Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re Hull, 163 Minn. 439.

25 citing documents.

American Family Insurance, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
And the supreme court has explained that the “damaged or destroyed” language means what it says, clarifying, “The purpose of the constitutional amendment was to give a landowner the right to compensation if his land was damaged, even though there was no physical invasion or appropriation of the land.” In re Hull, 163 Minn. 439, 451 , 204 N.W.
State v. M.D.T. 831 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 2013
Kick's Liquor Store, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 587 N.W.2d 57 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Kick's Liquor Store, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 587 N.W.2d 57 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
771 (1916) (affirming a $750 jury verdict); In re Hull, 163 Minn. 439 , 204 N.W.
Finke v. State 521 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436, 442 , -71 (1964) (citing Vacation of Part of Town of Hibbing, 163 Minn. 439, 451-52 , 204 N.W.
Wegner v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance 479 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1991
Wegner v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance 479 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1991
In re Hull, 163 Minn. 439, 451 , 204 N.W.
Wegner v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Wegner v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See In re Hull, 163 Minn. 439, 451-53 , 204 N.W.
St. Paul Companies, Inc. v. Hatch 449 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1989
St. Paul Companies, Inc. v. Hatch 449 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1989
at 712 ; see also In re Hull, 163 Minn. 439, 444 , 204 N.W.
Hendrickson v. State 127 N.W.2d 165 Minn. 1964
1 Minn. Const. art. 1, § 13, provides: “Private property shall not be taken, destroyed or damaged for public us'e without just compensation therefor, first paid or secured.” See, Vacation of Part of Town of Hibbing, 163 Minn. 439, 450 , , .
City of Crookston v. Erickson 69 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1955
Co. 185 Minn. 281 , ; Vacation of Part of Town of Hibbing, 163 Minn. 439 , , ; see, Feltz v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irr.
Northern Natural Gas Co. v. County of Blue Earth 47 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 1951
In re Application of Hull, etc., 163 Minn. 439 , , , *282 49 A. L. R. 320.
Underwood v. Town Board of Empire 14 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 1944
In re Application of Hull for Vacation of Part of Plat of Hibbing, 163 Minn. 439 , , , 49 A. L. R. 320 (writ of error dismissed, 275 U. S. 491 , 48 S. Ct. 33 , 72 L. ed. 390); Vanderburgh v. City of Minneapolis, 98 Minn. 329 , , 6 L.R.A.(N.S.)
In Re Petition of Krebs to Vacate Street 6 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1942
That is why ‘the final test is whether the public interests will or will not be best served by *347 discontinuing the way.’ In re Vacation of Part of Town of Hib-bing, 163 Minn. 439, 447 , , .
In Re Petition of Schaller 259 N.W. 529 Minn. 1935
In re Vacation of Part of Town of Hibbing, 163 Minn. 439 , 447 , 204 N.W.
Locascio v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 240 N.W. 661 Minn. 1932
Locascio v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 240 N.W. 661 Minn. 1932
L. R. Co. 94 Minn. 108 , ; Painter v. Gunderson, 123 Minn. 323 , ; Thorpe v. City of Ada, 137 Minn. 86 , ; Reed v. Village of Hibbing, 150 Minn. 130 , ; In re Hull, 163 Minn. 439 , , , 49 A. L. R. 320; Erspamer v. Oliver I. Min.
Erspamer v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 229 N.W. 583 Minn. 1930
Erspamer v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 229 N.W. 583 Minn. 1930
Plaintiffs are located substantially the same as the plaintiffs in Reed v. Village of Hibbing, 150 Minn. 130 , , wherein it was held, as in In re Application of Hull, 163 Minn. 439 , , , 49 A. L. R. 320, that a private action for damages for the destruction of a public way cannot be maintained by one Avhose injury is not different in kind from that suffered by the general public though it be greater in degree.
In re Establishment of Judicial Road 176 Minn. 94 Minn. 1928
Skordahl v. Flaherty, 140 Minn. 19 , ; In re Town of Hibbing, 163 Minn. 439, 444 , , .
In Re Establishment of Judicial Road 222 N.W. 578 Minn. 1928
122 ; In re Town of Hibbing, 163 Minn. 439 , 444 , 204 N.W.
City of Duluth v. Railroad & Warehouse Commission 209 N.W. 10 Minn. 1926
City of Duluth v. Railroad & Warehouse Commission 209 N.W. 10 Minn. 1926
Duluth v. Dibblee, 62 Minn. 18 , ; State v. Crosby, 92 Minn. 176 , ; State v. Koochiching R. Co. 146 Minn. 87 , ; In re Hull, 163 Minn. 439 , , .