Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McGuigan v. Allen, 206 N.W. 714.

32 citing documents.

City of St. Paul v. Sorenson 167 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1969
City of St. Paul v. Sorenson 167 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1969
10 See, also, McGuigan v. Allen, 165 Minn. 390 , .
Orth v. Shiely Petter Crushed Stone Co. 91 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1958
Orth v. Shiely Petter Crushed Stone Co. 91 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1958
merely declaratory of the common law rule of subrogation, available to the employer without act of the legislature.” Subsequently, in City of Red Wing v. Eichinger, 163 Minn. 54, 57 , , again in dictum, it was stated that “Such right of subrogation as the law gave the city [the employer], it, by contract, assumed to pass to the insurance company.” Finally, in McGuigan v. Allen, 165 Minn. 390, 394 , , this court’s doubts upon the question were disclosed when it was stated that “For the purpose of
Dockendorf v. Lakie 86 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1957
Dockendorf v. Lakie 86 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1957
1 See, Dockendorf v. Lakie, 240 Minn. 441 , 61 N. W. (2d) 752 ; Nyquist v. Batcher, 235 Minn. 491 , 51 N. W. (2d) 566 ; Gleason v. Geary, 214 Minn. 499 , 8 N. W. (2d) 808 ; Joel v. Peter Dale Garage, 206 Minn. 580 , ; McGuigan v. Allen, 165 Minn. 390 , ; Patterson v. O’Neil, 151 Minn. 15 , ; Kelley v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. 142 Minn. 44 , ; Hirsch v. Bayne, 112 Minn. 68 , ; Pierce v. Wagner, 29 Minn. 355 , .
Nyquist v. Batcher 51 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 1952
Nyquist v. Batcher 51 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 1952
McGuigan v. Allen, 165 Minn. 390 , ; Robinson v. Butler, 226 Minn. 491 , 33 N. W. (2d) 821 , 4 A. L. R. (2d) 143.
Anderson v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co. 231 Minn. 469 Minn. 1950
Anderson v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co. 231 Minn. 469 Minn. 1950
McGuigan v. Allen, 165 Minn. 390 , ; Blair v. Espeland, 231 Minn. 444 , 43 N. W. (2d) 274 .
Blair v. Espeland 43 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1950
Blair v. Espeland 43 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1950
In McGuigan v. Allen, 165 Minn. 390, 395 , , the purpose of this requirement is stated thus: •“* * * The purpose of the statute, * * * is to save a defendant against whom a judgment may be obtained from further vexation at the hands of other claimants of the same demand.
Robinson v. Butler 33 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1948
Robinson v. Butler 33 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1948
County of Morrison v. Babcock, 161 Minn. 80 , ; McGuigan v. Allen, 165 Minn. 390 , ; Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp. 177 Minn. 579 , .
Zion Evangelical Lutheran Church of Detroit Lakes v. City of Detroit Lakes 21 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1945
Zion Evangelical Lutheran Church of Detroit Lakes v. City of Detroit Lakes 21 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1945
McGuigan v. Allen, 165 Minn. 390 , 395 , 206 N.W.
Joel v. Peter Dale Garage 289 N.W. 524 Minn. 1940
Joel v. Peter Dale Garage 289 N.W. 524 Minn. 1940
* * * The intention to preserve and continue existing remedies is clear.” See also McGuigan v. Allen, 165 Minn. 390 , .
Peterson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 279 N.W. 588 Minn. 1938
Peterson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 279 N.W. 588 Minn. 1938
The evidence in regard to workmen’s compensation was properly excluded under our decision in McGuigan v. Allen, 165 Minn. 390 , , and Guile v. Greenberg, 192 Minn. 548 , .
Farmers National Bank v. Brown 269 N.W. 409 Minn. 1936
Farmers National Bank v. Brown 269 N.W. 409 Minn. 1936
See McGuigan v. Allen, 165 Minn. 390 , .
Guile v. Greenberg 257 N.W. 649 Minn. 1934
Guile v. Greenberg 257 N.W. 649 Minn. 1934
McGuigan v. Allen, 165 Minn. 390 , .
Flor v. Buck 248 N.W. 743 Minn. 1933
Flor v. Buck 248 N.W. 743 Minn. 1933
The rights as between the insured and the insurer, questions with which the wrongdoer has little to say other than to know that the plaintiff is the real party 'in interest (McGuigan v. Allen, 165 Minn. 390 , ), are usually determined by the provisions of the policy.
Blatterman v. Cities Service Oil Co. 246 N.W. 532 Minn. 1933
Blatterman v. Cities Service Oil Co. 246 N.W. 532 Minn. 1933
As stated in the case of McGuigan v. Allen, 165 Minn. 390, 395 , , the purpose of § 9165 “is to save a defendant against whom a judgment may be obtained from further vexation at the hands of other claimants on the same demand.
Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp. 225 N.W. 911 Minn. 1929
Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp. 225 N.W. 911 Minn. 1929
Lovell v. Marshall, 162 Minn. 18 , ; McGuigan v. Allen, 165 Minn. 390 , ; Dennis v. Nelson, 55 Minn. 144 , ; State v. Lambert, 171 Minn. 369 , ; Griggs v. City of St.
Peterson v. Swanson 223 N.W. 287 Minn. 1929
Peterson v. Swanson 223 N.W. 287 Minn. 1929
Paul Title I. & T. Co. v. Thomas, 60 Minn. 140 , ; Anderson v. Reardon, 46 Minn. 185 , ; Triggs v. Jones, 46 Minn. 277 , ; McGuigan v. Allen, 165 Minn. 390 , , and cases cited.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by