Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Summers v. Midland Co., 209 N.W. 323.

30 citing documents.

Estate of Lawrence A. Werner by Vivian Eileen Werner, Personal Representative v. Kreg A. Werner, and third party … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Estate of Lawrence A. Werner by Vivian Eileen Werner, Personal Representative v. Kreg A. Werner, and third party … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Summers v. Midland Co., 167 Minn. 453, 455, 209 N.W.
S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. v. Mensing 759 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. v. Mensing 759 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
at 698 (quoting Summers v. Midland Co., 167 Minn. 453, 455 , 209 N.W.
Nelson v. Nelson 415 N.W.2d 694 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nelson v. Nelson 415 N.W.2d 694 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The status of the parties to a contract for deed was discussed in Summers v. Midland Co., 167 Minn. 453 , 209 N.W.
Matter of City of Shakopee 295 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 1980
Matter of City of Shakopee 295 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 1980
Cf. Hampel v. Gleason, 303 Minn. 55, 57 , (“ ‘The vendee takes the equitable title, subject to the exercise of the right of eminent domain, just as though the title had been conveyed to him.’ ”) (quoting Summers v. Midland Co., 167 Minn. 453, 456 , 209 N.W.
Hampel v. Gleason 225 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1975
Hampel v. Gleason 225 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1975
In Summers v. Midland Co. 167 Minn. 453 , , 46 A. L. R. 816 (1926), this court explicitly discussed the guidelines necessarily to be followed in determining this issue: “* * * The vendee takes the equitable title, subject to the exercise of the right of eminent domain, just as though the title has been conveyed to him.
State Ex Rel. Blee v. City of Rochester 109 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 1961
State Ex Rel. Blee v. City of Rochester 109 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 1961
2 Summers v. Midland Co. 167 Minn. 453 , , 46 A. L. R. 816; In re Petition of S. R. A. Inc. 213 Minn. 487 , 7 N. W. (2d) 484 ; In re Petition of S. R. A. Inc. 219 Minn. 493 , 18 N. W. (2d) 442 , affirmed, 327 U. S. 558 , 66 S. Ct. 749 , 90 L. ed. 851.
Independent-Consolidated School District No. 27 v. Waldron 63 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1954
Burger v. City of St. Paul 64 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1954
Independent-Consolidated School District No. 27 v. Waldron 63 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1954
ners v. Henry, 38 Minn. 266, 268 , , the court stated: “* * * If the purpose be public, the legislature is to judge of the necessity or propriety of appropriating the land, and, in the exercise of the power of eminent domain, simply obliges the owner to sell, ‘and the public is to be considered as an individual treating with an individual for an exchange.’ ” In Summers v. Midland Co. 167 Minn. 453, 456 , , 46 A. L. R. 816, the court referred to condemnation as a “forced sale,” and in Independent
Burger v. City of St. Paul 64 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1954
In Summers v. Midland Co. 167 Minn. 453 , , 46 A. L. R. 816, plaintiff and defendant executed an ordinary contract for deed involving real estate in the city of Duluth.
Building Industries, Inc. v. Wright Products, Inc. 62 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1953
Building Industries, Inc. v. Wright Products, Inc. 62 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1953
Drake v. Barton, 18 Minn. 414 (462); Summers v. Midland Co. 167 Minn. 453 , , 46 A. L. R. 816; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
Village of Minneota v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. 31 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1948
Village of Minneota v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. 31 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1948
No person is presumed to covenant against the act of sovereignty.” In Summers v. Midland Co. 167 Minn. 453 , , 46 A. L. R. 816, plaintiff attempted to rescind a contract for the sale of land and recover the amount paid.
In Re Petition of S. R. A., Inc. 7 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1942
In Re Petition of S. R. A., Inc. 7 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1942
For our purpose, the summation of our prior cases made by this court in Summers v. Midland Co. 167 Minn. 453, 455 , , 46 A. L. R. 816, is worthy of quotation here: “What is the status of the parties to such contract for deed?
State, by Burnquist v. Flach 6 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1942
State, by Burnquist v. Flach 6 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1942
So, in Summers v. Midland Co. 167 Minn. 453, 456, 457 , , 46 A. L. R. 816, the court speaks of taking under condemnation as a “forced sale.” There the question before the court was whether a vendee in possession under a contract for deed could rescind upon the theory that the vendor, because of condemnation proceedings brought after the contr
First & American National Bank v. Whiteside 292 N.W. 770 Minn. 1940
First & American National Bank v. Whiteside 292 N.W. 770 Minn. 1940
208 , 55 P. 791 ; Summers v. Midland Co. 167 Minn. 453 , , 46 A. L. R. 816.
State Dept. of Rural Credit v. County of Washington 292 N.W. 204 Minn. 1940
State Dept. of Rural Credit v. County of Washington 292 N.W. 204 Minn. 1940
Summers v. Midland Co. 167 Minn. 453, 455 , 209 N. W. *535 323, 46 A. L. R. 816.
Lawrenz v. Langford Electric Co. 288 N.W. 727 Minn. 1939
Lawrenz v. Langford Electric Co. 288 N.W. 727 Minn. 1939
Hueston v. Mississippi & R. R. Boom Co. 76 Minn. 251 , ; Summers v. Midland Co. 167 Minn. 453 , , 46 A. L. E. 816.