Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Behr v. Soth, 212 N.W. 461.

35 citing documents.

Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 705 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 2005
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 705 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 2005
When the dissent asserts that a course and scope of employment test is an incorrect reading of personal duty, it relies significantly on *759 Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278 , 212 N.W.
Nelson v. Rodgers Hydraulic Inc. 351 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Nelson v. Rodgers Hydraulic Inc. 351 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278 , 212 N.W.
Dawley v. Thisius 231 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1975
Dawley v. Thisius 231 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1975
Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278 , 2 Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 72.10.
Jeune v. Industrial Commission 274 P.2d 85 Ariz. 1954
City of Phoenix v. Yates 208 P.2d 1147 Ariz. 1949
Hanson v. Hayes 29 N.W.2d 473 Minn. 1947
Hanson v. Hayes 29 N.W.2d 473 Minn. 1947
Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278 , .
Gleason v. Sing 297 N.W. 20 Minn. 1941
Gleason v. Sing 297 N.W. 20 Minn. 1941
1927, § 4291, and Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278 , .
Rosenfield v. Matthews 275 N.W. 698 Minn. 1937
Rosenfield v. Matthews 275 N.W. 698 Minn. 1937
To sustain defendant’s contention is to give an effect to that decision not intended ( 161 Minn. 243 ) “by wrenching from its context here and there a sentence or so of the very proper discussion of the questions involved.” Neither Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278 , , nor Thornton Bros. Co. v. Reese, 188 Minn. 5 , , is of material aid to defendant.
Smith v. Kedney Warehouse Co. Inc. 267 N.W. 478 Minn. 1936
Anderson v. Interstate Power Co. 263 N.W. 612 Minn. 1935
Distinguished Anderson v. Interstate Power Co. 263 N.W. 612 Minn. 1935
Defendant also cited in support of its contention Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278 , ; Uotila v. Oliver I. Min.
Hogle v. City of Minneapolis 258 N.W. 721 Minn. 1935
Hogle v. City of Minneapolis 258 N.W. 721 Minn. 1935
1917D, 563; Edberg v. Johnson, 149 Minn. 395 , ; Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278 , ; Ring v. Minneapolis St.
Egan v. E. A. Brown Co. 258 N.W. 161 Minn. 1935
Egan v. E. A. Brown Co. 258 N.W. 161 Minn. 1935
Co. 165 Minn. 475 , ; Rasmussen v. George Benz & Sons, 168 Minn. 319 , , ; Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278 , ; Olson v. Thiede, 177 Minn. 410 , ; McGrath v. N. W. Trust Co. 178 Minn. 47 , ; Ott v. St.
Grym v. City of Virginia 257 N.W. 661 Minn. 1934
Grym v. City of Virginia 257 N.W. 661 Minn. 1934
Against that it is of no effect that, as a matter of general definition, “ ‘firemen’ means those whose duty it is to extinguish fires and to protect property and life therefrom.” Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278, 280 , .
Henry v. D. A. Odell Motor Car Co. 253 N.W. 110 Minn. 1934
Henry v. D. A. Odell Motor Car Co. 253 N.W. 110 Minn. 1934
London & L. I. Co. v. District Court, 141 Minn. 348 , ; Hansen v. N. W. Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; Kaletha v. Hall Mercantile Co. 157 Minn. 290 , ; Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278 , ; Moore v. J. A. McNulty Co. 171 Minn. 75 , ; Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 172 Minn. 439 , .
Thornton Bros. Co. v. Reese 246 N.W. 527 Minn. 1933
Thornton Bros. Co. v. Reese 246 N.W. 527 Minn. 1933
In Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278 , , the defendant Avas chief of a city fire department and plaintiff the assistant chief.
Johnston v. W. S. Nott Co. 236 N.W. 466 Minn. 1931
Johnston v. W. S. Nott Co. 236 N.W. 466 Minn. 1931
And see Bookman v. Lyle C. & R. E. Co. 153 Minn. 479 , ; Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278 , ; Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , , and cases cited.
Ott v. St. Paul Union Stockyards 227 N.W. 47 Minn. 1929
Ott v. St. Paul Union Stockyards 227 N.W. 47 Minn. 1929
Co. 165 Minn. 475 , ; Rasmussen v. George Benz & Sons, 168 Minn. 319 , , ; Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278 , .
Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp. 225 N.W. 911 Minn. 1929
Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp. 225 N.W. 911 Minn. 1929
As an illustration of a common enterprise, see Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278 , 212 N. W. *583 461.
Olson v. Thiede 225 N.W. 391 Minn. 1929
Olson v. Thiede 225 N.W. 391 Minn. 1929
Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278 , ; Uotila v. Oliver I. Min.