Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Seeling, Jr. v. Deposit Bank Trust Co., 222 N.W. 295.
- Village Apartments v. State 320 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1982
- In Re Objections and Defenses, Etc. 320 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1982
-
Village Apartments v. State
320 N.W.2d 729
Minn. 1982
An order is not appealable under Rule 103.03(d) “unless in effect it finally determines the action or finally determines some positive legal right of the appellant relating thereto.” Seeling v. Deposit Bank & Trust Co., 176 Minn. 11, 13 , 222 N.W.
-
In Re Objections and Defenses, Etc.
320 N.W.2d 729
Minn. 1982
Seeling v. Deposit Bank & Trust Co., 176 Minn. 11, 13 , 222 N.W.
- Wallace T. Bruce, Inc. v. Najarian 81 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 1957
-
Wallace T. Bruce, Inc. v. Najarian
81 N.W.2d 282
Minn. 1957
Chapman v. Dorsey, 230 Minn. 279 , 41 N. W. (2d) 438 , 16 A. L. R. (2d) 1015; Seeling v. Deposit Bank & Trust Co. 176 Minn. 11 , ; Peterson v. Darelius, 168 Minn. 365 , ; In re Jones, 33 Minn. 405 , .
- Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc. 62 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1953
-
Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc.
62 N.W.2d 73
Minn. 1953
Seeling v. Deposit Bank & Trust Co. 176 Minn. 11 , ; Rodgers v. Steiner, 206 Minn. 637 , ; Edelstein v. Levine, 179 Minn. 136 , .
- Shema v. Thorpe Bros. 57 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1953
-
Shema v. Thorpe Bros.
57 N.W.2d 157
Minn. 1953
Chapman v. Dorsey, 230 Minn. 279 , 41 N. W. (2d) 438 , 16 A. L. R. (2d) 1015; Seeling v. Deposit B. & T. Co. 176 Minn. 11 , ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
- Chapman v. Dorsey 230 Minn. 279 Minn. 1950
-
Chapman v. Dorsey
230 Minn. 279
Minn. 1950
In construing the statutory phrase "From an order involving the merits of the action or some part thereof," we said in Seeling v. Deposit B. & T. Co. 176 Minn. 11, 13 , 222 N.W.
- Corwin v. Hudson 20 N.W.2d 330 Minn. 1945
- In Re Guardianship of Hudson 20 N.W.2d 330 Minn. 1945
-
Corwin v. Hudson
20 N.W.2d 330
Minn. 1945
1940 Supp. § 9490) ; Seeling v. Deposit B. & T. Co. 176 Minn. 11 , .
-
In Re Guardianship of Hudson
20 N.W.2d 330
Minn. 1945
1940 Supp. § 9490); Seeling v. Deposit B. T. Co. 176 Minn. 11 , 222 N.W.
- In Re Condemnation of Lands Owned by Luhrs 19 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1945
- In re Burnquist 220 Minn. 129 Minn. 1945
-
In re Burnquist
220 Minn. 129
Minn. 1945
Seeling v. Deposit B. & T. Co. 176 Minn. 11 , .
-
In Re Condemnation of Lands Owned by Luhrs
19 N.W.2d 77
Minn. 1945
Seeling v. Deposit B. T. Co. 176 Minn. 11 , 222 N.W.
- Bulau v. Bulau 294 N.W. 845 Minn. 1940
-
Bulau v. Bulau
294 N.W. 845
Minn. 1940
1927, § 9498; Seeling v. Deposit B. & T. Co. 176 Minn. 11 , .
- Rodgers v. Steiner 289 N.W. 580 Minn. 1940
-
Rodgers v. Steiner
289 N.W. 580
Minn. 1940
Judge Taylor, in Seeling v. Deposit B. T. Co. 176 Minn. 11 , 13 , 222 N.W.
- Gilmore v. City of Mankato 269 N.W. 113 Minn. 1936
-
Gilmore v. City of Mankato
269 N.W. 113
Minn. 1936
It must be something more than a mere ruling or intermediate order made in the course of the trial on a question of procedure.” Minneapolis Trust Co. v. Menage, 66 Minn. 447 , ; Swanson v. Alworth, 157 Minn. 312 , ; Greber v. Harris, 167 Minn. 522 , ; Seeling, Jr. v. Deposit B. & T. Co. 176 Minn. 11 , .