Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kirby v. Dean, 199 N.W. 174.

28 citing documents.

Spiess v. Brandt 41 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1950
Spiess v. Brandt 41 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1950
Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , ; Gaetke v. Ebarr Co. Inc. 195 Minn. 393 , .
Hatch v. Kulick 1 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1941
Hatch v. Kulick 1 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1941
Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , ; Scheer v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 165 Minn. 54 , .
E. Edelman & Co. v. Queen Stove Works, Inc. 284 N.W. 838 Minn. 1939
E. Edelman & Co. v. Queen Stove Works, Inc. 284 N.W. 838 Minn. 1939
Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , ; Skoog v. Mayer Bros. Co. 122 Minn. 209 , ; Scheer v. Harbaugh Co. 165 Minn. 54 , ; Dohs v. Kerfoot, 183 Minn. 379 , .
Gaetke v. Ebarr Company, Inc. 263 N.W. 448 Minn. 1935
Gaetke v. Ebarr Company, Inc. 263 N.W. 448 Minn. 1935
The vendee was within his legal rights in treating vendor’s failure to give possession as a basis for the rescission of the contract.” *401 In Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , , this court held: ' “One who seeks to rescind or one who has rescinded a contract, because of the fraud of the other party thereto, is not required to prove that he was damaged in order to sustain his right to a rescission.
Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Anderson 253 N.W. 885 Minn. 1934
Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Anderson 253 N.W. 885 Minn. 1934
See also Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , , where the essential difference between the right to damages for fraud and the right to rescind for fraud is attempted to be explained.
Proper v. Proper 237 N.W. 178 Minn. 1931
Proper v. Proper 237 N.W. 178 Minn. 1931
Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , ; Becker v. Nelson, 164 Minn. 367 , ; 12 R. C. L. 408.
Bryant v. Rand 227 N.W. 214 Minn. 1929
Bryant v. Rand 227 N.W. 214 Minn. 1929
Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , .
Magnuson v. Bouck 220 N.W. 702 Minn. 1929
Magnuson v. Bouck 220 N.W. 702 Minn. 1929
Nelson v. Carlson, 54 Minn. 90 , ; Ludowese v. Amidon, 124 Minn. 288 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Fawkes v. Knapp, 138 Minn. 384 , ; Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , ; Saupe v. St.
Premier Investment Co. v. Western Surety Co. 225 N.W. 12 Minn. 1929
Premier Investment Co. v. Western Surety Co. 225 N.W. 12 Minn. 1929
Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , .
Nelson v. Waylander 219 N.W. 451 Minn. 1928
Nelson v. Waylander 219 N.W. 451 Minn. 1928
Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , 199 N.W.
Saupe v. St. Paul Trust Co. 212 N.W. 892 Minn. 1927
Saupe v. St. Paul Trust Co. 212 N.W. 892 Minn. 1927
Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Drake v. Fairmont D. T. & B. Co. 129 Minn. 145 , ; Fawkes v. Knapp, 138 Minn. 384 , ; Labar v. Lindstrom, 158 Minn. 453 , ; Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , .
Scheer v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 205 N.W. 626 Minn. 1925
Scheer v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 205 N.W. 626 Minn. 1925
I. L. Corse & Co. v. Minn. Grain Co. 94 Minn. 331 , ; The Encyclopedia Press, Inc. v. Harris, 140 Minn. 145 , ; *57 Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , ; Williston, Contracts, § 1528.
Becker v. Nelson 205 N.W. 262 Minn. 1925
Becker v. Nelson 205 N.W. 262 Minn. 1925
See 12 R. C. L. p. 408; Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , .
Hirschman v. Healy 202 N.W. 734 Minn. 1925
Hirschman v. Healy 202 N.W. 734 Minn. 1925
Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; MacLaren v. Cochran, 44 Minn. 255 , ; Knappen v. Freeman, 47 Minn. 491 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Fawkes v. Scott, 138 Minn. 384 , ; Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , .