Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ogrosky v. Commonwealth Electric Co., 214 N.W. 765.
- Radzak v. Mercy Hospital 190 N.W.2d 86 Minn. 1971
-
Radzak v. Mercy Hospital
190 N.W.2d 86
Minn. 1971
Co. 172 Minn. 46, 47 , , we said: “* * * Whether the rehearing should have been granted rested in the discretion of the commission.
- Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co. 187 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1971
-
Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co.
187 N.W.2d 133
Minn. 1971
Co. 172 Minn. 46, 47 , ): “* * * In the absence of something to indicate that a discretionary power has been exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, or contrary to legal usage, we are bound by the result.
- Mattson v. Abate 156 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1968
-
Mattson v. Abate
156 N.W.2d 738
Minn. 1968
Co. 172 Minn. 46 , ; Ronstadt v. Minor, 152 Minn. 10 , .
- Jacobson v. Uptown Transfer & Storage Co. 129 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 1964
-
Jacobson v. Uptown Transfer & Storage Co.
129 N.W.2d 41
Minn. 1964
Co. 172 Minn. 46, 47 , , we said: “* * * Whether the rehearing should have been granted rested in *342 the discretion of the commission.
- Plunkett v. Lampert 43 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1950
-
Plunkett v. Lampert
43 N.W.2d 489
Minn. 1950
Co. 172 Minn. 46, 48 , , we said: “* * * In the absence of something to indicate that a discretionary power has been exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, or contrary to legal usage, we are bound by the result.
- Gartner v. Hogstad Fish Co. 43 N.W.2d 798 Minn. 1950
-
Gartner v. Hogstad Fish Co.
43 N.W.2d 798
Minn. 1950
Co. 172 Minn. 46 , ; Elsenpeter v. Potvin, 213 Minn. 129 , 5 N. W. (2d) 499 ; Batchelder v. N. W. Hanna Fuel Co. 225 Minn. 250 , 30 N. W. (2d) 530 ; Graif v. Alexander, 226 Minn. 519 , 33 N. W. (2d) 702 .
- Batchelder v. Northwestern Hanna Fuel Co. 30 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1948
-
Batchelder v. Northwestern Hanna Fuel Co.
30 N.W.2d 530
Minn. 1948
Co. 172 Minn. 46, 47 , , the court said: “* * * Whether the rehearing should have been granted rested in the discretion of the commission.
- Bomersine v. Armour & Co. 30 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1947
- Bomersine v. Armour & Co. 30 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1947
- Leland v. St. Olaf Lutheran Church 14 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 1944
-
Leland v. St. Olaf Lutheran Church
14 N.W.2d 340
Minn. 1944
Co. 172 Minn. 46 , ; Delich v. Thompson-Starret Co. 175 Minn. 612 , *357 .
- Elsenpeter v. Potvin 5 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 1942
-
Elsenpeter v. Potvin
5 N.W.2d 499
Minn. 1942
Co. 172 Minn. 46 , ; Kallgren v. C. W. Lunquist Co. 172 Minn. 489 , .
- Leland v. St. Olaf Lutheran Church 4 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1942
-
Leland v. St. Olaf Lutheran Church
4 N.W.2d 769
Minn. 1942
Co. 172 Minn. 46 , ; Delich v. Thompson-Starret Co. 175 Minn. 612 , .
- In Re Dissolution of First State Bank of Correll 288 N.W. 709 Minn. 1939
- Cashman v. Bremer 206 Minn. 250 Minn. 1939
-
Cashman v. Bremer
206 Minn. 250
Minn. 1939
As stated in the cited case ( 172 Minn. 34 , ): *255 “Upon the hearing in such proceeding the court is required to receive and consider such evidence * * * as may be presented upon the following points: * * * “ ‘1.
-
In Re Dissolution of First State Bank of Correll
288 N.W. 709
Minn. 1939
As stated in the cited case ( 172 Minn. 34 , ): *Page 255 "Upon the hearing in such proceeding the court is required to receive and consider such evidence * * * as may be presented upon the following points: * * * " '1.
- Olson v. Dahlin Jones Electric Co. 252 N.W. 78 Minn. 1934
-
Olson v. Dahlin Jones Electric Co.
252 N.W. 78
Minn. 1934
Co. 172 Minn. 46 , 214 N.W.
- Cooper v. Mitchell 247 N.W. 805 Minn. 1933
-
Cooper v. Mitchell
247 N.W. 805
Minn. 1933
Co. 172 Minn. 46 , , and cases cited.
- Baumann v. A. C. Ochs Brick Tile Company 246 N.W. 249 Minn. 1933
-
Baumann v. A. C. Ochs Brick Tile Company
246 N.W. 249
Minn. 1933
Co. 172 Minn. 46 , ; Kallgren v. C. W. Lunquist Co. 172 Minn. 489 , ; Dotlich v. Shenango Furnace Co. 172 Minn. 603 , .
- Rosenquist v. O'Neil & Preston 245 N.W. 621 Minn. 1932
-
Rosenquist v. O'Neil & Preston
245 N.W. 621
Minn. 1932
Co. 172 Minn. 46 , ; Delich v. Thompson-Starret Co. 175 Minn. 612 , Frederickson v. Burns Lbr.
- Lickfett v. Jorgenson 229 N.W. 138 Minn. 1930
-
Lickfett v. Jorgenson
229 N.W. 138
Minn. 1930
Co. 172 Minn. 46 , ; Delich v. Thompson-Starret Co. 175 Minn. 612 , .
- Frederickson v. Burns Lumber Co. 227 N.W. 657 Minn. 1929
-
Frederickson v. Burns Lumber Co.
227 N.W. 657
Minn. 1929
Co. 172 Minn. 46 , , and cases cited.
- Frederickson v. Burns Lumber Co. 221 N.W. 910 Minn. 1928
-
Frederickson v. Burns Lumber Co.
221 N.W. 910
Minn. 1928
Co. 172 Minn. 46 , , and cases cited.
- Delich v. Thompson-Starret Co. 220 N.W. 408 Minn. 1928
-
Delich v. Thompson-Starret Co.
220 N.W. 408
Minn. 1928
Co. 172 Minn. 46 , , and cases cited, the question of granting a rehearing after an award rests in the sound discretion of the industrial commission.
- Orcutt v. Trustees of Wesley Methodist Episcopal Church 218 N.W. 550 Minn. 1928
-
Orcutt v. Trustees of Wesley Methodist Episcopal Church
218 N.W. 550
Minn. 1928
Co. 172 Minn. 46 , , the chief justice called attention to the fact that no judgment had been entered nor writ of certiorari issued.