Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Klare v. Peterson, 200 N.W. 817.

46 citing documents.

Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
580 (1926); Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , 200 N.W.
Simeon v. Anderson 66 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1954
Simeon v. Anderson 66 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1954
Guthrie v. Brown, 192 Minn. 434 , ; Reynolds v. Goetze, 192 Minn. 37 , ; Fulweiler v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 184 Minn. 519 , ; Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; Soderberg v. Taney, 152 Minn. 376 , .
Levasseur v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 21 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1946
Levasseur v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 21 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1946
Co. 189 Minn. 22 , 248 N. W. *213 294; Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; Stritzke v. C. G. W. R. Co. 190 Minn. 323 , ; Solberg v. Minneapolis St.
Ranum v. Swenson 19 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1945
Ranum v. Swenson 19 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1945
4 Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16, 18 , .
Fickling v. Nassif 294 N.W. 848 Minn. 1940
Fickling v. Nassif 294 N.W. 848 Minn. 1940
is Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16, 18 , , wherein there was a collision between a motorcycle and a gravel truck.
Oxborough v. the Murphy Transfer Storage Co 260 N.W. 305 Minn. 1935
Oxborough v. the Murphy Transfer Storage Co 260 N.W. 305 Minn. 1935
Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 154.
Guthrie v. Brown 256 N.W. 898 Minn. 1934
Guthrie v. Brown 256 N.W. 898 Minn. 1934
Hillstrom v. Mannheimer Bros. 146 Minn. 202 , ; Soderberg v. Taney, 152 Minn. 376 , ; Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; Primock v. Goldenberg, 161 Minn. 160 , , 37 A. L. R. 484; Joncas v. Minneapolis St.
Williams v. Jungbauer 252 N.W. 658 Minn. 1934
Williams v. Jungbauer 252 N.W. 658 Minn. 1934
Co. 119 Minn. 347 , ; Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; Fink v. N. P. Ry.
Brown v. Raymond Bros. Motor Transportation, Inc. 243 N.W. 112 Minn. 1932
Brown v. Raymond Bros. Motor Transportation, Inc. 243 N.W. 112 Minn. 1932
The following cases in this court sustain the trial court in ruling that the evidence made the defense of plaintiff’s contributory negligence an issue of fact for the jury: Fairchild v. Kilbourne, 152 Minn. 457 , ; Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; Aubin v. Duluth St.
Quinn v. Zimmer 239 N.W. 902 Minn. 1931
Quinn v. Zimmer 239 N.W. 902 Minn. 1931
Co. 161 Minn. 322 , , 16 A. L. R. 993; Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; Tobisch v. Villaume, 164 Minn. 126 , ; Anderson v. Duban, 170 Minn. 155 , ; Rosenthal v. McCulloch, 177 Minn. 523 , ; Reddy v. Rex Oil Co. 182 Minn. 139 , .
Fulweiler v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 N.W. 609 Minn. 1931
Fulweiler v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 N.W. 609 Minn. 1931
Co. 121 Minn. 445 , 141 R. W. 795; Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; Tobisch v. Villaume, 164 Minn. 126 , ; Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo & Brother, 165 Minn. 193 , ; Anderson v. Duban, 170 Minn. 155 , ; Douglas v. Jacobson, 179 Minn. 86 , ; Coffman v. Kummer, 179 Minn. 120 , ; Saunders v. Yellow Cab Co
Peterson v. Doll 238 N.W. 324 Minn. 1931
Peterson v. Doll 238 N.W. 324 Minn. 1931
Plaintiff had a right to assume that the defendant would observe the law of the road and that he would comply with statutory requirements as to stopping, signaling, etc. Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; 42 C. J. 950; Huddy, Automobiles (8 ed.) §§ 383, 483.
Weyhe v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 228 N.W. 754 Minn. 1930
Weyhe v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 228 N.W. 754 Minn. 1930
Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; Aubin v. Duluth St.
Rosenthal v. McCulloch 225 N.W. 651 Minn. 1929
Rosenthal v. McCulloch 225 N.W. 651 Minn. 1929
Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; Bradley v. Minneapolis St.
O'Leary v. Wangensteen 221 N.W. 430 Minn. 1928
O'Leary v. Wangensteen 221 N.W. 430 Minn. 1928
Co. 157 Minn. 122 , , ; West v. First State Bank, 158 Minn. 342 , ; Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; Flikeid v. New York L. Ins.
Campbell v. Nelson 220 N.W. 401 Minn. 1928
Campbell v. Nelson 220 N.W. 401 Minn. 1928
Co. 157 Minn. 122, 124 , ; Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; Smith v. Mason Bros. Co. 174 Minn. 94 , ; 1 & 6 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Eichhorn v. Lundin 216 N.W. 537 Minn. 1927
Eichhorn v. Lundin 216 N.W. 537 Minn. 1927
Co. 169 Minn. 342 , ; Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , .
Rimmer v. Cohen 215 N.W. 198 Minn. 1927
Rimmer v. Cohen 215 N.W. 198 Minn. 1927
Lundberg v. Zimmer, 159 Minn. 179 , ; Quinn v. Heidman, 157 Minn. 129 , ; Meyers v. Swanson, 163 *137 Minn. 508, ; Stallman v. Shea, 99 Minn. 422 , ; Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; Pach v. Chippewa Springs Corp. 161 Minn. 125 , ; Pollock v. McCormick, 169 Minn. 55 , .
Anderson v. Duban 212 N.W. 180 Minn. 1927
Anderson v. Duban 212 N.W. 180 Minn. 1927
Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; Primock v. Goldenberg, 161 Minn. 160 , , 37 A. L. R. 484; Bradley v. M. St.
Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co. 211 N.W. 580 Minn. 1926
Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co. 211 N.W. 580 Minn. 1926
Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , .
Meyers v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 209 N.W. 892 Minn. 1926
Meyers v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 209 N.W. 892 Minn. 1926
Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , , and cases cited.
Sheehan v. First Nat. Bank of Waseca 204 N.W. 38 Minn. 1925
Sheehan v. First Nat. Bank of Waseca 204 N.W. 38 Minn. 1925
Plaintiff invokes the rule applied in Goedhard v. Folstad, 156 Minn. 453 , , and Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , , but we think it is not applicable.
Fink v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 203 N.W. 47 Minn. 1925
Fink v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 203 N.W. 47 Minn. 1925
Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , ; Sheehy v. M. & St.