Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Meehan v. Empie, 204 N.W. 572.

36 citing documents.

Community Action Partnership of Scott, Carver & Dakota Counties, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-74 (Minn. 1925) (“Courts do not determine public policy when the Legislature speaks.”).
Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson 929 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 2019
Dukowitz v. Hannon Security Services 841 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 2014
Dukowitz v. Hannon Security Services 841 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 2014
Meehan v. Empie, 164 Minn. 14, 17 , 204 N.W.
Holmes v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF WABASHA CTY. 402 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Holmes v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF WABASHA CTY. 402 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Meehan v. Empie, 164 Minn. 14, 18-19 , 204 N.W.
Phillips v. St. Paul Human & Civil Rights Commission 151 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1967
Phillips v. St. Paul Human & Civil Rights Commission 151 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1967
Meehan v. Empie, 164 Minn. 14 , .
State Ex Rel. Sprague v. Heise 67 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1954
State Ex Rel. Sprague v. Heise 67 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1954
Meehan v. Empie, 164 Minn. 14, 19 , , we held that a market master in charge of markets and market houses was not a head of a department, following the trial court’s finding that any person of average intelligence and fairly pleasant disposition could handle the position and that it was “just one step above a common labor job.”
State Ex Rel. Blaski v. Fisher 259 N.W. 694 Minn. 1935
State Ex Rel. Blaski v. Fisher 259 N.W. 694 Minn. 1935
*79 Meehan v. Empie, 164 Minn. 14 , .
County Board of Education for Unorganized Territory v. Borgen 259 N.W. 67 Minn. 1935
State Ex Rel. Cote v. Village of Bovey 254 N.W. 456 Minn. 1934
State Ex Rel. Cote v. Village of Bovey 254 N.W. 456 Minn. 1934
Meehan v. Empie, 164 Minn. 14 , ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Bloomquist v. Barker 251 N.W. 673 Minn. 1933
State Ex Rel. Bloomquist v. Barker 251 N.W. 673 Minn. 1933
Meehan v. Empie, 164 Minn. 14 , , we rejected the theory of comparative qualifications as between a soldier applicant and others with no record of military service.
State Ex Rel. Kangas v. McDonald 246 N.W. 900 Minn. 1933
State Ex Rel. Kangas v. McDonald 246 N.W. 900 Minn. 1933
Meehan v. Empie, 164 Minn. 14 , ; 4 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
State Ex Rel. Abati v. MacDonald 240 N.W. 361 Minn. 1932
State Ex Rel. Abati v. MacDonald 240 N.W. 361 Minn. 1932
Meehan v. Empie, 164 Minn. 14 , ,- it was held that the right to preferment depended upon efficiency and not upon relative efficiency.
State Ex Rel. Kinler v. Rines 239 N.W. 670 Minn. 1931
State Ex Rel. Kinler v. Rines 239 N.W. 670 Minn. 1931
Meehan v. Empie, 164 Minn. 14 , ; 4 Bunnell, Minn. Big.
Holmquist v. Independent School District 231 N.W. 406 Minn. 1930
Holmquist v. Independent School District 231 N.W. 406 Minn. 1930
Meehan v. Empie, 164 Minn. 14 , .
Millett v. City of Hastings 229 N.W. 346 Minn. 1930
No. 1, 164 Minn. 66 , ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Trevarthen v. City of Eveleth 228 N.W. 447 Minn. 1929
State Ex Rel. Trevarthen v. City of Eveleth 228 N.W. 447 Minn. 1929
Meehan v. Empie, 164 Minn. 14 , .
State Ex Rel. Moilan v. Brandt 226 N.W. 841 Minn. 1929
State Ex Rel. Moilan v. Brandt 226 N.W. 841 Minn. 1929
Meehan v. Empie, 164 Minn. 14 , , this statute was under consideration and the position there involved Avas the one now involved.
State Ex Rel. Castel v. Village of Chisholm 217 N.W. 681 Minn. 1928
State Ex Rel. Castel v. Village of Chisholm 217 N.W. 681 Minn. 1928
Meehan v. Empie, 164 Minn. 14, 19 , .
Szroka v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. 213 N.W. 557 Minn. 1927
164 Minn. 66 , , and cases cited.
State Ex Rel. v. City Council of Minneapolis 208 N.W. 1005 Minn. 1926
State Ex Rel. v. City Council of Minneapolis 208 N.W. 1005 Minn. 1926
v. Empie, 164 Minn. 14 , .
Consolidated School District No. 30 v. Christison 208 N.W. 409 Minn. 1926
No. 1, Polk County, 164 Minn. 66 , ; State ex rel.