26,380. Precedential Granted Processed

State v. Anderson

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed December 31, 1927 · 217 N.W. 351

Cited by

State v. Jackson 325 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1982
State v. Sha 193 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1972
State v. Hayes 172 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1969
State v. Wright 427 P.2d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
State v. Reardon 73 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1955
State v. McGunn 294 N.W. 208 Minn. 1940
State v. McClain 292 N.W. 753 Minn. 1940
State v. Cater 252 N.W. 421 Minn. 1934
State v. Hook 219 N.W. 926 Minn. 1928

Opinion text

Per Curiam. Appeal from a judgment.- Defendant was convicted of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. On cross-examination he was required to testify over proper objection that he had first plead guilty to the accusation made in the information upon which he was on trial and that he thereafter withdrew such plea by leave of the court. This was error. Under such circumstances the former plea is held for naught. Kercheval v. U. S. 274 U. S. 220 , 47 S. Ct. 582 , 71 L. ed. 1009. A new trial is granted. Reversed.