Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Merrill v. St. Paul City Railway Co., 212 N.W. 533.

46 citing documents.

Soukup v. Summer 131 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1964
Soukup v. Summer 131 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1964
Co. 170 Minn. 332, 335 , , we held that it was not error for the trial court to refuse the following requested charge: “* * * [P]laintiff’s failure to call these physicians as witnesses permitted the jury ‘to indulge in the presumption that the testimony of the - attending physicians if introduced would not have been
Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel 104 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1960
Gross v. Hoag 87 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1958
Gross v. Hoag 87 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1958
Nelson v. Ackermann 83 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1957
Nelson v. Ackermann 83 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1957
Co. 170 Minn. 332, 335 , , we held that it was not error to refuse to instruct the jury that plaintiff’s failure to call certain doctors to whom plaintiff had first gone for an examination permitted the jury “to indulge in the presumption that the testimony of the attending physicians if introduced would not have bee
Zuber v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 74 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1956
Zuber v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 74 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1956
Cameron v. Evans 62 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1954
Cameron v. Evans 62 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1954
Co. 170 Minn. 332 , ; Quinn v. C. M. & St.
Norton v. Nelson 53 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1952
Bunge v. Yager 52 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1952
Bunge v. Yager 52 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1952
Co. 170 Minn. 332 , , plaintiff sued two defendants, alleging that the concurrent negligence of both resulted in his injury.
Ellerman v. Skelly Oil Co. 34 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1948
Ellerman v. Skelly Oil Co. 34 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1948
Co. 170 Minn. 332 , ; Schultz v. Swift & Co. 210 Minn. 533 , .
Larson v. Le Mere 18 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1945
Larson v. Le Mere 18 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1945
Co. 170 Minn. 332 , , which did not involve the dismissal of an appeal, is simply an action in negligence wherein the absolving of one defendant from liability did not necessarily fix liability as to the other and vice versa.
American Motorists Insurance Co. v. Vigen 5 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1942
American Motorists Insurance Co. v. Vigen 5 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1942
Co. 170 Minn. 332, 334 , , as conclusive on the question now before us. In that case there was a directed verdict in favor of one of two defendants and a jury verdict against the other, who on appeal sought to review the propriety of the directed verdict upon the theory that, if erroneous, it took from him his right to co
Olson v. Neubauer 300 N.W. 613 Minn. 1941
Olson v. Neubauer 300 N.W. 613 Minn. 1941
Co. 170 Minn. 332 , ; Hardware Mut.
Kemerer v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance 276 N.W. 228 Minn. 1937
Kemerer v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance 276 N.W. 228 Minn. 1937
Co. 170 Minn. 332 , ; Hardware Mut.
Kruchowski v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 254 N.W. 587 Minn. 1934
Kruchowski v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 254 N.W. 587 Minn. 1934
Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Anderson 253 N.W. 374 Minn. 1934
Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Anderson 253 N.W. 374 Minn. 1934
Zobel v. Boutelle 238 N.W. 49 Minn. 1931
Zobel v. Boutelle 238 N.W. 49 Minn. 1931
Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. v. McCarthy 236 N.W. 766 Minn. 1931
Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. v. McCarthy 236 N.W. 766 Minn. 1931
Lund v. Olson 234 N.W. 310 Minn. 1931
Lund v. Olson 234 N.W. 310 Minn. 1931
Co. 170 Minn. 332 , , and McDonough v. City of St.
Erickson v. Northland Transportation Co. 232 N.W. 715 Minn. 1930
Erickson v. Northland Transportation Co. 232 N.W. 715 Minn. 1930
McDonough v. City of St. Paul 330 N.W. 89 Minn. 1930
McDonough v. City of St. Paul 330 N.W. 89 Minn. 1930
Cox v. Chicago Great Western Railroad 223 N.W. 675 Minn. 1929
Cox v. Chicago Great Western Railroad 223 N.W. 675 Minn. 1929
Co. 170 Minn. 332 , 212 N.W.
Rimmer v. Cohen 215 N.W. 198 Minn. 1927
Rimmer v. Cohen 215 N.W. 198 Minn. 1927
Co. 170 Minn. 332 , ; Carter v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 170 Minn. 250 , ; Letnes v. Davis, 171 Minn. 399 , , and cases cited.
Arrell v. Davies 214 N.W. 287 Minn. 1927
Arrell v. Davies 214 N.W. 287 Minn. 1927
Co. 170 Minn. 332 , ; Letnes v. Davis, supra, page 399.
Letnes v. Davis 214 N.W. 761 Minn. 1927
Letnes v. Davis 214 N.W. 761 Minn. 1927
Co. 170 Minn. 332 , ; Carter v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 170 Minn. 250 , ; Unmacht v. Whitney, 146 Minn. 327 , ; Quinn v. C. M. & St.