Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. v. Houghton, 204 N.W. 569.

53 citing documents.

County of Pine v. State, Department of Natural Resources 280 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1979
County of Pine v. State, Department of Natural Resources 280 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1979
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146, 150 , 204 N.W.
County of Freeborn v. Claussen 203 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1972
County of Freeborn v. Claussen 203 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1972
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012 (1925), affirmed per curiam, 273 U. S. 671 , 47 S. Ct. 474 , 71 L. ed. 832 (1927); State ex rel.
State v. Larson 195 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1972
State v. Larson 195 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1972
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146, 151 , 204 N.W.
O'BRIEN v. City of Saint Paul 173 N.W.2d 462 Minn. 1969
O'BRIEN v. City of Saint Paul 173 N.W.2d 462 Minn. 1969
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146, 149 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012, where we said: “* * * In large cities, where the lots for residences must necessarily be of the minimum size, especially where the man of small means must dwell, it is readily seen that if a home is built on such a lot and thereafter three-story apartments extending to the
Sanderson v. City of Willmar 162 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1968
Sanderson v. City of Willmar 162 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1968
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012.
Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of Minnetonka 162 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 1968
Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of Minnetonka 162 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 1968
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012, affirmed, 273 U. S. 671 , 47 S. Ct. 474 , 71 L. ed. 833, in which this court specifically reversed its prior contrary opinions.
A. C. E. Equipment Co. v. Erickson 152 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1967
A. C. E. Equipment Co. v. Erickson 152 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1967
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012, 10 Minn. L. Rev. 54 , sustained the validity of the original Minneapolis zoning ordinance adopted in the same manner as the ordinance in the instant case.
Filister v. City of Minneapolis 133 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1964
Filister v. City of Minneapolis 133 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1964
Berry v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146, 149 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012, affirmed, 273 U. S. 671 , 47 S. Ct. 474 , 71 L. ed. 832, where we said: “* * * In large cities, where the lots for residences must necessarily be of the minimum size, especially where the man of small means must dwell, it is readily seen that if a home is built on such a l
Olsen v. City of Minneapolis 115 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1962
Olsen v. City of Minneapolis 115 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1962
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012, plaintiff’s property is presently zoned for commercial purposes.
Connor v. Township of Chanhassen 81 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 1957
Connor v. Township of Chanhassen 81 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 1957
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012, affirmed, 273 U. S. 671 , 47 S. Ct. 474 , 71 L. ed. 832.
Hawkins v. Talbot 80 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1957
Hawkins v. Talbot 80 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1957
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012, affirmed, 273 U. S. 671 , 47 S. Ct. 474 , 71 L. ed. 832.
State Ex Rel. Howard v. Village of Roseville 70 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1955
State Ex Rel. Howard v. Village of Roseville 70 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1955
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012, affirmed, 273 U. S. 671 , 47 S. Ct. 474 , 71 L. ed. 832.
Western States Utilities Co. v. City of Waseca 65 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1954
Western States Utilities Co. v. City of Waseca 65 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1954
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012, affirmed, 273 U. S. 671 , 47 S. Ct. 474 , 71 L. ed. 832; Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U. S. 27 , 5 S. Ct. 357 , 28 L. ed. 923; Camfield v. United States, 167 U. S. 518 , 17 S. Ct. 864 , 42 L. ed. 260; Sligh v. Kirkwood, 237 U. S. 52 , 35 S. Ct. 501 , 59 L. ed. 835; Price v. Illinois, 23
Kiges v. City of St. Paul 62 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 1953
Kiges v. City of St. Paul 62 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 1953
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146, 150 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012: “* * * The police power, in its nature indefinable, and quickly responsive, in the interest of common welfare, to changing conditions, authorizes various restrictions upon the use of private property as social and economic changes come.
State Ex Rel. Sheffield v. City of Minneapolis 50 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1951
State Ex Rel. Sheffield v. City of Minneapolis 50 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1951
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012, affirmed, 273 U. S. 671 , 47 S. Ct. 474 , 71 L. ed. 832.
Oscar P. Gustafson Co. v. City of Minneapolis 42 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1950
Oscar P. Gustafson Co. v. City of Minneapolis 42 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1950
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146, 151 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012, we said: “Finally, the exercise of the police power is legislative.
The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna 24 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1946
The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna 24 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1946
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146 , 204 N.W.
Orme v. Atlas Gas and Oil Co. 13 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1944
State v. Modern Box Makers, Inc. 13 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1944
Orme v. Atlas Gas and Oil Co. 13 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1944
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012; Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. 272 U. S. 365 , 47 S. Ct. 114 , 71 L. ed. 303, 54 A. L. R. 1016.
State v. Modern Box Makers, Inc. 13 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1944
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146, 148 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012, where this court held that zoning should preferably be exercised under the police power, it said: “If restricted residential districts are to be established, there are substantial reasons why the result should be accomplished through the exercise of the police power.” Other que
State v. Northwest Linseed Co. 297 N.W. 635 Minn. 1941
State v. Northwest Linseed Co. 297 N.W. 635 Minn. 1941
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012, where at page 151 the court said: “The exercise of the police power is legislative.
State v. Miller 288 N.W. 713 Minn. 1939
State v. Miller 288 N.W. 713 Minn. 1939
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012, and in Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. 272 U. S. 365 , 47 S. Ct. 114 , 71 L. ed. 303, 54 A. L. R. 1016.
State Ex Rel. Pavlik v. Johannes 259 N.W. 537 Minn. 1935
Gunderson v. Anderson 251 N.W. 515 Minn. 1933
Gunderson v. Anderson 251 N.W. 515 Minn. 1933
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012, and other cases.
Blaisdell v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n 249 N.W. 334 Minn. 1933
Blaisdell v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n 249 N.W. 334 Minn. 1933
Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012; Sligh v. Kirkwood, 237 U. S. 52 , 35 S. Ct. 501, 502 , 59 L. ed. 835; Price v. Illinois, 238 U. S. 446 , 35 S. Ct. 892 , 59 L. ed. 1400; Perley v. North Carolina, 249 U. S. 510 , 39 S. Ct. 357 , 63 L. ed. 735; Miller v. Schoene, 276 U. S. 272 , 48 S. Ct. 246 , 72 L. ed. 568.
State Ex Rel. Madsen v. Houghton 233 N.W. 831 Minn. 1930
State Ex Rel. Madsen v. Houghton 233 N.W. 831 Minn. 1930
Berry v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146 , , 54 A. L. R. 1012.
State ex rel. McKusick v. Houghton 213 N.W. 907 Minn. 1927