Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite School District No. 1, Itasca County v. Aiton, 221 N.W. 424.

28 citing documents.

State ex rel. Peterson v. Anderson 69 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1955
State ex rel. Peterson v. Anderson 69 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1955
Bahnsen vs. Gilbert, 55 Minn. 334 , [1117]; School District No. 1, Itasca County vs. Aiten, 175 Minn. 346 , .
Thayer v. Duffy 63 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1953
Thayer v. Duffy 63 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1953
No. 1 v. Aiton, 175 Minn. 346 , ; Noonan v. Spear, 125 Minn. 475 , .
State v. Longyear Holding Co. 35 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1948
State v. Longyear Holding Co. 35 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1948
No. 1 v. Aiton, 175 Minn. 346, 348 , ; Skog v. Pomush, 221 Minn. 11 , 20 N. W. (2d) 530 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
In Re Estate of Hallock 20 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1945
Nelson v. Anderson 20 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1945
Nelson v. Anderson 20 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1945
School District v. Aiton, 175 Minn. 346 , .
In Re Estate of Hallock 20 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1945
School District v. Aiton, 175 Minn. 346 , 221 N.W.
Skog v. Pomush 20 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1945
Skog v. Pomush 20 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1945
The settled rule, except perhaps in some very exceptional cases, of which it is not even claimed that this case is one, is as we said in School District No. 1 v. Aiton, 175 Minn. 346, 348 , , that, “where an order denying a new trial has been affirmed on appeal, all questions that might have been raised therein are set at rest and cannot be raised on a subsequent appeal from the judgment.” 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Lustmann v. Lustmann 283 N.W. 387 Minn. 1939
Lustmann v. Lustmann 283 N.W. 387 Minn. 1939
School District No. 1 v. Aiton, 175 Minn. 346 , .
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Becher-Barrett-Lockerby Co. 274 N.W. 522 Minn. 1937
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Becher-Barrett-Lockerby Co. 274 N.W. 522 Minn. 1937
In School District No. 1 v. Aiton, 175 Minn. 346, 349 , , it was said: “Without the consent of all the parties he had no right to amend the findings of fact (Bahnsen v. Gilbert, 55 Minn. 334 , ); but he had the right to amend the conclusions of law so as to order the judgment called for by the findings of fact; and if any fact found
City of Marshall v. Gregoire 259 N.W. 377 Minn. 1935
City of Marshall v. Gregoire 259 N.W. 377 Minn. 1935
175 Minn. 346 , 221 N.W.
Wilcox v. Hedwall 243 N.W. 711 Minn. 1932
Wilcox v. Hedwall 243 N.W. 711 Minn. 1932
No. 1 v. Aiton, 175 Minn. 346 , ; Kozisek v. Brigham, 183 Minn. 457 , .
Kozisek v. Brigham 237 N.W. 25 Minn. 1931
Kozisek v. Brigham 237 N.W. 25 Minn. 1931
No. 1 v. Alton, 175 Minn. 346 , .
County of Marshall v. Bakke 234 N.W. 1 Minn. 1930
County of Marshall v. Bakke 234 N.W. 1 Minn. 1930
No. 1 v. Aiton, 175 Minn. 346 , 221 N.W.
In Re Estate of Holum 229 N.W. 133 Minn. 1930
In Re Estate of Holum 229 N.W. 133 Minn. 1930
No. 1 v. Aiton, 175 Minn. 346 , .
School District No. 13 v. Nissen 225 N.W. 444 Minn. 1929
School District No. 13 v. Nissen 225 N.W. 444 Minn. 1929