 392 , 57 N. W. (2d) 158; In re Petition for County Ditch No. 15, 238 Minn. 15 , 55 N. W. (2d) 305 .
Johnson v. County of Steele 60 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1953
Johnson v. County of Steele 60 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1953
406 ; Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , 196 N.W.
Hawkins v. County of Kandiyohi 48 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1951
Hawkins v. County of Kandiyohi 48 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1951
Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , .
In Re Judicial Ditch No. 12 36 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1949
State ex rel. Great Northern Railway Co. v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District 36 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1949
State ex rel. Great Northern Railway Co. v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District 36 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1949
161 Minn. 193 , ; Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , ; In re Judicial Ditch *493 No. 9, 167 Minn. 10 , ; State v. Oldre, 179 Minn. 566 , ; Nostdal v. County of Watonwan, 221 Minn. 376 , 22 N. W. (2d) 461 .
In Re Judicial Ditch No. 12 36 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1949
413 ; Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , 196 N.W.
Oleson v. County of Chippewa 31 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1948
Oleson v. County of Chippewa 31 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1948
In Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , 498 , 196 N.W.
Nostdal v. County of Watonwan 22 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1946
Nostdal v. County of Watonwan 22 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1946
That was definitely our holding in Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493, 497 , , where we held: “The legislature has given to the order establishing a public ditch all of the final and binding force of a judgment in rem.
Slosser v. Great Northern Railway Co. 16 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1944
Slosser v. Great Northern Railway Co. 16 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1944
The ditch was constructed, as it was, and without culverts, just as the county board contemplated- Whether or not it was proper to construct the ditch without culverts the ditch proceeding is now closed and res adjudicata and it cannot be attacked collaterally as it is sought to do in this case.” In Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , , plaintiff’s land was located north of a ditch.
In Re Lake Elysian High-Water Level 293 N.W. 140 Minn. 1940
Clarke v. Wenzel 208 Minn. 158 Minn. 1940
In Re Lake Elysian High-Water Level 293 N.W. 140 Minn. 1940
(Third syllabus paragraph, Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , 196 N.W.
Clarke v. Wenzel 208 Minn. 158 Minn. 1940
Their “new status” claim has for its basis that *164 by the establishment of the ditch and the assessments levied for its construction they acquired, “a property right, appurtenant to the land, and not to be taken or impaired, even through governmental action, except by due process of law.” (Third syllabus paragraph, Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , .)
Township of Normania v. County of Yellow Medicine 286 N.W. 881 Minn. 1939
Township of Normania v. County of Yellow Medicine 286 N.W. 881 Minn. 1939
In re Judicial Ditch No. 4, 160 Minn. 387 , ; Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , .
State v. Oldre 229 N.W. 878 Minn. 1930
State v. Oldre 229 N.W. 878 Minn. 1930
119 Minn. 334 , ; Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , ; State v. Radke, 161 Minn. 416 , ; State v. Holmes, 162 Minn. 173 , ; State v. Fritch, 175 Minn. 206 , .
In Re Delinquent Taxes for 1921 220 N.W. 608 Minn. 1928
State v. Fritch 220 N.W. 608 Minn. 1928
State v. Fritch 220 N.W. 608 Minn. 1928
Also see Lukes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , .
In Re Delinquent Taxes for 1921 220 N.W. 608 Minn. 1928
Also see Lukes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , 196 N.W.
Felepe v. Towns of America and Cedarbend 219 N.W. 158 Minn. 1928
Felepe v. Towns of America and Cedarbend 219 N.W. 158 Minn. 1928
Garrett v. Skorstad, 143 Minn. 256 , ; Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , .
Defiel v. County of Clay 210 N.W. 626 Minn. 1926
Defiel v. County of Clay 210 N.W. 626 Minn. 1926
James, 165 Minn. 34 , ; and Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , .
Olson v. County of Roseau 205 N.W. 372 Minn. 1925
Olson v. County of Roseau 205 N.W. 372 Minn. 1925
It also is plain from what has been said that defendant is in n< position to avail itself of the decisions in Garrett v. Skorstad, 143 *455 Minn. 256, , and Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , .
Huseby v. Schacherer 200 N.W. 471 Minn. 1924
Huseby v. Schacherer 200 N.W. 471 Minn. 1924
G. S. 1913, § 5531; Morey v. City of Duluth, 75 Minn. 221 , ; Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 193 , .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by