Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bohrer v. Village of Inver Grove, 207 N.W. 721.

25 citing documents.

Sletten v. Ramsey County 675 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 2004
Sletten v. Ramsey County 675 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 2004
In support of their argument, the Slet-tens rely on this court’s decisions in Highview N. Apartments, Bohrer v. Village of Inver Grove, 166 Minn. 336 , 207 N.W.
American Automobile Insurance v. City of Minneapolis 107 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1961
American Automobile Insurance v. City of Minneapolis 107 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1961
Hahn v. City of Ortonville, 238 Minn. 428 , 57 N. W. (2d) 254 ; Bohrer v. Village of Inver Grove, 166 Minn. 336 , ; Christiansen & Sons, Inc. v. City of Duluth, 225 Minn. 475 , 31 N. W. (2d) 270 .
Lund v. Village of Princeton 85 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1957
Lund v. Village of Princeton 85 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1957
Bohrer v. Village of Inver Grove, 166 Minn. 336 , ; H. Christiansen & Sons, Inc. v. City of Duluth, 225 Minn. 475 , 31 N. W. (2d) 270 .
Johnson v. County of Steele 60 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1953
Johnson v. County of Steele 60 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1953
222 ; Bohrer v. Village of Inver Grove, 166 Minn. 336 , 207 N.W.
Hahn v. City of Ortonville 57 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1953
Hahn v. City of Ortonville 57 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1953
15 Bohrer v. Village of Inver Grove, 166 Minn. 336 , ; see, Maylone v. City of St.
H. Christiansen & Sons, Inc. v. City of Duluth 31 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1948
H. Christiansen & Sons, Inc. v. City of Duluth 31 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1948
Power v. Village of Hibbing, 182 Minn. 66 , ; Nienow v. Village of Mapleton, 144 Minn. 60 , ; Bohrer v. Village of Inver Grove, 166 Minn. 336 , ; Johnson v. City of Fairmont, 188 Minn. 451 , .
Roche v. City of Minneapolis 27 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1947
Johnson v. City of Fairmont 247 N.W. 572 Minn. 1933
Johnson v. City of Fairmont 247 N.W. 572 Minn. 1933
This point, however, was not raised in Bohrer v. Village of Inver Grove, 166 Minn. 336 , .
Power v. Village of Hibbing 233 N.W. 597 Minn. 1930
Power v. Village of Hibbing 233 N.W. 597 Minn. 1930
Paul, 56 Minn. 527 , , 45 A. S. R. 501; Bridgeman-Russell Co. v. City of Duluth, 158 Minn. 509 , ; Bohrer v. Village of Inver Grove, 166 Minn. 336 , ; Batcher v. City of Staples, 120 Minn. 86 , ; Hughes v. Village of Nashwauk, 177 Minn. 547 , , and others.
Hughes v. Village of Nashwauk 225 N.W. 898 Minn. 1929
Hughes v. Village of Nashwauk 225 N.W. 898 Minn. 1929
We hold that the statute does not apply to such a case.” In Bohrer v. Village of Inver Grove, 166 Minn. 336 , , the action was at laiv for damages to plaintiff’s property, caused by deposit thereon of sand and dirt from excavations made by defendants and dumped into a ravine, from which it was washed down upon plaintiff’s premises by surface water coming into the ravine.
Bang v. Independent School District No. 27 225 N.W. 449 Minn. 1929
Bang v. Independent School District No. 27 225 N.W. 449 Minn. 1929
Bang v. Independent School District No. 27 225 N.W. 449 Minn. 1929
Paul, 134 Minn. 451 , , L. R. A. 1917B, 548 (negligent condition of public streets); Bohrer v. Village of Inver Grove, 166 Minn. 336 , (village and school district putting sand in a natural ravine'so that it washed upon the premises of the plaintiff); Joyce v. Village of Janesville, 132 Minn. 121 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 426 (discharging sewage of village upon plaintiff’s land); Batcher v. City of Staples, 120 Minn. 86 , 139
Bang v. Independent School District No. 27 225 N.W. 449 Minn. 1929
1917B, 548 (negligent condition of public streets); Bohrer v. Village of Inver Grove, 166 Minn. 336 , 207 N.W.
Hren v. Crete Mining Co. 215 N.W. 853 Minn. 1927
Hren v. Crete Mining Co. 215 N.W. 853 Minn. 1927
Bohrer v. Village of Inver Grove, 166 Minn. 336 , .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by