Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Estate of Keeley v. Ochs, 208 N.W. 535.

30 citing documents.

Matter of Estate of Prigge 352 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Estate of Prigge 352 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See also In re Estate of Keeley, 167 Minn. 120, 121 , 208 N.W.
Blank v. Kramer 194 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 1972
In Re Estate of Reiland 194 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 1972
In Re Estate of Reiland 194 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 1972
We have unequivocally condemned this practice in In re Estate of Keeley, 167 Minn. 120 , 208 N.W.
Blank v. Kramer 194 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 1972
We have unequivocally condemned this practice in In re Estate of Keeley, 167 Minn. 120 , and more recently, in In re Estate of Peterson, 283 Minn. 446
Gustafson v. Kilgore 168 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1969
In Re Estate of Peterson 168 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1969
In Re Estate of Peterson 168 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1969
In addition, we held in In re Estate of Keeley, 167 Minn. 120, 124 , 208 N.W.
Gustafson v. Kilgore 168 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1969
In addition, we held in In re Estate of Keeley, 167 Minn. 120, 124 , , that— “* * * when a beneficiary of a substantial portion of the estate sustains a fiduciary or confidential relation with the testator and acts as the scriviner [sic] in drawing the will or controls its drafting, such facts alone will make a prima facie case and will sustain a finding of un
In Re Estate of Reay 249 Minn. 123 Minn. 1957
In Re Estate of Reay 249 Minn. 123 Minn. 1957
330 ; In re Estate of Keeley, 167 Minn. 120 , 208 N.W.
In Re Estate of Wilson 27 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1947
Teschendorf v. Strangeway 27 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1947
Teschendorf v. Strangeway 27 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1947
In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360 , ; In re Estate of Keeley, 167 Minn. 120 , .
In Re Estate of Wilson 27 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1947
677 ; In re Estate of Keeley, 167 Minn. 120 , 208 N.W.
In Re Estate of Stephens 293 N.W. 90 Minn. 1940
Cole v. Healy 293 N.W. 90 Minn. 1940
Cole v. Healy 293 N.W. 90 Minn. 1940
Amongst the many cases to which reference might be made the following are particularly helpful: Fischer v. Sperl, 94 Minn. 421 , ; In re Estate of Keeley, 167 Minn. 120 , ; and In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360 , .
In Re Estate of Stephens 293 N.W. 90 Minn. 1940
502 ; In re Estate of Keeley, 167 Minn. 120 , 208 N.W.
In Re Estate of Mazanec 283 N.W. 745 Minn. 1939
Mazanec v. Huna 283 N.W. 745 Minn. 1939
Mazanec v. Huna 283 N.W. 745 Minn. 1939
Mitchell v. Mitchell, supra, at p. 76 (N. W. p. 885); In re Estate of Jenks, supra, at p. 383 (N. W. p. 271); In re Estate of Keeley, 167 Minn. 120 , .
In Re Estate of Mazanec 283 N.W. 745 Minn. 1939
p. 271); In re Estate of Keeley, 167 Minn. 120 , 208 N.W.
In Re Estate of Mollan 232 N.W. 1 Minn. 1930
In Re Estate of Mollan 232 N.W. 1 Minn. 1930
This question was discussed at length in Keeley v. Ochs, 167 Minn. 120 , , and in In re Estate of Jernberg, 153 Minn. 458 , .
In Re Estate of Hallan 223 N.W. 771 Minn. 1929
In Re Estate of Hallan 223 N.W. 771 Minn. 1929
The case of Keeley v. Ochs, 167 Minn. 120 , , cited by contestant and in which the cases are reviewed, contains nothing to the contrary.
In Re Estate of Olson 223 N.W. 677 Minn. 1929
In Re Estate of Olson 223 N.W. 677 Minn. 1929
In re Estate of Jernberg, 153 Minn. 458 , ; In re Estate of Simmons, 156 Minn. 144 , ; In re Estate of Keeley, 167 Minn. 120 , ; In re Estate of Jenks, 164 Minn. 377 , .