Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hawkins v. Kronick Cleaning & Laundry Co., 195 N.W. 766.
- Hestad v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Company 204 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 1973
-
Hestad v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Company
204 N.W.2d 433
Minn. 1973
In discussing this presumption, our court in Hawkins v. Kronick Cleaning & Laundry Co. 157 Minn. 33, 37 , , 36 A. L. R. 394, 396 (1923), said: “* * * Given only the fact of death, the presumption against suicide is controlling.
- Wanda Gladys Beach v. American Steel & Wire Division of United States Steel Corp. & State Treasurer 78 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1956
-
Wanda Gladys Beach v. American Steel & Wire Division of United States Steel Corp. & State Treasurer
78 N.W.2d 371
Minn. 1956
Co. 172 Minn. 185 , ; Hawkins v. Kronick Cleaning & Laundry Co. 157 Minn. 33 , , 36 A. L. R. 394; Sentieri v. Oliver Iron Min.
- Scott v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 282 N.W. 467 Minn. 1938
-
Scott v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
282 N.W. 467
Minn. 1938
Hawkins v. Kronick C. & L. Co. 157 Minn. 33 , , 36 A. L. R. 394; see Luce v. G. N. Ry.
- Luce v. Great Northern Railway Co. 281 N.W. 812 Minn. 1938
-
Luce v. Great Northern Railway Co.
281 N.W. 812
Minn. 1938
Hawkins v. Kronick C. & L. Co. 157 Minn. 33, 36 , , 36 A. L. R. 394, following Lincoln v. French, 105 U. S. 614 , 26 L. ed. 1189.
- Sentieri v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 276 N.W. 210 Minn. 1937
-
Sentieri v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.
276 N.W. 210
Minn. 1937
Co. v. District Court (Arko case), 138 Minn. 138 , ; Hawkins v. Kronick Cleaning & Laundry Co. 157 Minn. 33 , , 36 A. L. R. 394; Samsa v. Hanna Ore Min.
- Hack v. Johnson 275 N.W. 381 Minn. 1937
-
Hack v. Johnson
275 N.W. 381
Minn. 1937
In Hawkins v. Kronick C. L. Co. 157 Minn. 33 , 195 N.W.
- Oxborough v. the Murphy Transfer Storage Co 260 N.W. 305 Minn. 1935
- Faber v. Herdliska 260 N.W. 500 Minn. 1935
-
Oxborough v. the Murphy Transfer Storage Co
260 N.W. 305
Minn. 1935
In re Hawkins v. Kronick C. & L. Co. 157 Minn. 33 , .
-
Faber v. Herdliska
260 N.W. 500
Minn. 1935
Co. 230 Mass. 370 , 119 N. E. 757 , L. R. A. 1918E, 680; Hawkins v. Kronick C. & L. Co. 157 Minn. 33 , .
- Backstrom v. New York Life Insurance 259 N.W. 681 Minn. 1935
-
Backstrom v. New York Life Insurance
259 N.W. 681
Minn. 1935
Until Hawkins v. Kronick C. & L. Co. 157 Minn. 33 , , it was the rule in this -state that the defendant, to sustain the burden against suicide, had to negative every reasonable hypothesis of natural or accidental death.
- Gross v. General Investment Co. 259 N.W. 557 Minn. 1935
-
Gross v. General Investment Co.
259 N.W. 557
Minn. 1935
There certainly is nothing in Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 154; McMahon v. Flynn, 154 Minn. 326 , ; Hawkins v. Kronick C. & L. Co. 157 Minn. 33 , ; Aubin v. Duluth St.
- Fred G. Clark Co. v. E. C. Warner Co. 247 N.W. 225 Minn. 1933
-
Fred G. Clark Co. v. E. C. Warner Co.
247 N.W. 225
Minn. 1933
Our conclusion here renders it unnecessary for us to discuss Hawkins v. Kronick C. & L. Co. 157 Minn. 33, 38 , , in relation to the degree of proof that constitutes a fair preponderance in a usury case.
- Anderson v. McGowan 244 N.W. 816 Minn. 1932
-
Anderson v. McGowan
244 N.W. 816
Minn. 1932
In our opinion the case is controlled by Hawkins v. Kronick C. & L. Co. 157 Minn. 33 , .
- Lausche v. Denison-Harding Chevrolet Co. 243 N.W. 52 Minn. 1932
- Manley v. Harvey Lumber Co. 221 N.W. 913 Minn. 1928
-
Manley v. Harvey Lumber Co.
221 N.W. 913
Minn. 1928
Hawkins v. Kronick C. & L. Co. 157 Minn. 33 , .
- Samsa v. Hanna Ore Mining Co. 214 N.W. 775 Minn. 1927
-
Samsa v. Hanna Ore Mining Co.
214 N.W. 775
Minn. 1927
In Hawkins v. Kronick C. & L. Co. 157 Minn. 33 , , a finding by the industrial commission that death was the result of suicide was sustained.
- Garbush v. New York Life Insurance Co. 214 N.W. 795 Minn. 1927
-
Garbush v. New York Life Insurance Co.
214 N.W. 795
Minn. 1927
In Hawkins v. Kronick C. & L. Co. 157 Minn. 33 , , we considered Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F. 100 Minn. 87 , , 8 L.R.A.(N.S.)
- Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co. 211 N.W. 580 Minn. 1926
-
Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co.
211 N.W. 580
Minn. 1926
In re Hawkins v. Kronick C. & L. Co. 157 Minn. 33 , .
- Bailey v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 207 N.W. 26 Minn. 1926
-
Bailey v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
207 N.W. 26
Minn. 1926
Lincoln v. French, 105 U.S. 614 , 26 L. ed. 1189 , considered here in Hawkins v. Kronick C. L. Co. 157 Minn. 33 , 38 , 195 N.W.