Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schlecht v. Schlecht, 209 N.W. 883.

29 citing documents.

In Re Tveten 402 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1987
In Re Tveten 402 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1987
See Schlecht v. Schlecht, 168 Minn. 168, 172 , 209 N.W.
Komatz Construction, Inc. v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 186 N.W.2d 691 Minn. 1971
Komatz Construction, Inc. v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 186 N.W.2d 691 Minn. 1971
Schlecht v. Schlecht, 168 Minn. 168
Antonson v. Ekvall 186 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1971
Antonson v. Ekvall 186 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1971
Sehlecht v. Sehlecht, 168 Minn. 168 , .
Hay v. Duskin 455 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
O'BRIEN v. Johnson 148 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 1967
O'BRIEN v. Johnson 148 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 1967
4 Horton v. Kelly, 40 Minn. 193, 195 , ; Neumaier v. Vincent, 41 Minn. 481 , ; Thysell v. McDonald, 134 Minn. 400, 403 , ; Gale v. Hopkins, 165 Minn. 177 , 206 N. W. *309 164; Schlecht v. Schlecht, 168 Minn. 168, 176 , ; Strieker v. Trullinger, 172 Minn. 547 , ; Cysewski v. Steingraber, 222 Minn. 221 , 24 N. W. (2d) 266 ; First Nat.
Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Hvidsten 129 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1964
Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Hvidsten 129 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1964
1 Schlecht v. Schlecht, 168 Minn. 168 , ; Alton v. Hecht, 184 Minn. 271 , ; Johnson v. Mugg, 261 Minn. 451 , 113 N. W. (2d) 1 ; State, by Lord, v. Rust, 256 Minn. 246 , 98 N. W. (2d) 271 ; 2 Jones, Evidence (5 ed.) § 483; 7 Dunnell, Dig.
Fergon v. Cohen 128 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1964
Fergon v. Cohen 128 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1964
Co. 225 Minn. 508 , 31 N. W. (2d) 465 ; Schlecht v. Schlecht, 168 Minn. 168 , .
State v. Rust 98 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1959
State v. Rust 98 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1959
In Davis v. Moses, 172 Minn. 171, 175 , , this court said: “* * * Respondents not being parties to these instruments were at liberty to show what actually was agreed upon and what was done, even though the evidence so adduced by them did vary the terms of the instruments.” In Schlecht v. Schlecht, 168 Minn. 168 , , the court said that the rule prohibiting the admission of parol evidence to vary or contradict the terms of a written instrument cannot be invoked by *256 a stranger to the instrument
Northern National Bank v. Northern Minnesota National Bank 70 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1955
Northern National Bank v. Northern Minnesota National Bank 70 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1955
Schlecht v. Schlecht, 168 Minn. 168 , .
Dix v. Harris Machinery Co. 60 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1953
Dix v. Harris Machinery Co. 60 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1953
Co. v. McCarthy, 183 Minn. 414 , ; Schlecht v. Schlecht, 168 Minn. 168 , ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Kohrt v. Mercer 282 N.W. 129 Minn. 1938
Kohrt v. Mercer 282 N.W. 129 Minn. 1938
(Compare Schlecht v. Schlecht, 168 Minn. 168, 172 , .)
Steinke-Seidl Lumber Co. v. Newdall 237 N.W. 194 Minn. 1931
Steinke-Seidl Lumber Co. v. Newdall 237 N.W. 194 Minn. 1931
G. S. 1923 ( 2 Mason, 1927 ) § 8477; Schlecht v. Schlecht, 168 Minn. 168, 176 , .
Arvidson v. Slater 237 N.W. 12 Minn. 1931
Arvidson v. Slater 237 N.W. 12 Minn. 1931
Co. 156 Minn. 1 , , 38 A. L. R. 380; Schlecht v. Schlecht, 168 Minn. 168 , ; D. M. & N. Ry.
Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. v. McCarthy 236 N.W. 766 Minn. 1931
Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. v. McCarthy 236 N.W. 766 Minn. 1931
Schlecht v. Schlecht, 168 Minn. 168 , ; 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Nash v. Bengtson 228 N.W. 177 Minn. 1929
Nash v. Bengtson 228 N.W. 177 Minn. 1929
Schlecht v. Schlecht, 168 Minn. 168, 176 , .