Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite City of Red Wing v. Nibbe, 199 N.W. 918.

28 citing documents.

State v. Tessema 515 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Brown, 297 Minn. 109, 111 , Village of Crosby v. Stemich, 160 Minn. 261, 263 , but see State v. Thomas, 279 Minn. 326, 329
City of St. Paul v. DiBucci 229 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1975
This court concluded, in Village of Crosby v. Stemich, 160 Minn. 261 , that although prosecutions for ordinance violations are treated as civil matters for some purposes, they are to be considered criminal proceedings for purposes of appeal.
Appeal of O'Rourke 220 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1974
Stolp v. Scrimshaw 220 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1974
Appeal of O'Rourke 220 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1974
See, City of Red Wing v. Nibbe, 160 Minn. 274 , 199 N.W.
Stolp v. Scrimshaw 220 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1974
See, City of Red Wing v. Nibbe, 160 Minn. 274 , State ex rel.
City of St. Paul v. Hurd 216 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1974
Louis Park, v. Brown, 297 Minn. 109, 110 , this court stated: “In Village of Crosby v. Stemich, 160 Minn. 261 , this court held that although prosecutions for ordinance violations are considered civil matters for some purposes, they should be considered criminal proceedings for purposes of appeal.
State v. Brown 209 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1973
In Village of Crosby v. Stemich, 160 Minn. 261 , this court held that although prosecutions for ordinance violations are considered civil matters for some purposes, they should be considered criminal proceedings for purposes of appeal.
City of St. Paul v. Whidby 203 N.W.2d 823 Minn. 1972
Village of Crosby v. Stemich, 160 Minn. 261 , City of Madison v. Martin, 109 Minn. 292 , State ex rel.
State v. Hardin 202 N.W.2d 212 Minn. 1972
Village of Crosby v. Stemich, 160 Minn. 261
State v. Thomas 156 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1968
It cites Village of Crosby v. Stemich, 160 Minn. 261 , , which involved an attempted appeal to the district court from a conviction of an ordinance violation, and quotes therefrom ( 160 Minn. 262 , ): “Section 7602, G. S. 1913, as amended by chapter 283, p. 420, Laws 1917, applies to appeals from judgments of justices of the peace in civil actions.
State v. Ettesvold 117 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1962
12; State v. Sexton, 42 Minn. 154 , ; Village of Crosby v. Stemich, 160 Minn 261, .
State v. Ketterer 79 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1956
Salter v. *176 McDonald, 121 Minn. 207 , ; Village of Crosby v. Stemich, 160 Minn. 261 , .
State v. Finley 64 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1954
Paul v. Keeley, 194 Minn. 386 , ; Village of Crosby v. Stemich, 160 Minn. 261 , .
Haugen v. County Commissioners 52 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 1952
Haugen v. County Commissioners 52 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 1952
No. 135 v. McConnell, 150 Minn. 57 , ; City of Red Wing v. Nibbe, 160 Minn. 274 , .
State v. End 45 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1950
State v. End 45 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1950
Paul v. Keeley, 194 Minn. 386 , ; City of Red Wing v. Nibbe, 160 Minn. 274 , .
Wallace v. Board of County Commissioners 35 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1948
Wallace v. Board of County Commissioners 35 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1948
Broberg v. State Board of Control, 183 Minn. 345 , ; City of Red Wing v. Nibbe, 160 Minn. 274 , ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
State v. Jamieson 300 N.W. 809 Minn. 1941
State v. Jamieson 300 N.W. 809 Minn. 1941
te v. Robitshek, 60 Minn. 123, 124 , , 33 L. R. A. 33, it was said: “It has repeatedly been decided by this court, as it has elsewhere, that municipal ordinances are not criminal statutes; that violations thereof are not crimes, nor are such violations governed by the rules of the criminal law, save in certain specified exceptional particulars.” So also in City of Red Wing v. Nibbe, 160 Minn. 274, 275 , , it was held: “It has long been settled that the violation of a city ordinance is not a crim
State Ex Rel. Weich v. City of Red Wing 220 N.W. 611 Minn. 1928
State Ex Rel. Weich v. City of Red Wing 220 N.W. 611 Minn. 1928
Strupp v. Anderson, 165 Minn. 150 , ; City of Red Wing v. Nibbe, 160 Minn. 274 , .
Carter v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 212 N.W. 413 Minn. 1927
Carter v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 212 N.W. 413 Minn. 1927
City of Red Wing v. Nibbe, 160 Minn. 274 , ; State v. Nelson, 157 Minn. 506 , .
State Ex Rel. Strupp v. Anderson 206 N.W. 51 Minn. 1925
State Ex Rel. Strupp v. Anderson 206 N.W. 51 Minn. 1925
or proceedings for any violation of any¡ ordinance” and section 14 enacts that no appeal shall be allowed “from any judgment or ruling of any Justice of the Peace of said City, rendered or- made in any action or prosecution for any violation * * * of any ordinance” and attempts to prohibit the issue of any writ of certiorari “in any such case.” For the reasons stated in City of Red Wing v. Nibbe, 160 Minn. 274 , , the denial of an appeal from a conviction under an ordinance is permissible.