Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hjelle v. Veigel, 210 N.W. 891.
- Farmers State Bank v. Sig Ellingson & Co. 16 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1944
-
Farmers State Bank v. Sig Ellingson & Co.
16 N.W.2d 319
Minn. 1944
Hjelle v. Veigel, 169 Minn. 173 , .
- Walz v. State Bank of Greenwald 1 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1941
-
Walz v. State Bank of Greenwald
1 N.W.2d 375
Minn. 1941
Hjelle v. Veigel, 169 Minn. 173 , .
- Minneapolis Fire & Marine Insurance v. Bank of Dawson 257 N.W. 510 Minn. 1934
-
Minneapolis Fire & Marine Insurance v. Bank of Dawson
257 N.W. 510
Minn. 1934
Hjelle v. Veigel, 169 Minn. 173 , .
- City of Canby v. Bank of Canby 257 N.W. 520 Minn. 1934
-
City of Canby v. Bank of Canby
257 N.W. 520
Minn. 1934
In the Monticello case, 180 Minn. 418, 421 , et seq., , prior cases of this court, such as Hjelle v. Veigel, 169 Minn. 173 , , and cases from other jurisdictions are reviewed.
- Vining Co-Operative Creamery Ass'n v. Peyton 255 N.W. 252 Minn. 1934
-
Vining Co-Operative Creamery Ass'n v. Peyton
255 N.W. 252
Minn. 1934
Other cases in point are Hjelle v. Veigel, 169 Minn. 173 , ; Hogenson v. Farmers & Citizens State Bank, 180 Minn. 342 , .
- Paul v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank 245 N.W. 832 Minn. 1932
-
Paul v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank
245 N.W. 832
Minn. 1932
Hjelle v. Veigel, 169 Minn. 173 , *414 ; Milne v. Capital T. & S. Bank, 170 Minn. 66 , ; Standard Oil Co. v. Veigel, 174 Minn. 500 , ; American Exp.
- Ottawa Banking & Trust Co. v. Crookston State Bank Ex Rel. Veigel 239 N.W. 666 Minn. 1931
- Hurley v. Markville State Bank Ex Rel. Veigel 239 N.W. 769 Minn. 1931
-
Ottawa Banking & Trust Co. v. Crookston State Bank Ex Rel. Veigel
239 N.W. 666
Minn. 1931
See Hjelle v. Veigel, 169 Minn. 173 , ; Standard Oil Co. v. Veigel, 174 Minn. 500 , ; Blythe v. Kujawa, 175 Minn. 88 , , 60 A. L. R. 330; Winkler v. Veigel, 176 Minn. 384 , ; Emerson v. Citizens State Bank, 176 Minn. 584 , ; Campion v. Big Stone County Bank, 177 Minn. 51
-
Hurley v. Markville State Bank Ex Rel. Veigel
239 N.W. 769
Minn. 1931
Defendant contends that in spite of the agreement the law declares the deposit general and cites Hjelle v. Veigel, 169 Minn. 173 , ; Campion v. Big Stone County Bank, 177 Minn. 51 , ; Hogenson v. Farmers & C. State Bank, 180 Minn. 342 , ; Campion v. Village of Graceville, 181 Minn. 446 , .
- Lambrecht v. Midland National Bank & Trust Co. 234 N.W. 869 Minn. 1931
-
Lambrecht v. Midland National Bank & Trust Co.
234 N.W. 869
Minn. 1931
786 , 92 S. E. 625 , L. R. A. 1917F, 600; Eifel v. Veigel, 169 Minn. 281 , ; Hjelle v. Veigel, 169 Minn. 173 , ; Campion v. Village of Graceville, 181 Minn. 446 , .
- County of Lincoln v. Farmers State Bank 234 N.W. 449 Minn. 1931
-
County of Lincoln v. Farmers State Bank
234 N.W. 449
Minn. 1931
Milne v. Capital T. & S. Bank 170 Minn. 66 , ; Hjelle v. Veigel, 169 Minn. 173 , .
- Village of Monticello v. Citizens State Bank 230 N.W. 889 Minn. 1930
-
Village of Monticello v. Citizens State Bank
230 N.W. 889
Minn. 1930
Defendants cite from Hjelle v. Veigel, 169 Minn. 173 , , the statement: “A deposit in a bank is general unless there is an agreement that it shall be special, or be applied to a special purpose, or it is impressed with a trust.” We think here the money was accepted by the bank in the capacity of a trustee—there was no need of impressing a trust.
- Hogenson v. Farmers & Citizens State Bank 230 N.W. 817 Minn. 1930
-
Hogenson v. Farmers & Citizens State Bank
230 N.W. 817
Minn. 1930
See Hjelle v. Veigel, 169 Minn. 173 , ; Milne v. Capital T. & S. Bank, 170 Minn. 66 , .
- Campion v. Big Stone County Bank 224 N.W. 258 Minn. 1929
-
Campion v. Big Stone County Bank
224 N.W. 258
Minn. 1929
In Hjelle v. Veigel, 169 Minn. 173 , , is a good discussion and citation of cases.
- Winkler v. Veigel 223 N.W. 622 Minn. 1929
-
Winkler v. Veigel
223 N.W. 622
Minn. 1929
In Hjelle v. Veigel, 169 Minn. 173 , , the deposit was found to be general.
- Milne v. Capital Trust & Savings Bank 211 N.W. 954 Minn. 1927
-
Milne v. Capital Trust & Savings Bank
211 N.W. 954
Minn. 1927
State Bank, 169 Minn. 89 , ; Eifel v. Veigel, 169 Minn. 281 , ; and Hjelle v. Veigel, 169 Minn. 173 , .