23,795
Precedential
Granted
Processed
State ex rel. Hilton v. Van Buskirk
Cited by
- Hamilton v. Boyce 48 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1951
- Minar Rodelius Co. v. Lysen 277 N.W. 523 Minn. 1938
- Silliman v. Dobner 205 N.W. 696 Minn. 1925
Opinion text
Per Curiam. For the reasons stated in State ex rel. v. Essling, supra, page 15, the motion of the respondent to quash the writ of quo warranto issued in the above entitled proceeding must be granted, and it is accordingly ordered that such writ be and the same hereby is quashed.