Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Standard Oil Co. v. Day, 201 N.W. 410.

29 citing documents.

Standard Accident Insurance v. Copper Hills Motor Hotels, Inc. 424 P.2d 154 Ariz. 1967
Elk River Concrete Products Co. v. American Casualty Co. of Reading 129 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 1964
Elk River Concrete Products Co. v. American Casualty Co. of Reading 129 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 1964
In Standard Oil Co. v. Day, 161 Minn. 281 , , 41 A. L. R. 1291, the successful bidder entered a contract with the state and furnished a surety bond.
Dwinnell v. Oftedahl 51 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1952
Dwinnell v. Oftedahl 51 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1952
Matthew, 41 Minn. 392 , , and Standard Oil Co. v. Day, 161 Minn. 281 , , 41 A. L. R. 1291.
Farmers State Bank of Madelia, Inc. v. Burns 4 N.W.2d 330 Minn. 1942
Farmers State Bank of Madelia, Inc. v. Burns 4 N.W.2d 330 Minn. 1942
Co. v. Day, 161 Minn. 281, 285, 286 , , 41 A. L. R. 1291, where, as here, it was claimed the surety had a right to the contractor’s earnings to the extent needed to pay labor and material going into the construction, the court said: “Our public contractor’s bond contemplates that the contractor will receive and disburse his
Mastley v. Moe 258 N.W. 591 Minn. 1935
Mastley v. Moe 258 N.W. 591 Minn. 1935
Standard Oil Co. v. Day, 161 Minn. 281 , , 41 A. L. R. 1291.
A. Y. McDonlald Manufacturing Co. v. Lima 244 N.W. 804 Minn. 1932
A. Y. McDonlald Manufacturing Co. v. Lima 244 N.W. 804 Minn. 1932
L. J. Mueller Furnace Co. v. Burkhart, 149 Minn. 68 , ; Standard Oil Co. v. Day, 161 Minn. 281 , , 41 A. L. R. 1291.
Anderson v. Northwestern Trust Co. 238 N.W. 164 Minn. 1931
Anderson v. Northwestern Trust Co. 238 N.W. 164 Minn. 1931
In Pond & Hasey Co. v. O’Connor, 70 Minn. 266, 270 , 248 , this court said: “It is the rule that an application once rightfully made by either party is conclusive and final; also that the law will not disturb an application made by the parties.” See also Standard Oil Co. v. Day, 161 Minn. 281 , , 41 A. L. R. 1291; Radichel v. Federal Sur.
Radichel v. Federal Surety Co. 226 N.W. 473 Minn. 1929
Radichel v. Federal Surety Co. 226 N.W. 473 Minn. 1929
Standard Oil Co. v. Day, 161 Minn. 281 , , 41 A. L. R. 1291.
Investors Syndicate v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. 223 N.W. 139 Minn. 1929
Investors Syndicate v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. 223 N.W. 139 Minn. 1929
Standard Oil Co. v. Day, 161 Minn. 281 , , 41 A. L. R. 1291; Jefferson v. Church of St.
Standard Salt & Cement Co. v. Commercial Casualty Insurance 213 N.W. 543 Minn. 1927
Standard Salt & Cement Co. v. Commercial Casualty Insurance 213 N.W. 543 Minn. 1927
L. J. Mueller Furnace Co. v. Burkhart, 149 Minn. 68 , ; Standard Oil Co. v. Day, 161 Minn. 281 , , 41 A. L. R. 1291; Radichel v. Federal Sur.
Radichel v. Federal Surety Co. 212 N.W. 171 Minn. 1927
Radichel v. Federal Surety Co. 212 N.W. 171 Minn. 1927
L. J. Mueller Furnace Co. v. Burkhart, 149 Minn. 68 , ; Standard Oil Co. v. Day, 161 Minn; 281, , 41 A. L. R. 1291.
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Federal Construction Co. 209 N.W. 911 Minn. 1926
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Federal Construction Co. 209 N.W. 911 Minn. 1926
Counsel for the bank cite Standard Oil Co. v. Day, 161 Minn. 281 , , 41 A. L. R. 1291, as applicable, but we think it is not.
Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co. 210 N.W. 37 Minn. 1926
Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co. 210 N.W. 37 Minn. 1926
Co. v. Wurtz, 145 Minn. 438 , ; Ganley v. City of Pipestone, 154 Minn. 193 , ; Standard Oil Co. v. Day, 161 Minn. 281 , , 41 A. L. R. 1291; Standard Oil Co. v. Remer, supra, page 352.
Standard Oil Co. v. Remer 209 N.W. 315 Minn. 1926
Standard Oil Co. v. Remer 209 N.W. 315 Minn. 1926
The Barrett case distinguishes Standard Oil Co. v. Day, 161 Minn. 281 , , which is not of particular moment here.
Barrett Bros. Co. v. County of St. Louis 206 N.W. 49 Minn. 1925
Barrett Bros. Co. v. County of St. Louis 206 N.W. 49 Minn. 1925
There is nothing in our recent decision of Standard Oil Co. v. Day, 161 Minn. 281 , , which even touches the instant problem.