Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 213 N.W. 49.

38 citing documents.

Blue & White Taxi v. Carlson 496 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Blue & White Taxi v. Carlson 496 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Rochester Dairy Co. v. Christgau, 217 Minn. 460, 465 , (quoting Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15, 19 , 213 N.W.
Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 123 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1963
Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 123 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1963
Appellant relies on Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , , which held that in a similar situation the relationship of independent contractor was created.
Hansen v. Adent 57 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1953
Distinguished Hansen v. Adent 57 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1953
Relator cites as controlling Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , .
Gartner v. Hogstad Fish Co. 43 N.W.2d 798 Minn. 1950
Gartner v. Hogstad Fish Co. 43 N.W.2d 798 Minn. 1950
See, Schoewe v. Winona Paint & Glass Co. 155 Minn. 4 , ; Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , ; Stucky v. Independent School Dist.
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
1004 ; Moore v. Kileen Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , 213 N.W.
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
Virginia & R. L. Co. v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , ; Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Ledoux v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Angell v. White Eagle O. & R. Co. 169 Minn. 183 , ; Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , ; Krause v. Bodin, 172 Minn. 467 , ; Schonberg v. Zinsmaster Baking Co. 173 Minn. 414 , ; Nesseth v. Skelly Oil Co. 176 Minn. 373 , ; Lemkuhl v. Clark, 209 Minn. 276 , ; Byhardt v. Ballord, 209 Minn. 391 , ; Bol
Judd v. Sanatorium Commission of Hennepin County 35 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1948
Judd v. Sanatorium Commission of Hennepin County 35 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1948
edoux v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Angell v. White Eagle O. & R. Co. 169 Minn. 183 , ; Lynch v. Hutchinson Produce Co. 169 Minn. 329 , ; Rouse v. Town of Bird Island, 169 Minn. 367 , ; Morss v. Murphy T. & S. Co. 170 Minn. 1 , ; Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , ; Krause v. Bodin, 172 Minn. 467 , ; Schonberg v. Zinsmaster Bak.
Castner v. Christgau 24 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1946
Castner v. Christgau 24 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1946
See, Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , ; Waters v. Pioneer Fuel Co. 52 Minn. 474 , , 38 A. S. R. 564.
Rochester Dairy Co. v. Christgau 14 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1944
Rochester Dairy Co. v. Christgau 14 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1944
Our reasons for this conclusion are found in Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , , where our prior cases are reviewed.
Curtis v. Hedeen 296 N.W. 495 Minn. 1941
Curtis v. Hedeen 296 N.W. 495 Minn. 1941
Tschida v. Bratt, 179 Minn. 277 , ; Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , ; Ledoux v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498 , ; Schoewe v. Winona Paint & Glass Co. 155 Minn. 4 , ; cf. Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Olson v. Eck’s Homemade Sausage Co. 194 Minn. 458 , ; Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 205 Minn. 595 , 287
Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 287 N.W. 7 Minn. 1939
Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 287 N.W. 7 Minn. 1939
Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , , is not in point.
Wass v. Bracker Construction Co. 240 N.W. 464 Minn. 1931
Wass v. Bracker Construction Co. 240 N.W. 464 Minn. 1931
S. 1923 ( 1 Mason, 1927 ) § 4290(1)- expressly removes from the operation of the laAV “an owner who lets a contract to a contractor in good faith” and any “contractor, Avho, in good faith, lets to a subcontractor a portion of his contract.” Moore v. Kileen & Grillis, 171 Minn. 15 , .
Barker v. Bemidji Wood Products Co. 238 N.W. 692 Minn. 1931
Barker v. Bemidji Wood Products Co. 238 N.W. 692 Minn. 1931
ed it himself; hired a man to assist; held an employe as a matter of law and not an independent contractor) ; Rouse v. Town of Bird Island, 169 Minn. 367 , (person worked with team in hauling gravel for town constructing a road; killed in gravel pit; paid at an agreed price per load; held as a matter of law an employe-and not an independent contractor); Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , (injured man owned *369 truck; used wherever he could get job; hauled camp supplies for defendant;
Reigel v. J. B. Finch Timber Co. Inc. 234 N.W. 452 Minn. 1931
Reigel v. J. B. Finch Timber Co. Inc. 234 N.W. 452 Minn. 1931
Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , ; Ledoux v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498 , .
Larson v. Duluth Woolen Co. 232 N.W. 915 Minn. 1930
Larson v. Duluth Woolen Co. 232 N.W. 915 Minn. 1930
Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Ledoux v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498 , ; Angell v. White Eagle O. & R. Co. 169 Minn. 183 , 210 * Lynch v. Hutchinson Produce Co. 169 Minn. 329 , ; Rouse v. Town of Bird Island, 169 Minn. 367 , ; Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , ; Krause v. Bodin, 172 Minn. 467 , ; Schonberg v. Zinsmaster B. Co. 173 Minn. 414 , ; Nesseth v. Skelly Oil Co. 176 Minn. 373 , ; Lampi v. Koponen, 178 Minn. 133 , ; 6 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Robertson v. Olson 232 N.W. 43 Minn. 1930
Robertson v. Olson 232 N.W. 43 Minn. 1930
The respondent cites Elliason v. Western C. & C. Co. 162 Minn. 213 , ; Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , ; Bloom v. Krueger, 182 Wis.
Nesseth v. Skelly Oil Co. 223 N.W. 608 Minn. 1929
Nesseth v. Skelly Oil Co. 223 N.W. 608 Minn. 1929
v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498 , ; Bosel v. *375 Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Angell v. White Eagle O. & R. Co. 169 Minn. 183 , ; Lynch v. Hutchinson Produce Co. 169 Minn. 329 , ; Rouse v. Town of Bird Island, 169 Minn. 367 , ; Morss v. Murphy T. & S. Co. 170 Minn. 1 , ; Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , ; Krause v. Bodin, 172 Minn. 467 , ; Schonberg v. Zinsmaster Bak.
Schonberg v. Zinsmaster Baking Co. 217 N.W. 491 Minn. 1928
Schonberg v. Zinsmaster Baking Co. 217 N.W. 491 Minn. 1928
Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Angell v. White Eagle O. & R. Co. 169 Minn. 183 , ; Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , .
Krause v. Bodin 215 N.W. 838 Minn. 1927
Krause v. Bodin 215 N.W. 838 Minn. 1927
The case is ruled by Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Lynch v. Hutchinson Produce Co. 169 Minn. 329 , , and the other cases involving the same issuei reviewed in Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , , where-the decision against compensation was put upon the absence not only of actual supervision but also the right to control.