26,592. Precedential Affirmed Processed

Kuske v. Jevne

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed February 17, 1928 · 218 N.W. 93

Cited by

Dannheim Development, Inc. v. Mogler 412 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hereford Farms Co., Inc. v. Lende 220 N.W. 435 Minn. 1928

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

First State Bank v. Schatz 104 Minn. 425
McAllister v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 116 N.W. 917

Opinion text

*585 Per Curiam. Plaintiff appeals from an order vacating a writ of attachment and the levy- thereunder. On the showing made before the trial court there was dispute as to some of the facts, and the facts that were undisputed were such that different inferences and conclusions could reasonably be drawn therefrom. In that situation the rule announced in First State Bank v. Schatz, 104 Minn. 425 , 116 N. W. 917 , applies. Affirmed.