DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hogan v. Twin City Amusement Trust Estate, 193 N.W. 122.

36 citing documents.

  • Jensen v. City of Duluth 130 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 1964
  • Jensen v. City of Duluth 130 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 1964
    There must then be shown “a direct causal connection” between the occupation and the disease, and such direct causal connection must be shown by a fair preponderance of the evidence as was held in Hogan v. Twin City Amusement Trust Estate, 155 Minn. 199 , .
  • Marsolek v. Miller Waste Mills 69 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1955
  • Marsolek v. Miller Waste Mills 69 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1955
    Co. 157 Minn. 122 , , ; Gaetz v. City of Melrose, 155 Minn. 330 , ; Hogan v. Twin City Amusement Trust Estate, 155 Minn. 199 , ; State ex rel.
  • Hartman v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 67 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1954
  • Hartman v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 67 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1954
    “On appeal to the commission from the action of the referee the commission is a fact-finding body, and its jurisdiction as such must be exercised.” In Hogan v. Twin City Amusement Trust Estate, 155 Minn. 199, 201 , , we said: “* * * The testimony being in conflict, an issue of fact was present and the determination of the question was for the referee, and, on appeal from the referee, for the commission.” Apparently the granite company concedes that such is the law in the usual case but contends
  • Pittman v. Pillsbury Flour Mills, Inc. 48 N.W.2d 735 Minn. 1951
  • Pittman v. Pillsbury Flour Mills, Inc. 48 N.W.2d 735 Minn. 1951
    Hogan v. Twin City Amusement Trust Estate, 155 Minn. 199 , ; Gaetz v. City of Melrose, 155 Minn. 330 , ; Hertz v. Watab Paper Co. 180 Minn. 177 , .
  • Kaplan v. Alpha Epsilon Phi Sorority 42 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1950
  • Kaplan v. Alpha Epsilon Phi Sorority 42 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1950
    Hogan v. Twin City Amusement Trust Estate, 155 Minn. 199 , ; Klika v. Independent School Dist.
  • Schmoll v. J. W. Craig Co. 37 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1949
  • Schmoll v. J. W. Craig Co. 37 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1949
    Hogan v. Twin City A. T. Estate, 155 Minn. 199 , ; Olson v. Carlton, 178 Minn. 34 , .
  • Lappinen v. Union Ore Co. 29 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1947
  • Lappinen v. Union Ore Co. 29 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1947
    Co. 215 Minn. 25 , 9 N. W. (2d) 320 ; Barlau v. Minneapolis-Moline P. I. Co. 214 Minn. 564 , 9 N. W. (2d) 6 ; Segerstrom v. Nelson, Mullen & Nelson, Inc. 198 Minn. 298 , ; Olson v. Carlton, 178 Minn. 34 , ; Hogan v. Twin City Amusement Trust Estate, 155 Minn. 199 , .
  • Ogren v. City of Duluth 18 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1945
  • Ogren v. City of Duluth 18 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1945
    For example, in Hogan v. Twin City Amusement Trust Estate, 155 Minn. 199 , , a decision that an employe was not entitled to an award resulting from applying to the evidence the erroneous rule that an employe must prove his case by “clear and satisfactory” evidence instead of by a fair preponderance thereof was set aside as one resulting from an application of an erroneous rul
  • Jacobs v. Village of Buhl 273 N.W. 245 Minn. 1937
  • Jacobs v. Village of Buhl 273 N.W. 245 Minn. 1937
    Healy v. Hoy, 115 Minn. 321 , ; Hogan v. Twin City Amusement Trust Estate, 155 Minn. 199 , .
  • Pearson v. Ford Motor Co. 242 N.W. 721 Minn. 1932
  • Pearson v. Ford Motor Co. 242 N.W. 721 Minn. 1932
    Hogan v. Twin City A. T. Estate, 155 Minn. 199 , ; Babich v. Oliver I. Min.
  • Hertz v. Watab Paper Co. 230 N.W. 481 Minn. 1930
  • Hertz v. Watab Paper Co. 230 N.W. 481 Minn. 1930
    In Hogan v. Twin City A. T. Estate, 155 Minn. 199 , , compensation was denied by the commission for a fibroid tumor which it was claimed had been aggravated by an accident.
  • Olson v. Carlton 225 N.W. 921 Minn. 1929
  • Olson v. Carlton 225 N.W. 921 Minn. 1929
    This court in Hogan v. Twin City A. T. Estate, 155 Minn. 199, 201 , , stated: “The testimony being in conflict, an issue of fact was present and the determination of the question was for the referee, and, on appeal from the referee, for the commission.” On appeal to the commission from the action of the referee the commission is a fact-finding body, and its jurisd
  • Reardon v. City of Austin 219 N.W. 292 Minn. 1928
  • Reardon v. City of Austin 219 N.W. 292 Minn. 1928
    Rau v. District Court, 138 Minn. 250 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 918; Hogan v. Twin City A. T. Est. 155 Minn. 199 , ; Klika v. Ind.
  • Valeri v. Village of Hibbing 211 N.W. 8 Minn. 1926
  • Valeri v. Village of Hibbing 211 N.W. 8 Minn. 1926
    Jefferson v. District Court, 138 Minn. 334 , ; Hogan v. Twin City Amusement Trust Est. 155 Minn. 199 , ; Gaetz v. City of Melrose, 155 Minn. 330 , ; Babich v. Oliver Iron Min.
  • Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co. 209 N.W. 635 Minn. 1926
  • Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co. 209 N.W. 635 Minn. 1926
    State v. District Court, 138 Minn. 334 , ; Hogan v. Twin City A. T. E. 155 Minn. 199 , ; Gaetz v. Melrose, 155 Minn. 330 , ; Babich v. Oliver I. M. Co. 157 Minn. 122 , , ; Maxon v. Swift & Co. 158 Minn. 491 , ; Klika v. Ind.
  • Klika v. Independent School District No. 79 202 N.W. 30 Minn. 1925
  • Klika v. Independent School District No. 79 202 N.W. 30 Minn. 1925
    Hogan v. Twin City, Amusement Trust Estate, 155 Minn. 199 , ; Peoria Ry.
  • Maxon v. Swift & Co. 198 N.W. 133 Minn. 1924
  • Maxon v. Swift & Co. 198 N.W. 133 Minn. 1924
    Hogan v. Twin City T. E. 155 Minn. 199 , ; Gaetz v. City of Melrose, 155 Minn. 330 , .
  • Babich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 195 N.W. 784 Minn. 1923
  • Babich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 195 N.W. 784 Minn. 1923
    Hogan v. Twin City Trust Est. 155 Minn. 199 , ; Casper Cone Co. v. Industrial Com.