Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Fossen v. Hitman, 205 N.W. 267.

33 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Kristina Marie Russell, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-68 (Minn. 1925) (aunt and uncle).
In Re the Welfare of M.G. 407 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of M.G. 407 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Fossen v. Hitman, 164 Minn. 373, 375 , 205 N.W.
In Re the Welfare of W.R. 379 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of W.R. 379 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Fossen v. Hitman, 164 Minn. 373, 375 , 205 N.W.
In Re Dependency of Klugman 97 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1959
In Re Dependency of Klugman 97 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1959
Fossen v. Hitman, 164 Minn. 373 , 205 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Whaley 75 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1956
State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Whaley 75 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1956
Fossen v. Hitman, 164 Minn. 373, 375 , , this court speaking through Mr. Justice Holt observed that the natural parent has first right to the care and custody of the child “unless the best interests of the child require it to be given into the hands of some one else.” It was pointed out that the term “best interests” did not mean an ea
Molto v. Molto 64 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 1954
Molto v. Molto 64 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 1954
Fossen v. Hitman, 164 Minn. 373 , 205 N.W.
State ex rel. Schroeder v. Boehland 53 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1952
State ex rel. Schroeder v. Boehland 53 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1952
Fossen v. Hitman, 164 Minn. 373, 375 , , this court, speaking through Mr. Justice Holt, said: “The law is well settled in this state that the natural parents have the first right to the care and custody of the child, unless the best interests of the child require it to be given into the hands of some one else.
State ex rel. Ausdemore v. Catholic Welfare Ass'n 48 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1951
State ex rel. Ausdemore v. Catholic Welfare Ass'n 48 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1951
Fossen v. Hitman, 164 Minn. 373 , State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Rys v. Vorlicek 40 N.W.2d 350 Minn. 1949
State Ex Rel. Rys v. Vorlicek 40 N.W.2d 350 Minn. 1949
Fossen v. Hitman, 164 Minn. 373 , ; State ex rel.
Kienlen v. Kienlen 34 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 1948
Kienlen v. Kienlen 34 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 1948
Fossen v. Hitman, 164 Minn. 373 , .
State Ex Rel. Merritt v. Eldred 29 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1947
State Ex Rel. Merritt v. Eldred 29 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1947
Fossen v. Hitman, 164 Minn. 373, 375 , , this court, speaking through Mr. Justice Holt, said: “The law is well settled in this state that the natural parents have the first right to the care and custody of the child, unless the best interests of the child require it to be given into the hands of some one else.
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Sanders 10 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1943
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Sanders 10 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1943
Fossen v. Hitman, 164 Minn. 373 , .
State Ex Rel. Olson v. Sorenson 293 N.W. 241 Minn. 1940
State Ex Rel. Olson v. Sorenson 293 N.W. 241 Minn. 1940
Fossen v. Hitman, 164 Minn. 373 , ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Vik v. Sivertson 260 N.W. 522 Minn. 1935
State Ex Rel. Vik v. Sivertson 260 N.W. 522 Minn. 1935
Fossen v. Hitman, 164 Minn. 373 , ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Herniman v. Markson 244 N.W. 687 Minn. 1932
State Ex Rel. Herniman v. Markson 244 N.W. 687 Minn. 1932
Fossen v. Hitman, 164 Minn. 373 , ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Feeley v. Williams 222 N.W. 927 Minn. 1929
State Ex Rel. Feeley v. Williams 222 N.W. 927 Minn. 1929
Fossen v. Hitman, 164 Minn. 373 , .
State Ex Rel. Henning v. Gundvaldson 211 N.W. 310 Minn. 1926
State Ex Rel. Henning v. Gundvaldson 211 N.W. 310 Minn. 1926
Fossen v. Hitman, 164 Minn. 373 , ; State ex rel.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by