Cited by

Co. 169 Minn. 342 , 211 N.W.

Co. 169 Minn. 342 , ; Saunders v. Yellow Cab Corp. 182 Minn. 62 , ; Heflin v. Swenson, 181 Minn. 277 , ; Schmitt v. Jackson, 174 Minn. 577 , ; Hollander v. Dietrich, 181 Minn. 376 , ; Shotts v. Standard Oil Co. 181 Minn. 386 , ; Peterson v. Miller, 182

Co. *84 169 Minn. 342 , .

Co. 169 Minn. 342 , ; Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591 , .

Co. 169 Minn. 342 , ; Coffman v. Kummer, 179 Minn. 120 , .

Co. 169 Minn. 342 , ; Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , .

Co. 169 Minn. 342 , , wherein there was a reversal be *102 cause of a charge that the presumption against negligence, as applied to contributory negligence, must yield “to clear proof.” The argument now is that to say that the presumption against suicide, plainly much stronger than that against negligence, cannot be overc

Co. 169 Minn. 342 , ; Duffy v. Stratton, supra; Ober v. The Golden Rule, supra; Conway v. Charles H. Wood & Co. supra.