Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Granger v. Craven, 199 N.W. 10.

32 citing documents.

Zambrano v. M and Rc II Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Neil N. Lapidus, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
not to make improper use of the opportunity his employment has gi ven him to acquire that good will.” Granger v. Craven, 159 Minn. 296, 303, 199 N.W.
Donald Dean Oberfoell, individually and Do-Bid Holdings, LLC, d/b/a Do-Bid Online Auctions, Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
553, 555 (1920) (discussing milk and laundry route cases), or where a professional employee built up a client base with the employer’s patients, see Granger v. Craven, 159 Minn. 296, 300, 199 N.W.
Webb Publishing Co. v. Fosshage 426 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Webb Publishing Co. v. Fosshage 426 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Granger v. Craven, 159 Minn. 296, 304-05 , 199 N.W.
Rosewood Mortgage Corp. v. Hefty 383 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Rosewood Mortgage Corp. v. Hefty 383 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Granger v. Craven, 159 Minn. 296 , 199 N.W.
Hruska v. Chandler Associates, Inc. 372 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1985
Hruska v. Chandler Associates, Inc. 372 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1985
See Granger v. Craven, 159 Minn. 296 , 199 N.W.
Saliterman v. Finney 361 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Saliterman v. Finney 361 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Walker Employment Service, Inc. v. Parkhurst, 300 Minn. 264 , Granger v. Craven, 159 Minn. 296 , 199 N.W.
Three Phoenix Co. v. Pace Industries, Inc. 659 P.2d 1271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Walker Employment Service, Inc. v. Parkhurst 219 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 1974
Walker Employment Service, Inc. v. Parkhurst 219 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 1974
Therefore, some proof of irreparable damage ought to be adduced in such a case before equitable relief by way of injunction will issue.” In the case of Granger v. Craven, 159 Minn. 296 , we had to deal with a covenant not to compete which was part of a written employment contract executed by defendant, a physician, pursuant to his commencement of employment with plaintiff, also a physician who had practiced medicine for SO years in the city of Rochester.
American Credit Bureau, Inc. v. Carter 462 P.2d 838 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Eutectic Welding Alloys Corporation v. West 160 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 1968
Eutectic Welding Alloys Corporation v. West 160 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 1968
See, for example, Granger v. Craven, 159 Minn. 296 , , 52 A. L. R. 1356; Andrews v. Cosgriff, 175 Minn. 431 , ; Shaleen v. Stratte, 188 Minn. 219 , .
Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co. 134 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1965
Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co. 134 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1965
(3 ed.) § 8436; National Benefit Co. v. Union Hospital Co. 45 Minn. 272 , , 11 L. R. A. 437; Nelson v. Johnson, *534 38 Minn. 255 , ; Holliston v. Ernston, 124 Minn. 49 , ; Gibbons v. Hansch, 185 Minn. 290 , , 82 A. L. R. 1027, 16 Minn. L. Rev. 712 ; Williams v. Thomson, 143 Minn. 454 , ; Granger v. Craven, 159 Minn. 296 , , 52 A. L. R. 1356; The Menter Co. v. Brock, 147 Minn. 407 , , 20 A. L. R. 857; Standard Oil Co. v. Bertelsen, 186 Minn. 483 , .
Thermorama, Inc. v. Buckwold 125 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1964
Thermorama, Inc. v. Buckwold 125 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1964
3 Granger v. Craven, 159 Minn. 296, 302 , , 52 A. L. R. 1356; Lakeside Oil Co. Inc. v. Slutsky, 8 Wis.
Lassen v. Benton 346 P.2d 137 Ariz. 1959
Perkins v. Hegg 3 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1942
Perkins v. Hegg 3 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1942
See Granger v. Craven, 159 Minn. 296, 299 , , 52 A. L. R. 1356.
Shaleen v. Stratte 246 N.W. 744 Minn. 1933
Shaleen v. Stratte 246 N.W. 744 Minn. 1933
In Granger v. Craven, 159 Minn. 296, 299 , , 52 A. L. R. 1356, it is stated: “The usual and most important function of courts of justice is rather to maintain and enforce contracts than to enable parties thereto to escape their obligation on the pretext of public policy, unless it clearly appears that they contravene public right or the
Standard Oil Co. v. Bertelsen 243 N.W. 701 Minn. 1932
Standard Oil Co. v. Bertelsen 243 N.W. 701 Minn. 1932
We have not overlooked such cases as Granger v. Craven, 159 Minn. 296 , , 52 A. L. R. 1356, and Peoples C. & D. Co. Inc. v. Share, 168 Minn. 474 , .
Andrews v. Cosgriff 221 N.W. 642 Minn. 1928
Andrews v. Cosgriff 221 N.W. 642 Minn. 1928
Granger v. Craven, 159 Minn. 296 , , 52 A. L. R. 1356; Peoples C. & D. Co. Inc. v. Share, 168 Minn. 474 , .
Peoples Cleaning Dyeing Co. Inc. v. Share 210 N.W. 397 Minn. 1926
Peoples Cleaning Dyeing Co. Inc. v. Share 210 N.W. 397 Minn. 1926
Granger v. Craven, 159 Minn. 296 , , further defines the rule which we think applicable to the present case.