Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bergquist v. Kreidler, 196 N.W. 964.

39 citing documents.

Kallok v. Medtronic, Inc. 573 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1998
Kallok v. Medtronic, Inc. 573 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1998
Prior Lake State Bank v. Groth, 259 Minn. 495, 500 , Tarnowski v. Resop, 236 Minn. 33, 39-40 , Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127, 130 , 196 N.W.
Gilchrist v. Perl 387 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1986
Gilchrist v. Perl 387 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1986
See also Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127 , 196 N.W.
In Re Commodore Hotel Fire & Explosion Cases 324 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1982
In Re Commodore Hotel Fire & Explosion Cases 324 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1982
See also Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127 , 196 N.W.
First Fiduciary Corp. v. Blanco 276 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1979
First Fiduciary Corp. v. Blanco 276 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1979
244 Minn. 62, 70 , — “ * * * where the wrongful act of the defendant thrusts the plaintiff into litigation with a third person, the plaintiff may recover from the defendant the expenses incurred in conducting the litigation against the third party, including attorneys’ fees.” See also Hill v. Okay Construction Co., Inc., Minn. Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127 , 196 N.W.
Chris/Rob Realty v. Chrysler Realty Corp. 260 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 1977
Chris/Rob Realty v. Chrysler Realty Corp. 260 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 1977
*460 Furthermore, respondents’ reliance on Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127 , 196 N.W.
Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc. 252 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1977
Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc. 252 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1977
Prior Lake State Bank v. Groth, 259 Minn. 495 , Tarnowski v. Resop, 236 Minn. 33 , Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127
Strouth v. Wilkison 224 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 1974
Strouth v. Wilkison 224 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 1974
Lowrey v. Dingmann, supra; Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127
Peters v. Fenner 199 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1972
Peters v. Fenner 199 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1972
There, however, the court found that the party against whom the fees were assessed “wrongfully and without cause or justification sought to avoid performance of its obligations under the agreement.” In allowing attorneys’ fees, we relied on Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127
Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing Corporation 149 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1967
Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing Corporation 149 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1967
As was said in Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127, 133 , , 966: “* * * We cannot say that, in the situation they were placed by appellant’s misrepresentation, [respondent] should have adopted any other course than [he] did.” The jury was free to find that the damage sustained during the entire 16-month period was attributable to the misrepresentation be
Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc. 128 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1964
Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc. 128 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1964
An allowance made under *196 somewhat similar circumstances was approved in Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127 , .
Prior Lake State Bank v. Groth 108 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1961
Prior Lake State Bank v. Groth 108 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1961
Restatement, Torts, § 914, states the rule as follows: “A person who through the tort of another has been required to act in the protection of his interests by bringing or defending an action against a third person is entitled to recover * * * for the reasonably necessary * * * attorney fees and other expenditures * * * incurred.” This principle is recognized in Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127, 132 , , where this court stated: “* * * the litigation in which plaintiffs became involved was th
Lowrey v. Dingmann 86 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 1957
Lowrey v. Dingmann 86 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 1957
2 Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127 , .
State v. Sandefur 82 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1957
State v. Sandefur 82 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1957
State v. Scott, supra; State v. Green, 158 Minn. 127 , ; State v. Jacobson, 130 Minn. 347 , .
Dworsky v. Vermes Credit Jewelry, Inc. 69 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1955
Dworsky v. Vermes Credit Jewelry, Inc. 69 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1955
Tarnowski v. Resop, 236 Minn. 33 , 51 N. W. (2d) 801 , 37 Minn. L. Rev. 401 ; Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127 , ; Turner v. Zip Motors, Inc. (Iowa) 65 N. W. (2d) 427 ; Indiana Nat.
Wojahn v. Faul 64 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1954
Wojahn v. Faul 64 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1954
Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127 , ; Fritz v. Pusey, 31 Minn. 368 , ; Annotations, 105 A. L. R. 737 and 61 A. L. R. 161.
Tarnowski v. Resop 51 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1952
Tarnowski v. Resop 51 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1952
The general rule is given in Eestatement, Torts, § 910, as follows: “A person, injured by the tort of another is entitled to recover damages from him for all harm, past, present and prospective, legally caused by the tort.” Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127 , , involved an action to recover attorneys’ fees expended by plaintiffs in an action seeking to enforce and protect their right to the possession of real estate.
Dickinson & Gillespie, Inc. v. Kirkwood 283 N.W. 725 Minn. 1939
Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. McClure 254 N.W. 913 Minn. 1934
Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. McClure 254 N.W. 913 Minn. 1934
So the case of Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127 , , cannot give plaintiff any stand ing in court as against defendant.
Smith v. Chaffee 232 N.W. 515 Minn. 1930
Smith v. Chaffee 232 N.W. 515 Minn. 1930
The case of Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127 , , comes within an exception sometimes noted to the general rule, in that in that case there had been no prior litigation between the same parties; but plaintiffs sought to recover expenses a'nd attorney’s fees incurred by them in a litigation with third parties, which litigation was held to be the dire
Stickney v. Goward 201 N.W. 630 Minn. 1925
Stickney v. Goward 201 N.W. 630 Minn. 1925
Counsel for plaintiff base the right of recovery upon Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127 , , and the cases therein cited.