Moore v. McDonald
Cited by
- Wilmington Trust, National Association, Gregg Williams v. 700 HENNEPIN HOLDINGS, LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Katherine Gayl, Paul R. Scarpari v. City of Rosemount, Friedges Excavating, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Obermoller v. Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul 409 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Ryman Ex Rel. Ryman v. Alt 266 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1978
- Matson v. Kivimaki 200 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1972
- In Re Township of Glendale, Scott County 180 N.W.2d 925 Minn. 1970
- Village of Savage v. Minnesota Municipal Commission 180 N.W.2d 925 Minn. 1970
- Clark v. Brings 169 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1969
- Anderson v. Anderson 107 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1961
- H & S COMPANY v. Minnesota State Board of Pharmacy 104 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1960
- Barnes v. MacKen 90 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1958
- Lavalle Ex Rel. Lavalle v. Kaupp 61 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1953
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Hansen v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co. 127 Minn. 522
- State ex rel. Klemer v. City Recorder 129 Minn. 535
- Anderson v. Village of Louisberg 121 Minn. 528
- State ex rel. Schwartzkopf v. City Council of Brainerd 141 N.W. 97
Opinion text
*485 PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs brought an action to enjoin defendant railway company from constructing a bridge on Williams street in the city of St. Paul for the purpose of carrying that street over its tracks, and to require defendant McDonald as commissioner of public works of the city to revoke the permit issued to the railroad company for the construction of the bridge. They applied to the district court for a temporary injunction restraining the railroad company from constructing the bridge or disturbing the street during the pendency of the action. This application was denied and they appealed from the order denying it. The bridge has now been constructed and completed, and the defendants move to dismiss the. appeal on the ground that it no longer presents a real controversy but has become a moot case. We think this position well taken. A reversal of the order, and the issuance at this time of the temporary injunction asked for would accomplish nothing. The appeal is dismissed. Hansen v. N. W. Tel. Exch. Co. 127 Minn. 522 , 149 N. W. 131 ; State v. City Recorder, 129 Minn. 535 , 152 N. W. 654 ; Anderson v. Village of Louisberg, 121 Minn. 528 , 141 N. W. 97 .