Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Eichhorn v. Lundin, 216 N.W. 537.
- Peckskamp v. McDowall 165 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1969
-
Peckskamp v. McDowall
165 N.W.2d 254
Minn. 1969
Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591 , , cited by plaintiffs on this point, is not, in our opinion, controlling here as the facts there are not comparable to those in the case before us. In that case the action was for injuries arising out of a collision between plaintiff’s auto and defendants’ truck in North Mankato.
- State v. Garden 125 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1963
-
State v. Garden
125 N.W.2d 591
Minn. 1963
Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591 , .
- Rudd v. Village of Bovey 89 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1958
-
Rudd v. Village of Bovey
89 N.W.2d 689
Minn. 1958
Campion v. City of Rochester, 202 Minn. 136 , ; Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591 , .
- Ferguson v. Kehoe 71 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1955
-
Ferguson v. Kehoe
71 N.W.2d 168
Minn. 1955
Co. 242 Minn. 1 , 64 N. W. (2d) 82 ; Campion v. City of Rochester, 202 Minn. 136 , ; Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591 , ; Coffman v. Summer, 179 Minn. 120 , .
- Webster v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 64 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 1954
-
Webster v. St. Paul City Railway Co.
64 N.W.2d 82
Minn. 1954
Campion v. City of Rochester, 202 Minn. 136 , ; Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591 , ; Coffman v. Kummer, 179 Minn. 120 , .
- Olson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 5 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 1942
-
Olson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.
5 N.W.2d 492
Minn. 1942
He was of the opinion that the “drive within your light” rule is not an arbitrary one, “or should not be so.” There are two necessary elements in contributory negligence, the first being (Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591, 595 , 216 N. W. *111 537, 538) “want of ordinary care,” and the next, “a causal connection between plaintiff’s conduct and the accident.
- Campion v. City of Rochester 277 N.W. 422 Minn. 1938
-
Campion v. City of Rochester
277 N.W. 422
Minn. 1938
Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591 , .
- Guthrie v. Brown 256 N.W. 898 Minn. 1934
-
Guthrie v. Brown
256 N.W. 898
Minn. 1934
Co. 169 Minn. 342 , ; Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591 , ; Fitzgerald v. Village of Bovey, 174 Minn 450, ; Mechler v. McMahon, 180 Minn. 252 , ; Heikkinen v. Cashen, 183 Minn. 146 , ; Brown v. Raymond Bros. M. T. Inc. 186 Minn. 321 , .
- State v. Solum 235 N.W. 390 Minn. 1931
-
State v. Solum
235 N.W. 390
Minn. 1931
Steinbauer v. Stone, 85 Minn. 274 , ; Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591 , ; State v. Kaufman, 172 Minn. 139 , ; State v. Farmer, 179 Minn. 516 , .
- Carlson v. Naddy 232 N.W. 3 Minn. 1930
-
Carlson v. Naddy
232 N.W. 3
Minn. 1930
Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591, 595 , .
- Seitz v. Claybourne 231 N.W. 714 Minn. 1930
-
Seitz v. Claybourne
231 N.W. 714
Minn. 1930
Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591 , .
- Mechler v. McMahon 230 N.W. 776 Minn. 1930
-
Mechler v. McMahon
230 N.W. 776
Minn. 1930
Co. 169 Minn. 342 , ; Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591 , .
- Fitch v. City of Blue Earth 230 N.W. 469 Minn. 1930
-
Fitch v. City of Blue Earth
230 N.W. 469
Minn. 1930
Many of the rules as to contributory negligence are stated in Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591 , .
- Rosenthal v. McCulloch 225 N.W. 651 Minn. 1929
-
Rosenthal v. McCulloch
225 N.W. 651
Minn. 1929
Eich-horn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591, 595 , .
- Olson v. Byam 224 N.W. 256 Minn. 1929
-
Olson v. Byam
224 N.W. 256
Minn. 1929
The elements of contributory negligence are stated in Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591 , .
- Garedpy v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 223 N.W. 605 Minn. 1929
-
Garedpy v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
223 N.W. 605
Minn. 1929
Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. 163 Minn. 280 , ; Rimmer v. Cohen, 172 Minn. 134 , ; Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591 , ; Davis v. Minneapolis St.
- McCabe v. Duluth Street Railway Co. 220 N.W. 162 Minn. 1928
-
McCabe v. Duluth Street Railway Co.
220 N.W. 162
Minn. 1928
Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591 , , and cases there cited.