Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Klika v. Independent School District No. 79, 202 N.W. 30.
- Dudovitz v. Shoppers City, Inc. 164 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1969
- Balow v. Kellogg Cooperative Creamery Association 78 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1956
-
Balow v. Kellogg Cooperative Creamery Association
78 N.W.2d 430
Minn. 1956
No. 79, 161 Minn. 461 , .
- Romani v. Ancker Hospital 69 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1955
-
Romani v. Ancker Hospital
69 N.W.2d 497
Minn. 1955
No. 79, 161 Minn. 461 , .
- Marsolek v. Miller Waste Mills 69 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1955
-
Marsolek v. Miller Waste Mills
69 N.W.2d 617
Minn. 1955
No. 79, 161 Minn. 461 , ; Maxon v. Swift & Co. 158 Minn. 491 , ; Babich v. Oliver I. Min.
- Kaplan v. Alpha Epsilon Phi Sorority 42 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1950
-
Kaplan v. Alpha Epsilon Phi Sorority
42 N.W.2d 342
Minn. 1950
161 Minn. 461 , ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
- Kemling v. Armour & Co. 24 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1946
-
Kemling v. Armour & Co.
24 N.W.2d 842
Minn. 1946
161 Minn. 461, 464 , , as follows: “Finally, though the employe is predisposed to what is commonly called a rupture, though there is a lack of physical integrity of the parts so that a rupture is likely to result some time, though he has a congenital or acquired condition favorable to its development, if an unusual
- Ogren v. City of Duluth 18 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1945
- Ogren v. City of Duluth 18 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1945
- Caddy v. R. Maturi & Co. 14 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1944
-
Caddy v. R. Maturi & Co.
14 N.W.2d 393
Minn. 1944
161 Minn. 461, 464 , , relating to an employe predisposed to hernia, wherein this court stated: “Finally, though the employe is predisposed to what is commonly called a rupture, though there is a lack of physical integrity of the parts so that a rupture is likely to result some time, though he has *213 a congenital
- Haller v. Northern Pump Co. 8 N.W.2d 464 Minn. 1943
-
Haller v. Northern Pump Co.
8 N.W.2d 464
Minn. 1943
161 Minn. 461, 463, 464 , , the application of the rule is set forth as follows: “That the relator may have been predisposed to hernia, that there was, using the language of respondent’s witness, ‘some previous condition that would bring it about,’ does not prevent compensation.
- Schwendig v. Anderson & Hedwall Co. 289 N.W. 772 Minn. 1940
- Schwendig v. Anderson & Hedwall Co. 289 N.W. 772 Minn. 1940
- Stanton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 263 N.W. 433 Minn. 1935
-
Distinguished
Stanton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
263 N.W. 433
Minn. 1935
No. 79, 161 Minn. 461, 462 , , the employe was pushing a heavily loaded wheelbarrow through “sticky gumbo.” According to his own testimony, the wheel “went in a hole, got locked full of dirt, and I pushed him with all my strength, then I felt a kind of pain in my side right away * * * and something tear right on the side here.
- Clark v. Banner Grain Co. 261 N.W. 596 Minn. 1935
- Clark v. Banner Grain Co. 261 N.W. 596 Minn. 1935
- Susnik v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 258 N.W. 23 Minn. 1934
-
Susnik v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.
258 N.W. 23
Minn. 1934
161 Minn. 461 , ; 6 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
- Duchant v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 256 N.W. 905 Minn. 1934
-
Duchant v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.
256 N.W. 905
Minn. 1934
No. 79, 161 Minn. 461 , ; Zobitz v. Oliver I. Min.
- Brajan v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 232 N.W. 342 Minn. 1930
-
Brajan v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.
232 N.W. 342
Minn. 1930
No. 79, 161 Minn. 461 , ; Frederickson v. Burns Lbr.
- Bauman v. Roth Downs Manufacturing Co. 224 N.W. 459 Minn. 1929
-
Bauman v. Roth Downs Manufacturing Co.
224 N.W. 459
Minn. 1929
No. 79, 161 Minn. 461 , .
- Kallgren v. C. W. Lunquist Co. 216 N.W. 241 Minn. 1927
-
Kallgren v. C. W. Lunquist Co.
216 N.W. 241
Minn. 1927
161 Minn. 461 , ; Young v. Western F. & M. Co. 101 Neb.
- Valeri v. Village of Hibbing 211 N.W. 8 Minn. 1926
- Valeri v. Village of Hibbing 211 N.W. 8 Minn. 1926
- Dippold v. F. B. Canada Lumber Co. 210 N.W. 876 Minn. 1926
-
Dippold v. F. B. Canada Lumber Co.
210 N.W. 876
Minn. 1926
161 Minn. 461 , ; Frederickson v. Burns Lbr.
- Miller v. Aetna Insurance 209 N.W. 887 Minn. 1926
-
Miller v. Aetna Insurance
209 N.W. 887
Minn. 1926
161 Minn. 461 , ; Frederickson v. Burns L. Co. 163 Minn. 394 , ; Wilkins v. Ben’s Home Oil Co. 166 Minn. 41 , ; Klika v. Independent School Dist.
- Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co. 209 N.W. 635 Minn. 1926
-
Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co.
209 N.W. 635
Minn. 1926
161 Minn. 461 , ; Klika v. Ind.
- Zobitz v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 209 N.W. 313 Minn. 1926
-
Zobitz v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.
209 N.W. 313
Minn. 1926
161 Minn. 461 , ; Frederickson v. Burns Lbr.
- Wilkins v. Ben's Home Oil Co. 207 N.W. 183 Minn. 1926
- Klika v. Independent School District No. 79 207 N.W. 185 Minn. 1926
- Wilkins v. Ben's Home Oil Co. 207 N.W. 183 Minn. 1926
- Klika v. Independent School District No. 79 207 N.W. 185 Minn. 1926
- Austin v. Red Wing Sewer Pipe Co. 204 N.W. 323 Minn. 1925
- Frederickson v. Burns Lumber Co. 204 N.W. 161 Minn. 1925
-
Austin v. Red Wing Sewer Pipe Co.
204 N.W. 323
Minn. 1925
No. 79, 161 Minn. 461 , .