Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 203 N.W. 514.

34 citing documents.

City of St. Cloud, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Agency, (citing Oakman v. City of Eveleth , (stating that a quasi-judicial decision requires the performance of a discretionary act, which depends on the ascertainment, consideration, and determination of evidentiary facts)); see also Staeheli v. City of St.
Tyler Vasseur v. City of Minneapolis, Ginny Gelms, in her official capacity as Elections Manager, Hennepin County 887 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 2016
Tyler Vasseur v. City of Minneapolis, Ginny Gelms, in her official capacity as Elections Manager, Hennepin County 887 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 2016
See, e.g., Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 163 Minn. 100, 106, 203 N.W.
Respect the Promise in Opposition to R-14-02-Neighbors for a Better Glendale v. Hanna 360 P.3d 92 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
The Centennial Fire Fighters Relief Association v. The City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County Auditor, Jonell Sawyer in … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The Centennial Fire Fighters Relief Association v. The City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County Auditor, Jonell Sawyer in … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Hanson, d at 488; see also Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 163 Minn. 100, 107, 203 N.W.
Motokazie! Inc. v. Rice County 824 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Motokazie! Inc. v. Rice County 824 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Thus, we conclude that “[a]n ordinance is a local law.” Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 163 Minn. 100, 106 , 203 N.W.
Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority 675 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority 675 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-40 (Minn.1992) (termination of a public employee is a quasi-judicial act); see also Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 163 Minn. 100, 108-09 , 203 N.W.
Cole v. Star Tribune 581 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Cole v. Star Tribune 581 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
We conclude that the board of pardons is a quasi-judicial entity because it applies “deliberate human judgment based upon evidentiary facts of some sort commanding the exercise of ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ discretionary power.” Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 163 Minn. 100, 108-09 , 203 N.W.
Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit Operations 563 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit Operations 563 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
City of Shorewood v. Metropolitan Waste Control Comm’n, (quoting Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 163 Minn. 100, 108-09 , 203 N.W.
Press v. City of Minneapolis 553 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Press v. City of Minneapolis 553 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 163 Minn. 100, 108-09 , 203 N.W.
Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 551 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 551 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
See Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 163 Minn. 100, 108-09 , 203 N.W.
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 550 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1996
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 550 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1996
E.g., Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 163 Minn. 100, 109 , 203 N.W.
City of Shorewood v. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission 533 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1995
City of Shorewood v. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission 533 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1995
Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 163 Minn. 100, 108-09 , 203 N.W.
Hanson v. City of Granite Falls 529 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Hanson v. City of Granite Falls 529 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 163 Minn. 100 , 203 N.W.
Micius v. St. Paul City Council 524 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Micius v. St. Paul City Council 524 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
It is the performance of an administrative act which depends upon and requires the existence, or non-existence of certain facts which must be ascertained and the investigation and determination of such facts cause the administrative act to be termed quasi judicial.” Neitzel, d at 75 (quoting Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 163 Minn. 100, 108-09 , 203 N.W.
Neitzel v. County of Redwood 521 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Neitzel v. County of Redwood 521 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 163 Minn. 100, 108-09 , 203 N.W.
City of Mahtomedi v. Spychalla 243 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1976
City of Mahtomedi v. Spychalla 243 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1976
See, Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 163 Minn. 100
Anderson v. City of Two Harbors 70 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1955
Anderson v. City of Two Harbors 70 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1955
This court held in Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 163 Minn. 100 , , that the voters of a municipality cannot, by initiative procedure under a home rule charter, adopt an ordinance which compels the city council to accept a specified sum for the settlement of a lawsuit.
Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board & Hotel & Restaurant Employees' Local No. 556 35 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1948
Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board & Hotel & Restaurant Employees' Local No. 556 35 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1948
See, also, Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 163 Minn. 100 , 203 N.W.