Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite County of Steele v. County of Waseca, 207 N.W. 323.
-
County of Goodhue v. Rice County
160 N.W.2d 657
Minn. 1968
.03 now provides: “When any such poor person has none of the relatives named in section 261.01, or they are not of sufficient ability, or refuse or fail, to support him, he shall receive such support or relief as *127 the case may require from the county, town, city, or village in which he has a settlement at the time of applying therefor, as hereinafter provided, * * *.” See, also, In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , ; Town of Smiley v. Village of St.
-
In Re Application of County of Beltrami to Determine Settlement of Joyce
119 N.W.2d 25
Minn. 1963
Hilaire, 183 Minn. 533 , ; In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , .
-
City of Minneapolis v. Village of Hanover
297 N.W. 27
Minn. 1941
These intervening residences eliminated from computation, cf. In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , ; In re Settlement of Spangler, 386 Minn. 509 , , Greenwood is left as the place wherein there had been the longest period of residence during the determinative year.
-
In Re Settlement of Schendel
297 N.W. 27
Minn. 1941
In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , 207 N.W.
-
County of Stearns v. Township of Fair Haven
279 N.W. 707
Minn. 1938
In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , .
-
County of Mille Lacs v. Town of Leigh
278 N.W. 581
Minn. 1938
Timo v. Juvenile Court, 188 Minn. 125 , ; In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , .
-
In Re Settlement of Venteicher
278 N.W. 581
Minn. 1938
544 ; In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , 207 N.W.
-
City of Detroit Lakes v. Village of Litchfield
274 N.W. 236
Minn. 1937
Plaintiff relies on In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , ; City of Willmar v. County of Kandiyohi, 167 Minn. 178 , ; In re Settlement of Spangler, 186 Minn. 509 , .
- In Re Settlement of Johnson 248 N.W. 710 Minn. 1933
- County of Kanabec v. County of Pine 248 N.W. 710 Minn. 1933
-
In Re Settlement of Johnson
248 N.W. 710
Minn. 1933
875 ; County of Steele v. County of Waseca, 166 Minn. 180 , 207 N.W.
-
County of Kanabec v. County of Pine
248 N.W. 710
Minn. 1933
Hilaire, 183 Minn. 533 , ; Village of Grove City v. Township of Manannah, 182 Minn. 197 , ; County of Steele v. County of Waseca, 166 Minn. 180 , .
-
State Ex Rel. Timo v. Juvenile Court
246 N.W. 544
Minn. 1933
It was assumed below that inasmuch as the family, in April, 1931, had its “settlement” for purposes of poor relief in Crow Wing county, and thereafter received aid therefrom, and so could not have acquired another “settlement” anywhere in the state during that year (G. S. 1923 [ 1 Mason, 1927 ] § 3161); In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , ) that it did not acquire residence in Wadena county, either when the Timos removed there or at any other time.
- In Re Settlement of Spangler 243 N.W. 695 Minn. 1932
- Petersburg v. City of Jackson 243 N.W. 695 Minn. 1932
-
Petersburg v. City of Jackson
243 N.W. 695
Minn. 1932
County of Steele v. County of Waseca, 166 Minn. 180 , 207 ZEST.
-
In Re Settlement of Spangler
243 N.W. 695
Minn. 1932
County of Steele v. County of Waseca, 166 Minn. 180 , 207 N.W.
-
Village of Moose Lake v. County of St. Louis
243 N.W. 384
Minn. 1932
It is provided by statute (§ 3161) that in determining place of settlement the time during which a person “has received relief from the poor fund of any county or municipality shall be excluded in determining the time of residence hereunder.” In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , .
-
In Re Settlement Skog
243 N.W. 384
Minn. 1932
In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , 207 N.W.
-
Town of Smiley v. Village of St. Hilaire
237 N.W. 416
Minn. 1931
In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , .
- Village of Grove City v. Township of Manannah 233 N.W. 875 Minn. 1930
-
Village of Grove City v. Township of Manannah
233 N.W. 875
Minn. 1930
County of Douglas v. Township of Dead Lake, 179 Minn. 251 , ; County of Steele v. County of Waseca, 166 Minn. 180 , ; City of Willmar v. County of Kandiyohi, 167 Minn. 178 , .
- City of Willmar v. County of Kandiyohi 208 N.W. 648 Minn. 1926
-
City of Willmar v. County of Kandiyohi
208 N.W. 648
Minn. 1926
County of Steele v. County of Waseca, 166 Minn. 180 , .
- In Re Leslie 207 N.W. 323 Minn. 1926