Cited by

tion to having a registered agent, “BNSF owns 1,469 miles of railroad track and employs approximately 1,800 people in Minnesota.” In resolving both arguments, the district court relied on precedent from the Minnesota Supreme Court: Rykoff-Sexton, Inc. v. American 4 Appraisal Associates, Inc., (Due Process Clause); Erving v. Chicago & N orthwestern Railway Co., (dormant Commerce Clause).

Co., 171 Minn. 87 , 214 N.W.

Co. 171 Minn. 87 , ; Gloeser v. Dollar Steamship Lines, Inc. 192 Minn. 376 , ; Minnesota Commercial Men’s Assn. v. Benn, 261 U. S. 140 , 43 S. Ct. 293 , 67 L. ed. 573.

Co. 171 Minn. 87 , 214 N.W.

Co. 171 Minn. 87 , , and Boright v. C. R. I. & P. Ry.

Co. 171 Minn. 87 , ; Kobbe v. C. & N. W. Ry.

Co. 171 Minn. 87 , ; Kobbe v. C. & N. W. Ry.

Co. 171 Minn. 87 , ; Kobbe v. C. & N. W. Ry.

Co. 171 Minn. 87 , 214 N.W.

Co. 171 Minn. 87 , , the particular contention being that it is an undue burden upon interstate commerce to require defendant, a foreign common carrier, to bring its lawyers and witnesses into this state to try the case, the accident having occurred not on defendant’s railroad lines here but in Wisconsin, where plaintiff

Co. 171 Minn. 87 , , where this defendant by its present attorneys made the same argument as in the instant case.