Bowers v. Norton
Cited by
- Miller v. Snedeker 101 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1960
- Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell 94 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1959
- Madsen v. Powers 260 N.W. 510 Minn. 1935
- Zuelke v. Papke 241 N.W. 577 Minn. 1932
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Abbott v. Moldestad 74 Minn. 293
- Freeman v. Paulson 107 Minn. 64
- Noyes v. Brown 142 Minn. 211
- Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow 160 Minn. 414
- State Bank of Milan v. Sylte 162 Minn. 72
Opinion text
Per Curiam. Action by vendors against vendees for specific performance of a contract to convey land. After findings and an order for judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial. The case has proceeded and judgment has been ordered for plaintiffs under the rule of Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , 77 N. W. 227 , 73 Am. St. 348, and Freeman v. Paulson, 107 Minn. 64 , 119 N. W. 651 , 131 Am. St. 438. Those cases are now controlled by Noyes v. Brown, 142 Minn. 211 , 171 N. W. 803 . See also Paynesville L. Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414 , 200 N. W. 481 . The main argument for defendants is that the statute, G. S. 1923, Í; 9576, providing for the cancelation by notice of an executory contract for the conveyance of land, provides the exclusive remedy for the vendor. There is nothing in that point and it was decided otherwise in State Bank v. Sylte, 162 Minn. 72 , 202 N. W. 70 . The other points made for defendants are also disposed of adversely to defendants by the cases first above cited. Order affirmed.