Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rimmer v. Cohen, 215 N.W. 198.

30 citing documents.

Kmetz v. Johnson 113 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1962
Kmetz v. Johnson 113 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1962
2 See, for instance, Liebrecht v. Crandall, 110 Minn. 454 , ; Allen v. Johnson, 144 Minn. 333 , ; Johnson v. Schuler, 152 Minn. 137 , ; Lustik v. Walters, 169 Minn. 313 , 211 N. W. *400 311; Rimmer v. Cohen, 172 Minn. 134 , ; Kinnonen v. Adolphson, 173 Minn. 138 , ; Saunders v. Yellow Cab Corp. 182 Minn. 62 , ; Heikkinen v. Cashen, 183 Minn. 146 , ; Bolster v. Cooper, 188 Minn. 364 , .
Wallace T. Bruce, Inc. v. Najarian 81 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 1957
Wallace T. Bruce, Inc. v. Najarian 81 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 1957
In the Westerman case this court rendered a homestead available to a creditor against whom it was not exempt in a suit where the bankruptcy court withheld discharge and said ( 172 Minn. 199 , ): “Our constitution gives such a creditor a right which he may protect from destruction by the bankruptcy act.
Greenberg v. Holfeltz 69 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1955
Greenberg v. Holfeltz 69 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1955
10 See, also, Rimmer v. Cohen, 172 Minn. 134 , ; Wickham v. Chicago, St.
Hierl v. McClure 56 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1953
Hierl v. McClure 56 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1953
See, Rimmer v. Cohen, 172 Minn. 134 , .
Kraus v. Saffert 293 N.W. 253 Minn. 1940
Kraus v. Saffert 293 N.W. 253 Minn. 1940
Norling v. Stempf, 208 Minn. 143 , ; Rimmer v. Cohen, 172 Minn. 134 , .
Reier v. Hart 277 N.W. 405 Minn. 1938
Reier v. Hart 277 N.W. 405 Minn. 1938
Rimmer v. Cohen, 172 Minn. 134 , ; Heflin v. Swenson, supra.
Benson v. Northland Transportation Co. 274 N.W. 532 Minn. 1937
Benson v. Northland Transportation Co. 274 N.W. 532 Minn. 1937
Rimmer v. Cohen, 172 Minn. 134 , ; Hollander v. Dietrich, 181 Minn. 376 , ; Peterson v. Miller, 182 Minn. 532 , ; Harkness v. Zube, 182 Minn. 594 , ; Eckhardt v. Hanson, 196 Minn. 270 , , 107 A. L. R. 1; Patzke v. M. & St.
Carlson v. Sanitary Farm Dairies, Inc. 273 N.W. 665 Minn. 1937
Murray v. Jacobson 262 N.W. 152 Minn. 1935
Murray v. Jacobson 262 N.W. 152 Minn. 1935
That applies also to Rimmer v. Cohen, 172 Minn. 134 , .
Donaldson v. Carstensen 247 N.W. 522 Minn. 1933
Donaldson v. Carstensen 247 N.W. 522 Minn. 1933
Rimmer v. Cohen, 172 Minn. 134 , ; Carlson v. Stork, 188 Minn. 204 , .
Bolster v. Cooper 247 N.W. 250 Minn. 1933
Bolster v. Cooper 247 N.W. 250 Minn. 1933
Liebrecht v. Crandall, 110 Minn. 454 , ; Allen v. Johnson, 144 Minn. 333 , ; Johnson v. Schuler, 152 Minn. 137 , ; Lustik v. Walters, 169 Minn. 313 , ; Rimmer v. Cohen, 172 Minn. 134 , 215 A. W. 198; Kinnonen v. Adolphson, 173 Minn. 138 , ; Saunders v. Yellow Cab Corp. 182 Minn. 62 , ; Heikkinen v. Cashen, 183 Minn. 146 , .
Plante v. Pulaski 243 N.W. 64 Minn. 1932
Plante v. Pulaski 243 N.W. 64 Minn. 1932
Of our own cases leading to that conclusion we note Johnson v. Brastad, 143 Minn. 332 , ; Quinn v. Heidman, 157 Minn. 129 , ; Tobisch v. Villaume, 164 Minn. 126 , ; Bimmer v. Cohen, 172 Minn. 134 , ; Kinnonen v. Adolphson, 173 Minn. 138 , ; Schmitt v. Jackson, 174 Minn. 577 , ; Heflin v. Swenson, 181 Minn. 277 , ; Saunders v. Yellow Cab Corp. 182 Minn. 62 , .
Klaman v. Hitchcock 231 N.W. 716 Minn. 1930
Klaman v. Hitchcock 231 N.W. 716 Minn. 1930
Co. *114 132 Minn. 147 , , ; State v. Hines, 148 Minn. 393 , ; Outcelt v. C. B. & Q. R. Co. 150 Minn. 398 , ; Spangenberg v. Christian, 151 Minn. 356 , ; Rimmer v. Cohen, 172 Minn. 134 , .
Garedpy v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 223 N.W. 605 Minn. 1929
Garedpy v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 223 N.W. 605 Minn. 1929
Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. 163 Minn. 280 , ; Rimmer v. Cohen, 172 Minn. 134 , ; Eichhorn v. Lundin, 172 Minn. 591 , ; Davis v. Minneapolis St.
Kinnonen v. Adolphson 216 N.W. 605 Minn. 1927
Kinnonen v. Adolphson 216 N.W. 605 Minn. 1927
Within the decision of Rimmer v. Cohen, 172 Minn. 134 , , and the cases therein cited, we think the issue of plaintiff’s contributory negligence upon this record was for the jury.
Chandler v. Buchanan 216 N.W. 254 Minn. 1927