Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mathews v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co., 202 N.W. 896.

26 citing documents.

State v. Young 569 P.2d 815 Ariz. 1977
State v. Walker 235 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1975
State v. Walker 235 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1975
Co. 162 Minn. 313 , VI Wigmore on Evidence, § 1873.
Jansen v. Lichwa 474 P.2d 1020 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
State v. Hines 133 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1964
State v. Hines 133 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1964
Co. 162 Minn. 313, 318 , , relied upon by defendant, that this amounted to “a reopening of the main case under the guise of rebuttal.” *39 Defendant’s final contention is that Quiggle’s testimony was inadmissible because it was irrelevant to any issue being tried.
Wilson v. Home Gas Co. Inc. 125 N.W.2d 725 Minn. 1964
Wilson v. Home Gas Co. Inc. 125 N.W.2d 725 Minn. 1964
Co. 162 Minn. 313 , ; Prosser, The Procedural Effect of Res Ipsa Loquitur, 20 Minn, L. Rev. 241.
Maetzold v. Walgreen Co. 83 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1957
Maetzold v. Walgreen Co. 83 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1957
Seeden v. Great Northern Railway Co. 65 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1954
Seeden v. Great Northern Railway Co. 65 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1954
Co. 162 Minn. 313 , ; Sullivan v. Minneapolis St.
Van Tassel v. Patterson 50 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1951
Van Tassel v. Patterson 50 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1951
Co. 162 Minn. 313 , ; Minnesota & Dakota Cattle Co. v. C. & N. W. Ry.
Risberg v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 47 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1951
Risberg v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 47 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1951
Co. 162 Minn. 313, 320 , , we said: “The rule cannot apply, if * * * the accident itself is as suggestive of some other cause as it is of the negligence of the defendant.
State v. Sprague 276 N.W. 744 Minn. 1937
State v. Sprague 276 N.W. 744 Minn. 1937
Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 217 N.W. 102 Minn. 1927
Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 217 N.W. 102 Minn. 1927
Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 217 N.W. 102 Minn. 1927
Co. 162 Minn. 313, 320 , ; O’Rourke v. Marshall Field & Co. 307 Ill.
Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 217 N.W. 102 Minn. 1927
Co. 162 Minn. 313 , 320 , 202 N.W.
Holmgren v. Red Lake Falls Milling Co. 210 N.W. 1000 Minn. 1926
Holmgren v. Red Lake Falls Milling Co. 210 N.W. 1000 Minn. 1926
Co. 162 Minn. 313 , , and cases cited.
Nelson v. Zamboni 204 N.W. 943 Minn. 1925
Nelson v. Zamboni 204 N.W. 943 Minn. 1925
He was not one of those referred to in Mathews v. C. & N. W. R. Co. 162 Minn. 313 , , whose own neglect of duty is so far within the realm of reasonable possibility as an agency of causation that the res ipsa loquitur doctrine cannot be invoked.