DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sieger v. Sieger, 202 N.W. 742.

25 citing documents.

  • USCC Services, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • Peterson v. Holiday Recreational Industries, Inc. 726 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • Peterson v. Holiday Recreational Industries, Inc. 726 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
    A constructive trust “arises by operation of law without any reference to any actual or supposed intention of creating a trust and frequently directly contrary to such intention.” Sieger v. Sieger, 162 Minn. 322, 324 , 202 N.W.
  • Freundschuh v. Freundschuh 559 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • Freundschuh v. Freundschuh 559 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
    See Sieger v. Sieger, 162 Minn. 322, 324 , 202 N.W.
  • Gerdin v. Princeton State Bank 414 N.W.2d 765 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Gerdin v. Princeton State Bank 414 N.W.2d 765 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    See Sieger v. Sieger, 162 Minn. 322 , 202 N.W.
  • Thompson v. Nesheim 159 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1968
  • Thompson v. Nesheim 159 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1968
    See, Scott, supra; Sieger v. Sieger, 162 Minn. 322 , , 42 A. L. R. 1; Restatement, Restitution, § 202; 4 Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence (5 ed.) § 1051; Humphreys v. Butler, 51 Ark.
  • Georgopolis v. George 54 N.W.2d 137 Minn. 1952
  • Georgopolis v. George 54 N.W.2d 137 Minn. 1952
    In Sieger v. Sieger, 162 Minn. 322, 327 , , 42 A. L. R. 1, we said that a party seeking to have a trust declared need not have paid all of the consideration for the property; “it is sufficient if he pays a definite or aliquot part thereof.” However, in the case at bar defendant denied that anyone other than he himself contributed to
  • Bastian v. Brink 45 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1951
  • Bastian v. Brink 45 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1951
    Thus, at times this court has given relief to a purchaser of land as against an unconscionable grantee holding title in abuse of a confidential relationship or specific instructions by imposing a constructive trust upon the property (Sieger v. Sieger, 162 Minn. 322 , , 42 A. L. R. 1; Knox v. Knox, 222 Minn. 477, 484 , 25 N. W. [2d] 225, 229-230; see, Luse v. Reed, 63 Minn. 5 , ); by specifically enforcing a partially performed parol trust agreement (Wentworth v. Wentworth, 2 Minn. 238 [277] [but
  • Knox v. Knox 25 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1946
  • Knox v. Knox 25 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1946
    See, Sieger v. Sieger, 162 Minn. 322, 324 , , 42 A. L. R. 1; 23 Minn. L. Rev. 706 , 708; 25 Minn. L. Rev. 716 -717; Minn. St.
  • Crowley v. Crowley 18 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1945
  • Crowley v. Crowley 18 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1945
    *352 In Sieger v. Sieger, 162 Minn. 322 , , 42 A. L. R. 1, plaintiff, prior to his divorce, entrusted his wife with the purchase of certain real estate upon which they were living, in the belief that she would take title thereto in his name as grantee.
  • State v. One Buick Sedan Automobile 12 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1943
  • State v. One Buick Sedan Automobile 12 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1943
    Sieger v. Sieger, 162 Minn. 322 , , 42 A. L. R. 1; Werle v. Werle, 332 Pa.
  • Wunder v. Wunder 244 N.W. 682 Minn. 1932
  • Wunder v. Wunder 244 N.W. 682 Minn. 1932
    Sieger v. Sieger, 162 Minn. 322 , , 12 A. L. R. 1; 3 Pomeroy, Eq.
  • Renville State Bank v. Lentz, Jr. 214 N.W. 467 Minn. 1927
  • Renville State Bank v. Lentz, Jr. 214 N.W. 467 Minn. 1927
    Trusts ex maleficio stand on the latter footing and arise “purely by construction in equity and are independent of any actual or presumed intention of the parties.” Sieger v. Sieger, 162 Minn. 322 , , 42 A. L. R. 1.
  • Leach v. Leach 209 N.W. 636 Minn. 1926
  • Leach v. Leach 209 N.W. 636 Minn. 1926
    This case however cannot be classed with those cases where a court of equity will trace money after a wrongful conversion and impose a trust on the prop *493 erty acquired by it; or where there is a violation of a trust such as in Sieger v. Sieger, 162 Minn. 322 , .