Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co., 211 N.W. 580.

76 citing documents.

Weiler v. Ritchie 788 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 2010
Weiler v. Ritchie 788 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 2010
Co., 169 Minn. 342, 348 , 211 N.W.
State v. Chavarria-Cruz 784 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2010
Matter of Estate of Langlie 355 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Estate of Langlie 355 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co., 169 Minn. 342 , 211 N.W.
Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
Co., 169 Minn. 342 , 211 N.W.
Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc. 111 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 1961
Krueger v. Knutson 111 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1961
Krueger v. Knutson 111 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1961
Trimbo v. Minnesota Valley Natural Gas Co. 110 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1961
Trimbo v. Minnesota Valley Natural Gas Co. 110 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1961
Carpenter v. Nelson 101 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1960
Carpenter v. Nelson 101 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1960
Roeck v. Halvorson 95 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1959
Roeck v. Halvorson 95 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1959
Kedrowski v. Czech 69 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1955
Kedrowski v. Czech 69 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1955
Co. 169 Minn. 342 , ; Engstrom v. De Witt (8 Cir.) 58 F. (2d) 137; Nygren v. Minneapolis St.
Schmanski v. Church of St. Casimir of Wells 67 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 1954
Schmanski v. Church of St. Casimir of Wells 67 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 1954
Co. 169 Minn. 342 , , and Nygren v. Minneapolis St.
Jurgensen v. Schirmer Transportation Co. 64 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1954
Jurgensen v. Schirmer Transportation Co. 64 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1954
Co. 169 Minn. 342 , ; 7 Dunnell, Dig.
Nygren v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 63 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1954
Nygren v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 63 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1954
Co. 169 Minn. 342 , ; Engstrom v. De Witt (8 Cir.) 58 F. (2d) 137.
Pettit v. Lifson 57 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1953
Pettit v. Lifson 57 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1953
Olson v. Olson 55 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1952
Olson v. Olson 55 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1952
Co. 169 Minn. 342 , , the decedent was driving upon a viaduct when he struck a center pole and was fatally injured.
TePoel v. Larson 53 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1952
TePoel v. Larson 53 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1952
Co. 169 Minn. 342, 348 , , which was decided before the Ryan case, when it was considered proper to state the presumption to the jury, we said with respect to the burden of proof required to overcome it: “* * * its [the presumption] presence only takes the place of evidence that would accomplish the same purpose.
Rue v. Wendland 33 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1948
Rue v. Wendland 33 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1948
Duff v. Bemidji Motor Service Co. 299 N.W. 196 Minn. 1941
Duff v. Bemidji Motor Service Co. 299 N.W. 196 Minn. 1941
Co. 169 Minn. 342, 347 , .
Hack v. Johnson 275 N.W. 381 Minn. 1937
Hack v. Johnson 275 N.W. 381 Minn. 1937
Co. 169 Minn. 342 , 343 , 211 N.W.
Anderson v. Kelley 265 N.W. 821 Minn. 1936
Anderson v. Kelley 265 N.W. 821 Minn. 1936
Co. 169 Minn. 342 , 343 , 211 N.W.
Oxborough v. the Murphy Transfer Storage Co 260 N.W. 305 Minn. 1935
Oxborough v. the Murphy Transfer Storage Co 260 N.W. 305 Minn. 1935
Co. 169 Minn. 342, 347 , , wherein the court saM: *340 “One who loses his life in an accident is presumed to have exercised due care for his own safety.
Gross v. General Investment Co. 259 N.W. 557 Minn. 1935
Gross v. General Investment Co. 259 N.W. 557 Minn. 1935
Co. 169 Minn. 342 , ; Jasinuk v. Lombard, 189 Minn. 594 , , cited by defendants, which may be said to disapprove the instructions now assailed.
Guthrie v. Brown 256 N.W. 898 Minn. 1934
Guthrie v. Brown 256 N.W. 898 Minn. 1934
Co. 169 Minn. 342 , ; Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591 , ; Fitzgerald v. Village of Bovey, 174 Minn 450, ; Mechler v. McMahon, 180 Minn. 252 , ; Heikkinen v. Cashen, 183 Minn. 146 , ; Brown v. Raymond Bros. M. T. Inc. 186 Minn. 321 , .
Jasinuk v. Lombard 250 N.W. 568 Minn. 1933
Jasinuk v. Lombard 250 N.W. 568 Minn. 1933
Co. 169 Minn. 342, 343 , , where, because in effect it required a degree of proof beyond a fair preponderance, we held it was error to charge that the presumption against contributory negligence must yield to “clear proof” to the contrary.
Murphy v. Great Northern Railway Co. 248 N.W. 715 Minn. 1933
Murphy v. Great Northern Railway Co. 248 N.W. 715 Minn. 1933
Co. 169 Minn. 342 , , involved the construction and maintenance of trolley poles on a street passing over a railway viaduct in the city.
Brown v. Raymond Bros. Motor Transportation, Inc. 243 N.W. 112 Minn. 1932
Brown v. Raymond Bros. Motor Transportation, Inc. 243 N.W. 112 Minn. 1932
Co. 169 Minn. 342 , ; Jacobs v. Belland, 171 Minn. 838 , ; Forster v. Consumers W. S. Co. 174 Minn. 105 , ; Mechler v. *325 McMahon, 184 Minn. 476 , ; Olson v. Purity Baking Co. 185 Minn. 571 , .