Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co., 208 N.W. 421.

56 citing documents.

Debold v. H. P. Martell & Sons 183 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1971
Debold v. H. P. Martell & Sons 183 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1971
No. 102, 251 Minn. 297 , 87 N. W. (2d) 646 ; Tretter v. Dart Transit Co. 271 Minn. 131 , 135 N. W. *116 (2d) 484; Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 ; Mount v. City of Redwood Falls, 260 Minn. 16 , 108 N. W. (2d) 443 ; Geerdes v. J. R. Watkins Co. 258 Minn. 254 , 103 N. W. (2d) 641 ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 266 Minn. 420 , 123 N. W. (2d) 695 .
Greenlee v. Drees 144 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1966
Greenlee v. Drees 144 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1966
It may be said that the finding of the trial court is supported by Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , , and Norris v. Kaempfer, 274 App. Div. 857 , 81 N. Y. S. (2d) 808, cases dealing with similar fact situations where workmen employed under a loose arrangement subject to the employer’s right of control and right to discharge at any time were held not to be independent contractors.
Christopherson v. Security State Bank of Oklee 97 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1959
Christopherson v. Security State Bank of Oklee 97 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1959
Co. 186 Minn. 534 , ; Fuller v. Northern States Power Co. 189 Minn. 134 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Rick v. Noble, 196 Minn. 185 , ; Larson v. Le Mere, 220 Minn. 25 , 18 N. W. (2d) 696 ; contra, Lemkuhl v. Clark, 209 Minn. 276 , .
Kolbeck v. Myhra 96 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1959
Kolbeck v. Myhra 96 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1959
6 Colosimo v. Giacomo, 199 Minn. 600 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Workman v. Endriss, 164 Minn. 199 , .
Moorhead v. Grassle 93 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1958
Moorhead v. Grassle 93 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1958
Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; 12 Minn. L. Rev. 83 .” It is apparent from the record that Grassle had the unquestioned right to control the means and manner of wrecking the buildings.
Altermatt v. Altermatt 58 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1953
Altermatt v. Altermatt 58 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1953
Colosimo v. Giacomo, 199 Minn. 600 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Workman v. Endriss, 164 Minn. 199 , .
Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 49 N.W.2d 797 Minn. 1951
Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 49 N.W.2d 797 Minn. 1951
Lemkuhl v. Clark, 209 Minn. 276 , ; Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; 12 Minn. L. Rev. 83 .
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
635 ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , 208 N.W.
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
Virginia & R. L. Co. v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , ; Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Ledoux v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Angell v. White Eagle O. & R. Co. 169 Minn. 183 , ; Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , ; Krause v. Bodin, 172 Minn. 467 , ; Schonberg v. Zinsmaster Baking Co. 173 Minn. 414 , ; Nesseth v. Skelly Oil Co. 176 Minn. 373
Judd v. Sanatorium Commission of Hennepin County 35 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1948
Judd v. Sanatorium Commission of Hennepin County 35 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1948
See, also, Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Ledoux v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Angell v. White Eagle O. & R. Co. 169 Minn. 183 , ; Lynch v. Hutchinson Produce Co. 169 Minn. 329 , ; Rouse v. Town of Bird Island, 169 Minn. 367 , ; Morss v. Murphy T. & S. Co. 170 Minn. 1 , ; Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15
Larson v. Le Mere 18 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1945
Larson v. Le Mere 18 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1945
Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
Bergstrom v. Brehmer 8 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1943
Bergstrom v. Brehmer 8 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1943
Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; 12 Minn. L. Bev.
Rice v. Keystone View Co. 297 N.W. 841 Minn. 1941
Rice v. Keystone View Co. 297 N.W. 841 Minn. 1941
Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; 12 Minn. L. Rev. 83 .
Bolin v. Scheurer 297 N.W. 106 Minn. 1941
Bolin v. Scheurer 297 N.W. 106 Minn. 1941
Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , .
Lemkuhl v. Clark 296 N.W. 28 Minn. 1941
Lemkuhl v. Clark 296 N.W. 28 Minn. 1941
Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; 12 Minn. L. Rev. 83 .
Colosimo v. Giacomo 273 N.W. 632 Minn. 1937
Colosimo v. Giacomo 273 N.W. 632 Minn. 1937
And in Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , , we held that a corporation organized for the purpose of acquiring, holding, renting, and using certain buildings, and engaged in repairing a building to make it ready for a tenant, was acting in the usual course of its business, and that an employe injured while making such repairs was entitled to co
Fuller v. Northern States Power Co. 248 N.W. 756 Minn. 1933
Fuller v. Northern States Power Co. 248 N.W. 756 Minn. 1933
And see also in that connection Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , , and our previous decisions on that subject therein cited.
Wilson v. Thos. Kileen & Son 246 N.W. 542 Minn. 1933
Wilson v. Thos. Kileen & Son 246 N.W. 542 Minn. 1933
Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Wass v. Bracker Constr.
Cardinal v. Prudential Insurance Co. of North America 243 N.W. 706 Minn. 1932
Cardinal v. Prudential Insurance Co. of North America 243 N.W. 706 Minn. 1932
In Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , , the workman who was injured in painting the roof of a factory building was doing all the work himself and using his own brushes.
Wass v. Bracker Construction Co. 240 N.W. 464 Minn. 1931
Wass v. Bracker Construction Co. 240 N.W. 464 Minn. 1931
Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; 6 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Billmayer v. Sanford 225 N.W. 426 Minn. 1929
Billmayer v. Sanford 225 N.W. 426 Minn. 1929
Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , .
Nesseth v. Skelly Oil Co. 223 N.W. 608 Minn. 1929
Nesseth v. Skelly Oil Co. 223 N.W. 608 Minn. 1929
Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Ledoux v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498 , ; Bosel v. *375 Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Angell v. White Eagle O. & R. Co. 169 Minn. 183 , ; Lynch v. Hutchinson Produce Co. 169 Minn. 329 , ; Rouse v. Town of Bird Island, 169 Minn. 367 , ; Morss v. Murphy T. & S. Co. 170 Minn. 1 , ; Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15
Ramczik v. Winona MacHine & Foundry Co. 218 N.W. 545 Minn. 1928
Ramczik v. Winona MacHine & Foundry Co. 218 N.W. 545 Minn. 1928
1917D, 866; Klein v. McCleary, 154 Minn. 498 , ; Benoy v. Torkelson, 161 Minn. 223 , ; Workman v. Endriss, 164 Minn. 199 , ; O’Rourke v. Percy Vittum Co. 166 Minn. 251 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , .
Krause v. Bodin 215 N.W. 838 Minn. 1927
Krause v. Bodin 215 N.W. 838 Minn. 1927
The case is ruled by Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Lynch v. Hutchinson Produce Co. 169 Minn. 329 , , and the other cases involving the same issuei reviewed in Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , , where-the decision against compensation was put upon the absence not only of actual supervision but also the right to c
Moore v. Kileen & Gillis 213 N.W. 49 Minn. 1927
Moore v. Kileen & Gillis 213 N.W. 49 Minn. 1927
In Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , , the right of control was emphasized as the thing which made for a contract of employment, while in Ledoux v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498 , , its absence led to a decision of independent contract.