Cited by

o; and, so long as the privilege is given them to elect whether they will or will not become bound by the provisions thereof, the agreement is voluntary, and none of the constitutional rights of the parties are infringed by requiring that the terms of the agreement, if entered into, shall be those prescribed by the act.” We are also referred to the two cases of Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495 , , and 158 Minn. 505 , .

Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495 , , and Lienau v. N. W. Tel.

Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , ; Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495 , ; Lienau v. N. W. Tel.

In Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495 , , it was said that an accident arises out of an employment “when it reasonably appears from all the facts and circumstances that there is a causal connection between the conditions which the employer puts about the employe and the resulting injury.” It must be said that the record in the instant c

As said in Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495, 501 , , 293: “Where the work and the conditions of the place where the employe is required to be as an incident to the employment, expose the employe to the happening of an event causing an accident, the accident arises out of the employment.” Such is also the holding in State ex rel.

App.) 226 S. W. 154 ; Novack v. Montgomery, Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495 , ; Favorite v. Kalamazoo State Hospital, 238 Mich.

We have already held that they include, in the building where the employe works, appliances and places not actually used by the employe in the strict course of his employment but as means of ingress (Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495 , ) and egress (Lienau v. N. W. Tel.

It arose from a “risk connected Avith the employment.” Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495, 499 , .

& M. Co. v. District Court, 129 Minn. 176 , ; Hansen v. Northwestern Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495 , ; Olson v. Robinson, Straus & Co. 168 Minn. 114 , ; Orcutt v. Trustees of Wesley M. E. Church, 170 Minn. 97 , ; Moore v. J. A. McNulty Co. 171 Minn. 75 , ; Nygaard v. Throndson Brothers, 173 Minn. 441 , .

Niessen v. District Court, 142 Minn. 335 , ; Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495, 498 , .

The accident to Elmer happened in the course of his employment, Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495 , , and while he was engaged in furthering the business of his employer.

Miller v. District Court, 138 Minn. 326 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 881; Korhonen v. Missabe Ice Co. 153 Minn. 150 , ; Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495 , .