Cited by

: “When any such poor person has none of the relatives named in section 261.01, or they are not of sufficient ability, or refuse or fail, to support him, he shall receive such support or relief as *127 the case may require from the county, town, city, or village in which he has a settlement at the time of applying therefor, as hereinafter provided, * * *.” See, also, In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , ; Town of Smiley v. Village of St.

Hilaire, 183 Minn. 533 , ; In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , .

These intervening residences eliminated from computation, cf. In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , ; In re Settlement of Spangler, 386 Minn. 509 , , Greenwood is left as the place wherein there had been the longest period of residence during the determinative year.

In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , ; In re Settlement of Spangler, 186 Minn. 509 , 243 N.W.

In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , .

Timo v. Juvenile Court, 188 Minn. 125 , ; In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , .

544 ; In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , .

Plaintiff relies on In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , ; City of Willmar v. County of Kandiyohi, 167 Minn. 178 , ; In re Settlement of Spangler, 186 Minn. 509 , .

875 ; County of Steele v. County of Waseca, 166 Minn. 180 , .

Hilaire, 183 Minn. 533 , ; Village of Grove City v. Township of Manannah, 182 Minn. 197 , ; County of Steele v. County of Waseca, 166 Minn. 180 , .

It was assumed below that inasmuch as the family, in April, 1931, had its “settlement” for purposes of poor relief in Crow Wing county, and thereafter received aid therefrom, and so could not have acquired another “settlement” anywhere in the state during that year (G. S. 1923 [ 1 Mason, 1927 ] § 3161); In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , ) that it did not acquire residence in Wadena county, either when the Timos removed there or at any other time.

Under the holding of the Waseca case, 166 Minn. 180 , , they did not lose their settlement in Petersburg toAvnship by their absence in IoAva; and, upon returning to Petersburg, the time they Avere in IoAva Avas a part of their settlement in Petersburg.

County of Steele v. County of Waseca, 166 Minn. 180 , .

It is provided by statute (§ 3161) that in determining place of settlement the time during which a person “has received relief from the poor fund of any county or municipality shall be excluded in determining the time of residence hereunder.” In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , .

In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , .

In re Leslie, 166 Minn. 180 , .

County of Douglas v. Township of Dead Lake, 179 Minn. 251 , ; County of Steele v. County of Waseca, 166 Minn. 180 , ; City of Willmar v. County of Kandiyohi, 167 Minn. 178 , .

County of Steele v. County of Waseca, 166 Minn. 180 , .