Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Eichholz v. Shaft, 208 N.W. 18.

30 citing documents.

Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 705 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 2005
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 705 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 2005
(citing Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339, 342 , 208 N.W.
In Re Termination of Gay 555 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re Termination of Gay 555 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
See Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339, 345 , 208 N.W.
State v. Bachmann 521 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Bachmann 521 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339, 343-44 , 208 N.W.
Arens v. Hanecy 269 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1978
Arens v. Hanecy 269 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1978
Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339, 342 , 208 N.W.
Amundsen v. Poppe 34 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1948
Amundsen v. Poppe 34 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1948
In Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339, 343 , , this court said: “The upkeep and care of a home for one’s self and family are not in the category of a trade, business, profession or occupation, as generally understood.
Fisher v. Manzke 294 N.W. 477 Minn. 1940
Fisher v. Manzke 294 N.W. 477 Minn. 1940
They cite and rely on Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339 , ; Sink v. Pharaoh, 170 Minn. 137 , , 50 A. L. R. 1173; Billmayer v. Sanford, 177 Minn. 465 , ; Jackson v. Cathcart & Maxfield, Inc. 201 Minn. 526 , ; and Chisholm v. Davis, 207 Minn. 614 , .
Haimila v. the Opsahl Co. 293 N.W. 599 Minn. 1940
Haimila v. the Opsahl Co. 293 N.W. 599 Minn. 1940
1927, § 9769 (G. S. 1913, § 8313), was that the time within which the writ of certiorari may be issued does not begin to run until written notice of the order or other proceeding to be reviewed has been served upon the party adversely affected, or his attorney, *606 and that “actual notice does not take the place of such written notice.” Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339 , , was a workman’s compensation case in which it was considered that the conduct of the respondents, after informal service of
State v. Cooper 285 N.W. 903 Minn. 1939
State v. Cooper 285 N.W. 903 Minn. 1939
As pointed out in Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339 , 208 N.W.
Rosenfield v. Matthews 275 N.W. 698 Minn. 1937
Rosenfield v. Matthews 275 N.W. 698 Minn. 1937
It was to saddle the industries with the loss that resulted to the employes therein from accidental injuries received in the work.” Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339, 342 , .
Anderson v. Ueland 267 N.W. 517 Minn. 1936
Anderson v. Ueland 267 N.W. 517 Minn. 1936
The case of Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339 , 208 N.W.
Fingerson v. Alpha Tau Chapter of Zeta Tau Alpha Sorority 267 N.W. 212 Minn. 1936
Fingerson v. Alpha Tau Chapter of Zeta Tau Alpha Sorority 267 N.W. 212 Minn. 1936
But see Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339 , , and Keefover v. Vasey, 112 Neb.
Hagelstad v. Usiak 252 N.W. 430 Minn. 1934
Hagelstad v. Usiak 252 N.W. 430 Minn. 1934
Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339 , 208 N.W.
Houser v. Osman Temple Ancient Arabic Order Nobles of Mystic Shrine 248 N.W. 827 Minn. 1933
Houser v. Osman Temple Ancient Arabic Order Nobles of Mystic Shrine 248 N.W. 827 Minn. 1933
Foss v. Nelson, 145 Minn. 123 , ; Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339 , ; Sink v. Pharaoh, 170 Minn. 137 , , 50 A. L. R. 1173; Billmayer v. Sanford, 177 Minn. 465 , ; Ostlie v. H. F. Dirks & Son, 189 Minn. 34 , .
Billmayer v. Sanford 225 N.W. 426 Minn. 1929
Billmayer v. Sanford 225 N.W. 426 Minn. 1929
473 , 102 A. 127 , L. R. A. 1918F, 213; Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339 , .
Perkovich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 214 N.W. 795 Minn. 1927
Perkovich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 214 N.W. 795 Minn. 1927
Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339 , .