DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mix v. Downing, 222 N.W. 913.

38 citing documents.

  • Barilla v. Clapshaw 237 N.W.2d 830 Minn. 1976
  • Barilla v. Clapshaw 237 N.W.2d 830 Minn. 1976
    Co. 259 Minn. 341 , Aronovitch v. Levy, 238 Minn. 237 , Larson v. Stowe, 228 Minn. 216 , Larson v. Sventek, 211 Minn. 385 , Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , Nygard v. Minneapolis St.
  • Jeffries v. Gillitzer 225 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1975
  • Jeffries v. Gillitzer 225 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1975
    Co. 259 Minn. 341 , Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156
  • Schmidt v. Smith 216 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 1974
  • Schmidt v. Smith 216 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 1974
    Co. 147 Minn. 109 , ; Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , ; 48 A. L. R. 1462; 15 Minn. L. Rev. 805 .
  • Schoenfeld v. Buker 114 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1962
  • Schoenfeld v. Buker 114 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1962
    Co. 157 Minn. 474 , ; Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , ; Althoff v. Torrison, 140 Minn. 8 , ; Nygard v. Minneapolis St.
  • Johnson v. O'BRIEN 105 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1960
  • Johnson v. O'BRIEN 105 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1960
    168 Minn. 118 , ; Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , ; Johnson v. Theo.
  • Gethsemane Lutheran Church v. Zacho 104 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1960
  • Gethsemane Lutheran Church v. Zacho 104 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1960
    Co. 170 Minn. 326 , ; C. H. Young Co. v. Springer, 113 Minn. 382 , ; Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , ; Thwing v. Hall & Ducey Lbr.
  • Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc. 92 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1958
  • Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc. 92 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1958
    Hanson v. Northern States Power Co. 198 Minn. 24 , ; Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , ; Nygard v. Minneapolis St.
  • Guptill v. Conlon Construction Co. 58 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1953
  • Guptill v. Conlon Construction Co. 58 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1953
    Aronovitch v. Levy, 238 Minn. 237 , 56 N. W. (2d) 570 ; Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , ; Nygard v. Minneapolis St.
  • Aronovitch v. Levy 56 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1953
  • Aronovitch v. Levy 56 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1953
    Co. 157 Minn. 474 , ; Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , ; Simpson v. Omaha & C. B. St.
  • Sand v. City of Little Falls 55 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1952
  • Sand v. City of Little Falls 55 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1952
    Landru v. Lund, 38 Minn. 538 , ; Ray v. Jones & Adams Co. 92 Minn. 101 , ; Latell v.- Cunningham, 122 Minn, 144, ; Williams v. John A. Stees Co. Inc. 172 Minn. 35 , ; City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , ; Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , .
  • Norris v. Cohen 27 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1947
  • Norris v. Cohen 27 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1947
    * * * even with unilateral mistake of law relief may be had by the innocent *479 party if his mistake is accompanied by inequitable conduct on the part of his adversary, as where the latter knowingly has sought advantage from it for his own unconscionable enrichment.” See, also, Benson v. Markoe, 37 Minn. 30 , , 5 A. S. R. 816; Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156, 160 , ; Becker v. Bundy, 177 Minn. 415 , ; Rigby v. Nord, 208 Minn. 88 , .
  • Shepstedt v. Hayes 21 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1945
  • Shepstedt v. Hayes 21 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1945
    2 Landru v. Lund, 38 Minn. 538 , ; Ray v. Jones & Adams Co. 92 Minn. 101 , ; Latell v. Cunningham, 122 Minn. 144 , ; Williams v. John A. Stees Co. Inc. 172 Minn. 35 , ; City of Wabasha v. Southworth, 54 Minn. 79 , ; Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , .
  • Anderson v. Winkle 5 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1942
  • Anderson v. Winkle 5 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1942
    2 “The following cases are in accord: Klugman v. Schwartz, 186 Minn. 139 , ; Normandin v. Freidson, 181 Minn. 471 , ; Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , ; Soper v. Erickson, 172 Minn. 377 , ; Rose v. Mooers Bros. Inc. 161 Minn. 149 , ; McNab v. Wallin, 133 Minn. 370 , ; La Pray v. *81 Lavoris Chemical Co. 117 Minn. 152 , ; Farley v. Byers, 106 Minn. 260 , , 130 A. S. R. 613; Widing v. Penn Mut.
  • Larson v. Sventek 1 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1941
  • Larson v. Sventek 1 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1941
    642 ; Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , ; Nygard v. Minneapolis St.
  • Lyman v. Hermann 280 N.W. 862 Minn. 1938
  • Lyman v. Hermann 280 N.W. 862 Minn. 1938
    297, 311 , 51 A. 962 , 58 L. R. A. 321.” This trap door was not defective like the manhole cover in Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , , where, however, this court *231 left liability of the lessor undetermined because the terms of the lease did not appear.
  • Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co. 278 N.W. 355 Minn. 1938
  • Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co. 278 N.W. 355 Minn. 1938
    642 ; Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , ; 48 A.L.R.
  • Hanson v. Northern States Power Co. 268 N.W. 642 Minn. 1936
  • Hanson v. Northern States Power Co. 268 N.W. 642 Minn. 1936
    Co. 157 Minn. 474 , ; Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , ; Simpson v. Omaha & C. B. St.
  • Fornaro v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 234 N.W. 300 Minn. 1931
  • Fornaro v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 234 N.W. 300 Minn. 1931
    In Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , , plaintiff had settled for what was assumed to be a minor and temporary injury.
  • Mix v. Downing 229 N.W. 319 Minn. 1930
  • Mix v. Downing 229 N.W. 319 Minn. 1930
    The case was here on a former appeal and is reported in Mix v. Downing, 176 Minn. 156 , .